Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

SUSAN ESTRICH MOCKED ON EBAY FOR REFUSING TO SPEAK WITH BILL CLINTON RAPE VICTIM JUANITA BROADDRICK
DFU/EBAY | 10-22-05 | Doug from Upland

Posted on 10/22/2005 2:31:46 PM PDT by doug from upland

ATTN ADMIN MODERATOR - no link here to the ad, just the content of the description. I hope that is okay.

=========================================================================

ESTRICH REFUSES TO SPEAK WITH BROADDRICK

=========================================================================

SUSAN ESTRICH REFUSES TO SPEAK WITH RAPE VICTIM JUANITA BROADDRICK

NOTE:  You are bidding on a print out from my computer of three emails and an unforgettable picture (see below) of Clinton defender and professor of law Susan Estrich arranged in a frame and signed by Doug from Upland (my screen name on FreeRepublic.com and caller name on talk radio).

Juanita Broaddrick, known as Jane Doe No. 5 during the Clinton Impeachment, appeared on an historic NBC interview with Lisa Myers, broadcast on Feb. 24, 1999.  Yes, NBC delayed the broadcast until after the Impeachment vote in the Senate.  In the interview, Broaddrick discussed her accusation of rape against the then attorney general of Arkansas, Bill Clinton.  Overwhelmingly, those who saw the interview believed her charges.

Democratic political operative Estrich, as you may recall, was responsible for the hilarious photo-op of Michael Dukakis in the tank looking like a silly little boy playing grownup.  Political pundits are still debating which is the silliest photo-op ever.  Is it Dukakis in the tank or John F. Kerry crawling out of the space capsule looking like a little blue bunny or, as some have suggested, a blue sperm character from a Woody Allen movie?

DESCRIPTION OF THE FRAMED PRESENTATION:

1. Email challenge to Estrich to speak with fellow rape victim and Bill Clinton accuser Juanita Broaddrick.

2. Email of the good news to Estrich that Broaddrick contacted me and was looking forward to a meeting with Estrich.

3. Email from Estrich responding:  "not interested"

4. Unforgettable picture of Estrich

Note:  from the emails, I reserve the right to redact my personal phone number and cell phone number.

BACKGROUND:  There is a chance that this offering could become historic memorabilia.  On Oct. 11, 2005, Estrich was plugging her new Hillary book on the Sean Hannity show.  Hannity confronted her about Broaddrick's very credible rape accusation.  Estrich, herself a rape victim, didn't believe Broaddrick.  In her eyes, Broaddrick is apparently a liar.  How does Estrich know?  Well, she had a conversation with Clinton, and he told her he didn't do it.

Let's see if we have this correct.  Clinton lied to his wife, lied to his daughter, lied to reporters, lied to his supporters, lied to the grand jury, lied to his secretary, lied to his cabinet, lied to his dog Buddy, and lied to all of us while pointing his finger at us and telling us he was going to get back to work for the American people.  Gee, Bill, what kind of work would that be?  Defending this nation?  Despite all of the lies, by some cosmic miracle that is beyond the comprehension of man, he would never, never, never lie to Susan Estrich.  Is that reasonably accurrate?

I attempted to set up a conversation between Estrich and Broaddrick because of the comments made by Estrich on the Hannity show.  Certainly, the fair minded law professor Estrich would want to hear Broaddrick's side of the story, wouldn't she?  After each of two phone conversations with Estrich's secretary, I followed up with an email.  Broaddrick was willing.  Unfortunately, Estrich would have nothing to do with it. 

You can make your own determination regarding why Estrich refuses to speak with Broaddrick.  Could it be that Estrich will be forced to confront the truth?  If she confronts the truth, what would she do about her support of Bill and Hillary?  We all know that, behind the scenes, it was Hillary working feverishly to destroy the women who dared come forward to tell their stories.  That threatened her political power.  You might have never seen it on Brokaw, Jennings, and Rather, but many of those who came forward to tell their stories were audited by the IRS.

Estrich is a lawyer and a law professor who trains prospective lawyers.  She knows the importance of hearing all sides and seeing all the evidence.  But in this case, political power and agenda seem more important than the truth.  It is ironic.  A rape victim refuses to speak with a fellow rape victim.  Instead, she takes the side of the accused rapist in public forums.

Report of Sean Hannity show appearance - http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1500726/posts

Report of original challenge to Estrich - http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1504364/posts

Report that Broaddrick is willing to meet - http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1505356/posts

Report of Estrich refusal - http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1506863/posts

 PS - Early in 2006, look for the documentary film, INDICTING HILLARY.  www.HillCAP.org  How much do you know about the largest campaign finance fraud on record?

 


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: broaddrick; clinton; douggetalife; enabler; estrich; hillary; sexualpredator
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-169 last
To: doug from upland

Yep, passed that same Buddhist temple many times down Hacienda Blvd. and think about the Asian bribes in our Presidential election all the time.


161 posted on 10/25/2005 6:27:17 PM PDT by A CA Guy (God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
I was looking and that still needs to be posted on Ebay.

Your up to nearly 1000 views. So you gained a third more views since yesterday and your bids have increased value by almost 50%. Pretty darn good!
162 posted on 10/25/2005 6:34:36 PM PDT by A CA Guy (God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies]

To: A CA Guy

I used to have an office in Whitter and I lived in La Habra Heights for awhile. I remember that place.


163 posted on 10/25/2005 6:37:10 PM PDT by doug from upland (David Kendall -- protecting the Clintons one lie at a time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 161 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

BUMPUS PUKUS MARMADUKUS


164 posted on 10/25/2005 6:57:23 PM PDT by Fester Chugabrew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

I think it might have been pulled by Ebay Doug.

I tried you link and it said the offer was pulled.


165 posted on 10/26/2005 5:00:53 PM PDT by A CA Guy (God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies]

To: A CA Guy

It was pulled. I logged onto MyEBay and the alert said it was a "deceptive headline." I will change it and repost. Susan, you can run but you can't hide.


166 posted on 10/26/2005 6:21:50 PM PDT by doug from upland (David Kendall -- protecting the Clintons one lie at a time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 165 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

Give it a 20 day auction.


167 posted on 10/26/2005 6:24:31 PM PDT by A CA Guy (God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
It was pulled. I logged onto MyEBay and the alert said it was a "deceptive headline." I will change it and repost. Susan, you can run but you can't hide.

EBay removed the Estarich email response? Let's try and think of why they might have done that:

a) EBay is an online auction service, not a political website.
b) Putting Susan Estrich's email response up for bid on EBay was an asinine idea that only helps turn a past event into a caricature of the awful tragedy it really was.

168 posted on 10/28/2005 11:10:41 AM PDT by jla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
...and you really need to start putting disclaimers onto all of your tomfoolery. Something along the lines of:

Disclaimer: This [enter description of latest DFU attention-getting, sophomoric antic here] is being done without the support or endorsement of 99.8% of conservatives. It is entirely an act that arose from the inner sanctum of the grey matter between my ears, and mine alone.

169 posted on 10/28/2005 11:20:58 AM PDT by jla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-169 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson