To: pissant
It is barely watchable unless you really want to see what happens towards the end of Michael Corleone's life. In particular, Coppola apparently couldn't find anyone to play Michael Corleone's 20 something daughter so he ended up casting his daughter whose name I forget.
Watching her attempt to act is like going to the dentist and getting your teeth drilled.
89 posted on
12/12/2005 8:31:25 AM PST by
day10
(Wherever you come near the human race there's layers and layers of nonsense.)
To: day10
I wonder how much better Godfather III would have been received had it not been for Sofia Coppola?
96 posted on
12/12/2005 8:33:13 AM PST by
dfwgator
To: day10
I think she played the infant in the first Godfather to.
To: day10
I disagree- I think she had a sex appeal that drove me wild
141 posted on
12/12/2005 8:50:29 AM PST by
Mr. K
(Some days even my lucky rocket ship underpants don't help...)
To: day10
Nice. I will avoid part III. Seems to be the concensus wise decision.
144 posted on
12/12/2005 8:51:54 AM PST by
pissant
To: day10
Watching her attempt to act is like going to the dentist and getting your teeth drilled."Is it safe?"
185 posted on
12/12/2005 9:14:14 AM PST by
Smokin' Joe
(How often God must weep at humans' folly.)
To: day10
It is barely watchable
Man, o' man, did that movie stink up the theatre.
GF and GF II were done so well and then he had to follow them up with that turd of a movie should have been a crime.
Not only did her acting suck, but she was kinda' hard on the eyes too.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson