RUMSFELD-ASHCROFT '08
WIN ONE FOR THE GIPPER
IF KERRY IS THE ANSWER, IT MUST HAVE BEEN A STUPID QUESTION
1 posted on
10/16/2005 8:45:03 AM PDT by
KenKong77
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-57 next last
To: KenKong77
2 posted on
10/16/2005 8:45:29 AM PDT by
MikefromOhio
(Pwner of Noobs)
To: KenKong77
To: KenKong77
ANY FREE-THINKING CONSERVATIVES TROLLS HERE?Yep... IBTZ
6 posted on
10/16/2005 8:46:54 AM PDT by
pageonetoo
(You'll spot their posts soon enough!)
To: KenKong77
RUMSFELD-ASHCROFT '08
BTW - Rummy is going to be looking forward to retirement and Ashcroft would get SKEWERED.....
7 posted on
10/16/2005 8:47:00 AM PDT by
MikefromOhio
(Pwner of Noobs)
To: KenKong77
Hmmm...it would require some time, but I know if you browse through FR you will find a great many FReepers opposed to the nomination of Ms Miers. You'll also find many who either support it, or are waiting for the hearings.
Any more questions?
9 posted on
10/16/2005 8:47:36 AM PDT by
SE Mom
(God Bless those who serve..)
To: KenKong77
I dunno, but something about your conservative zeal just reminds me of John Candy in the film, Volunteers.
Thank you, Tom...
13 posted on
10/16/2005 8:48:12 AM PDT by
RepoGirl
("The only ho I'm pimpin' is Sweet Lady Propane." -- Hank Hill)
To: KenKong77
The only necessary condition for nomination is that the President made it
The only other necessary condition for being on the court is being confirmed
All other considerations are political in nature.
To: KenKong77
I fail to understand the meaning of your posting. You should consider thinking, first. You should also consider making your points on some of the hundreds of already existing threads...
17 posted on
10/16/2005 8:48:41 AM PDT by
pageonetoo
(You'll spot their posts soon enough!)
To: KenKong77
I'm gonna go out on a limb here and guess that not only is the President of the United States smarter than you, he is also more familiar with the process, as well as with Ms. Miers.
At this point, I'll take his side over yours. Thanks, though.
19 posted on
10/16/2005 8:48:58 AM PDT by
teenyelliott
(Soylent green should be made outta liberals...)
To: KenKong77
I'm sort of a free-thinker. I think it's better not to go over that cliff with the lemmings who say Miers is bad, and reserve judgement for myself based on her hearings. They haven't happened yet. Jumping on a bandwagon without any basis but the opinions of others isn't a good way to demonstrate "good" thinking. Free-thinking and good thinking should be synonomous but frequently, they aren't.
20 posted on
10/16/2005 8:49:13 AM PDT by
vharlow
(http://www.vventures.net)
To: KenKong77
I see trouble on the horizon
24 posted on
10/16/2005 8:49:31 AM PDT by
tiredoflaundry
(I'm still hot , now it just comes in flashes! WBB)
To: KenKong77
Gee Mr Soros, nice of you to fan the flames. Been here a month and this is about your 10th one of these?? Let's here about your support of the Iraq war?? Get Lost!
Pray for W and Our Freedom Winning Troops
25 posted on
10/16/2005 8:49:31 AM PDT by
bray
(Islam IS a terrorist organization)
To: KenKong77
So you define people who have knee-jerk reactions and follow the pack as free thinkers.
Ok.
28 posted on
10/16/2005 8:50:01 AM PDT by
Harmless Teddy Bear
(Warning: Not a Romantic or hero worshiper. Attempts to tug at my heartstrings annoy me... and I bite)
To: Darksheare
29 posted on
10/16/2005 8:50:08 AM PDT by
Sam Cree
(absolute reality)
To: KenKong77
She will be/is a STRICT CONTRUCTIONIST, A White Protestant Southerner, has been the power behind all the "great judges" W has appointed. Now go join your liberal friends!
31 posted on
10/16/2005 8:50:26 AM PDT by
Blake#1
To: KenKong77
Aw c'mon you're overdoing the attempt to look like a conservative, really.
(In before the ZOT)
35 posted on
10/16/2005 8:51:31 AM PDT by
ElkGroveDan
(California bashers will be called out)
To: KenKong77
Because she meets all Constitutional qualifications.
38 posted on
10/16/2005 8:52:18 AM PDT by
Harmless Teddy Bear
(Warning: Not a Romantic or hero worshiper. Attempts to tug at my heartstrings annoy me... and I bite)
To: KenKong77
People on these threads have been bitching about Meyers overwhelmingly, so I don't know where you've been.
Considering the USSC justices that have completely dumped the 2nd and 4th Amendments and have ruled that local government can take away your house & lot at whim and give it to Wal-Mart, I'm not real impressed with the current selection process and who has been getting screened through, so how has GW Bush done such a terrible thing here? Maybe a person should be selected based on personal qualities instead of their resume. The conventional process sure isn't making it.
To: KenKong77
Free thinker here.
And I support (so far) the Meirs nomination.
To: KenKong77
...I see Frank Constanza has found FreeRepublic and has decided TO POST IN YELLING MODE.
STOP IT, FRANK. You're killing us.
serenity now...serenity now...
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-57 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson