Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why do people switch to Linux?
O'Reilly ^ | Oct. 27, 2005 | Tom Adelstein

Posted on 10/30/2005 6:08:37 AM PST by Halfmanhalfamazing

During the last month, we conducted a survey of readers who use Linux. We asked them why they switched to Linux and received a plethora of answers. Surprisingly, anti-Microsoft sentiment had less to do with the choice than one might imagine.

Could the pundits have it all wrong? Is it possible that Linux stands on its own merits? Most Linux users would yes. Use of Linux does not represent a rebellion against Microsoft and Linux stands on its own as a user preference.

(Excerpt) Read more at oreillynet.com ...


TOPICS: Computers/Internet
KEYWORDS: linux

1 posted on 10/30/2005 6:08:38 AM PST by Halfmanhalfamazing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Halfmanhalfamazing
I'm not going to touch this one even if I am hiding behind my firewall.
Cheers
2 posted on 10/30/2005 6:33:24 AM PST by ComputerGuy (An expert is a person who avoids the small errors while sweeping on to the grand fallacy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Halfmanhalfamazing
These days, I use Linux as my operating system of choice; the BSDs are certainly fine operating systems, but for some reason when I go to put up something new, it's a Linux distribution.

Microsoft, well, I am not sure why I even want to use it except as a means to support a device that I cannot manage to get a Linux or BSD box to handle (a number of manufacturers are still poor at providing Linux device drivers), or if I need an application such as optical character recognition where open source software is weak --- GOCR and OCRAD are just not as good as the PC software out there.

But just for web browsing and email, aesthetically I think Firefox, Thunderbird, and Evolution on X now look better than on Windows, and certainly I find it pleasant to not be worrying about the enormously proliferated malware infecting so much of the Windows world.

3 posted on 10/30/2005 6:56:24 AM PST by snowsislander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Halfmanhalfamazing

I've been using Red Hat 9 (which is a couple of years old) on one computer recently and Firefox is noticably faster on Linux than on W2K. The lack of software is a bother, though, especially something like PhotoShop (GIMP does a lot but is harder to use than PS).

The multiplicity of sources for Linux probably means greater stability of design as there isn't a single source who can change everything at will.


4 posted on 10/30/2005 7:58:04 AM PST by Grut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Grut

Isn't Adobe coming out with a Linux/Unix version of Photo Shop and Illustrator? My biggest gripe is my favorite game (Age of Empire) will not run on Linux or any of the emulators very well.


5 posted on 10/30/2005 8:36:27 AM PST by neb52
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Grut

Odd. I've had occasion to run some large multithread applications under both RH9 and Cygnus under W2K. They did noticably better under Cygnus, must have something to do with how it handles threads.

Single thread apps do run better under RH9 though.


6 posted on 10/30/2005 8:43:38 AM PST by djf (Government wants the same things I do - MY guns, MY property, MY freedoms!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce

ping


7 posted on 10/30/2005 4:26:37 PM PST by JoJo Gunn (Help control the Leftist population. Have them spayed or neutered. ©)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: snowsislander

The one that is increasingly getting my attention is solaris.


8 posted on 10/30/2005 4:55:36 PM PST by Halfmanhalfamazing (You upgraded to Linux? No, I'm not surprised your computer works properly now. Amazing, no?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: neb52

Nah, it'll be a while before adobe makes it's flagship products for linux. The token acrobat reader is just that. A token, a test.

Linux'll have to gain more than it's 2 or so % userbase before adobe will invest the kind of money needed. I'd say linux would need at least 5 %, as we already have GIMP. Chances are they see us... not as pirates.... but as cheapskates.(which technically, they're probably right)

I don't deny that photoshop is better. But for it's +600 price tag.... it isn't that good.


9 posted on 10/30/2005 4:59:39 PM PST by Halfmanhalfamazing (You upgraded to Linux? No, I'm not surprised your computer works properly now. Amazing, no?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: neb52

http://transgaming.org/gamesdb/ratings/view.mhtml?game_id=2408

It's playable.

Often times I've heard people say that windows games play smoother on linux. I find this ironic.


10 posted on 10/30/2005 5:05:08 PM PST by Halfmanhalfamazing (You upgraded to Linux? No, I'm not surprised your computer works properly now. Amazing, no?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Halfmanhalfamazing
Yes I see that it has a better rating then the previous Cedega versions. I will give it a try. As far as Acrobat Reader, that is a poor teaser considering all of the pdf readers and writers for Linux. Also how accurate is that 2% figure. Is that just people that use Linux only? I would think it is bigger than that, but most keep a windows box around.
11 posted on 10/30/2005 5:48:29 PM PST by neb52
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Halfmanhalfamazing
I am not a programmer, but you would think if there is a Mac version of PS and Illustrator. That somebody would of ported to other Unix/Linux OSes.
12 posted on 10/30/2005 5:52:28 PM PST by neb52
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neb52

^^^^^^^^^^Also how accurate is that 2% figure^^^^^^^^^^^

It's kind of hard to gauge. It's all based on estimates. But both IDC and Gartner place linux usage above the mac, which is just under 2%.

http://www.macobserver.com/article/2002/12/19.13.shtml

IDC thought it happened in 2003.

http://www.wired.com/news/mac/0,2125,64504,00.html?tw=wn_story_related

Gartner says 2005. I'm more inclined to believe Gartner. I'm curious how the intel/mac thing will work out. I don't believe it'll be enough, Apple has lost the #2 spot for good.

Try googling around for additional info if you'd like.


13 posted on 10/31/2005 4:46:41 AM PST by Halfmanhalfamazing (You upgraded to Linux? No, I'm not surprised your computer works properly now. Amazing, no?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: neb52

Money talks. I'm sure that they have a photoshop version running somewhere in the bowels of their facilities. But they won't put emphasis on it until there's more userbase for linux.


14 posted on 10/31/2005 4:47:56 AM PST by Halfmanhalfamazing (You upgraded to Linux? No, I'm not surprised your computer works properly now. Amazing, no?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Halfmanhalfamazing
Why do people switch to Linux?

Because they are too cheap to buy a MAC.

15 posted on 10/31/2005 4:52:42 AM PST by Casloy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Halfmanhalfamazing
I was just wondering if the figure took into fact how many people don't use Linux everyday, because of the lack of popular software titles. How many more people would be using Linux/Unix or Mac for that matter if more games and popular production software was dual ported? (rhetorical question)
16 posted on 10/31/2005 12:05:16 PM PST by neb52
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: neb52

I agree.

It's a classic chicken/egg situation.

Linux needs more software titles in order to gain marketshare.
Linux needs more marketshare in order for software makers to see a reason for them to port their softwares.


17 posted on 11/01/2005 4:23:38 AM PST by Halfmanhalfamazing (You upgraded to Linux? No, I'm not surprised your computer works properly now. Amazing, no?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Halfmanhalfamazing

Reason I switched to Linux:

I like my computer to be working, rather than to be working on my computer.

My uptime record is 62 days without a restart, and then, I only had to reboot because of a power failure.


18 posted on 11/01/2005 2:23:24 PM PST by FLAMING DEATH (And now, for something completely different: www.donaldlancow.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson