I am not accusing, just wondering.
Why is it that re-building the Saturn-5 is impossible today?
![]() |
Will anyone notice, 100 feet away, something else Armstrong left behind?
Ringed by footprints, sitting in the moondust, lies a 2-foot wide panel studded with 100 mirrors pointing at Earth: the "lunar laser ranging retroreflector array."
Apollo 11 astronauts Buzz Aldrin and Neil Armstrong put it there on July 21, 1969, about an hour before the end of their final moonwalk. Thirty-five years later, it's the only Apollo science experiment still running.
University of Maryland physics professor Carroll Alley was the project's principal investigator during the Apollo years, and he follows its progress today.
"Using these mirrors," explains Alley, "we can 'ping' the moon with laser pulses and measure the Earth-moon distance very precisely. This is a wonderful way to learn about the moon's orbit and to test theories of gravity."
Here's how it works: A laser pulse shoots out of a telescope on Earth, crosses the Earth-moon divide, and hits the array. Because the mirrors are "corner-cube reflectors," they send the pulse straight back where it came from.
"It's like hitting a ball into the corner of a squash court," explains Alley. Back on Earth, telescopes intercept the returning pulse-"usually just a single photon," he marvels.
The round-trip travel time pinpoints the moon's distance with staggering precision: better than a few centimeters out of 385,000 km, typically.
Targeting the mirrors and catching their faint reflections is a challenge, but astronomers have been doing it for 35 years.
A key observing site is the McDonald Observatory in Texas where a 0.7 meter telescope regularly pings reflectors in the Sea of Tranquility (Apollo 11), at Fra Mauro (Apollo 14) and Hadley Rille (Apollo 15), and, sometimes, in the Sea of Serenity.
There's a set of mirrors there onboard the parked Soviet Lunokhud 2 moon rover-maybe the coolest-looking robot ever built.
In this way, for decades, researchers have carefully traced the moon's orbit, and they've learned some remarkable things, among them:
(1) The moon is spiraling away from Earth at a rate of 3.8 cm per year. Why? Earth's ocean tides are responsible.
(2) The moon probably has a liquid core.
(3) The universal force of gravity is very stable. Newton's gravitational constant G has changed less than 1 part in 100-billion since the laser experiments began.
Physicists have also used the laser results to check Einstein's theory of gravity, the general theory of relativity. So far, so good: Einstein's equations predict the shape of the moon's orbit as well as laser ranging can measure it.
But Einstein, constantly tested, isn't out of the woods yet. Some physicists (Alley is one of them) believe his general theory of relativity is flawed. If there is a flaw, lunar laser ranging might yet find it.
NASA and the National Science Foundation are funding a new facility in New Mexico, the Apache Point Observatory Lunar Laser-ranging Operation or, appropriately, "APOLLO" for short.
Using a 3.5-meter telescope with good atmospheric "seeing," researchers there will examine the moon's orbit with millimeter precision, 10 times better than before.
"Who knows what they'll discover?" wonders Alley.
More and better data could reveal strange fluctuations in gravity, amendments to Einstein, the "sloshing" of the moon's core. Time will tell ... and there's plenty of time. Lunar mirrors require no power source.
They haven't been covered with moondust or pelted by meteoroids, as early Apollo planners feared. Lunar ranging should continue for decades, perhaps for centuries.
Picture this: Tourists in the Sea of Tranquility, looking up at Earth. Half of the planet is dark, including New Mexico where a pinprick of light appears. A laser.
"Hey, mom," stepping over a footprint, "what's that star?"
I have. Most observatories have the equipment.
Why is it that re-building the Saturn-5 is impossible today?
Money.
Or, to be more precise, it's not impossible, just pointless.
Technology as advanced considerably since the 1960's. NASA has become a political tool instead of a military organization and is thrashing about for a mission, and bleeding funds while doing it.
If we had sufficient reason to need a booster with the capability of the Saturn V, Northrop/Grumman or Boeing would have no trouble building one once properly funded to do so.
"Have you seen a laser beam reflected from the moon?"
Yes.
We lost the keys to the blueprints' file cabinet. It's sad.
I suppose that you also belive that we control the weather with machines in washington DC..
You may want to pull you cap down a little the tinfoil is showing.
Hey Dark,
Come check out this lunatic's thread....
"Have you seen a laser beam reflected from the moon?"
Yes. Hell, I've done it as an amateur astonomy experiment.
"Why is it that re-building the Saturn-5 is impossible today?"
Because they destroyed the jigs and other tooling necessary, because nobody makes 1960s-vintage computer hardware anymore, because nobody writes code for 1960s hardware anymore (and they didn't save the source code), because the Saturn V was designed and built before environmental regulation ran amok...
Well one of the reasons is that the engineering drawings no longer exist. These were the days before CAD-CAM so all those prints had to be kept in an environmentally-controlled warehouse. Usually the gov't votes to stop preserving the tooling & drawings at the request of the manufacturers -- who would love to design & build the next generation.
You can make a lot more money on engineering studies than you can actually building what you designed...
Because this guy said so?
Wanted you guys to see this...
It was a hoax.
I watched them film it in my back yard in Central Pennsylvania just before I went blind from the moonshine!
Cost, retooling, and the technology is way out of date. Try to find all the companies that made the parts for that behemouth.
It's not, but why do you say it is? It won't be rebuilt, but an even better launch system is already in late design phases.
The one thing the doubters don't understand is that going to the moon was relatively simple. Funding it was hard.
Why did you post this tinfoil garbage to begin with?