Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 10/06/2005 3:19:45 PM PDT by Defendingliberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last
To: Defendingliberty

In a word. Wrong.


2 posted on 10/06/2005 3:22:48 PM PDT by Patrick1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Defendingliberty

I wish it were that machiavellian. But I don't think so.


3 posted on 10/06/2005 3:24:07 PM PDT by Argus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Defendingliberty
Harriet Miers will be confirmed quite easily - She will be a fine justice (and history will be kind to GWB for this pick).

GWB will seat a third SCOUTS justice in 07 (possible JRB).

4 posted on 10/06/2005 3:25:26 PM PDT by SevenMinusOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Defendingliberty; 4CJ

ping


5 posted on 10/06/2005 3:26:04 PM PDT by NameItClaimIt (Birkenstocks, Subarus, and Tree-hugging)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Defendingliberty

Interesting theory, but the dems seem thrilled with this woman. That's the only part that worries me.


6 posted on 10/06/2005 3:26:45 PM PDT by somemoreequalthanothers (All for the betterment of "the state", comrade)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Defendingliberty
What would you think of Bush if he put forth one of his life-long confidants just for show?

I'd think he was a cruel human being. Bush is not cruel.

Harriett Miers is going to be on the Supreme Court. Since you want to "take it to the bank," I'm willing to put some serious money on that.

7 posted on 10/06/2005 3:26:54 PM PDT by sinkspur (Breed every trace of the American Staffordshire Terrier out of existence!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Defendingliberty

You know, a lot of detractors say that she is
not qualified, because she has not been a judge,
or argued before the SCOTUS before, as if the
President had picked a law school gradutuate
from East Crawford Technical and Law School,
or the White House Flower Lady... The woman
is a long time practicing *lawyer*, who has been
swimming in the shark infested waters of DC legal
community, for almost 5 years, not to mention in
Texas, and has not only managed to keep herself
and her primary client, the President, from being
legally mauled, but the the West Wing &
Executive Branch as well.

Trying to pretend that she is some kind of
legal neophyte, just beggars reality if you
sit down and actually think about what she's
been doing over the last 20 years.

Not familiar with the SCOTUS proceedures and
legal precedents?? I doubt a week has gone
by since she joined GW's staff, that she hasn't
had to deal with at least *one* issue with
SCOTUS ramifications.

Unqualified???...I think that's a charge that
is going to be a *lot* harder to make stick
than her detractors may *assume*.


8 posted on 10/06/2005 3:27:02 PM PDT by NickatNite2003
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Defendingliberty
It never ceases to amaze me the level of intricacy that Freepers can develop in concluding that things really aren't what they seem to be. The exact opposite is true. Miers is a slam dunk, after the hands-off press conference of Harry Reid on Monday afternoon.

Nice try, but no cigar.

Congressman Billybob

Latest column: "Harriet Miers and the 'Pigpen' Press"

9 posted on 10/06/2005 3:27:17 PM PDT by Congressman Billybob (President Bush plays chess while his opponents are playing checkers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Defendingliberty
Well, now that you told them the plan, they just might go ahead and vote her in.

Nice job, pal.

;)

10 posted on 10/06/2005 3:27:37 PM PDT by Michael.SF. ('That was the gift the president gave us, the gift of happiness, of being together,' Cindy Sheehan")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Defendingliberty

I've heard that before. Last time I heard that, we ended up with BCRA as SCOTUS-affirmed law. If true this represents an astonishing level of irresponsibility, because she just might get confirmed anyway.


11 posted on 10/06/2005 3:28:04 PM PDT by thoughtomator (Corporatism is not conservatism - don't mistake this President for a conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Defendingliberty

On FoxNews:

Dan Coats, former Rep, has been hired to ramrod the Miers nomination through.

In his interview with Brit Hume, he is all in favor of her, but....

==no he hasn't met her
==no he doesn't know her personally, but he will have his first meeting with her tomorrow
==no he doesn't know much about her legal career


12 posted on 10/06/2005 3:28:39 PM PDT by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Defendingliberty
The right does not yet support this candidate because she doesn’t seem to have the conservative pedigree they desire.

The elitist snob right does not support this candidate because of the pedigree. You're right about that.

There's much more support for Harriett Miers outside the East Coast than you may think.

13 posted on 10/06/2005 3:28:57 PM PDT by sinkspur (Breed every trace of the American Staffordshire Terrier out of existence!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Defendingliberty
With that in mind the President knows the Democrats are going to have the long knives out for Supreme Court nominee number two.

Well, they aren't having to use them, some folks on the right are doing their dirty work for them. So if Miers withdraws, those knives will be good and sharp for the next nominee.

14 posted on 10/06/2005 3:30:03 PM PDT by dirtboy (Drool overflowed my buffer...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Defendingliberty
Two things:

First, all GOP senators who have said anything about Miers have only good thing to say. The assumption that the "right" does not support this candidate is a stretch. At best, the "right" you refer to is divided. But in the end, all the GOP senate will vote for her nomination.

Secondly, on the DemoRATS side, they will be as neutered as they were with Roberts. She will be extremely difficult to attack.

End result: Associate Supreme Court Justice Harriet Meirs.

And by the way, I would like to know what you are smoking...must be some really good stuff.

15 posted on 10/06/2005 3:30:17 PM PDT by el_texicano (Liberals, Socialist, DemocRATS, all touchy, feely, mind numbed robots)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Defendingliberty

No, I don't think so. She'll be on the court, and I think the President expects her to be confirmed. At least I hope he does - I'd hate to think of the Supreme Court being used for silly political games.

It's also too great a risk to try something like this, hoping she'll be rejected. Plus, it's almost cruel to her if that was his intention.


16 posted on 10/06/2005 3:30:29 PM PDT by Bubbatuck (Demonrats: The End is Near!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Defendingliberty
Would someone want to put their entire life out there for the media and the dems to rake over just to serve as anyones straw candidate? Not likely.
19 posted on 10/06/2005 3:31:14 PM PDT by asp1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Defendingliberty

I'm no Miers supporter, but:

1.  W wouldn't sacrifice one of his buddies.  He's loyal to a (major) fault.

2.  If the D's took this candidate down, what possible chance would a Janice Rogers Brown have?  He'll have lost his political capital and the 7 idiots wouldn't line up to support a true C.

Miers is in.  Let's hope W knows what he's doing (not a given).  Maybe Stevens or Ginz (oh, Lord, let it be Ginz) steps down in the next couple of years and Janice Rogers Brown is W's next pick.

Sorry, but it's the best we can realistically hope for.

Owl_Eagle

(If what I just wrote makes you sad or angry,

 it was probably sarcasm)

20 posted on 10/06/2005 3:33:48 PM PDT by End Times Sentinel (In Memory of my Dear Friend Henry Lee II)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Defendingliberty

The machavellian plot is that this woman has assured GWB that she is a strict constructionist and he knows what she thinks about abortion.


21 posted on 10/06/2005 3:33:49 PM PDT by pissant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Defendingliberty

Wow, another vanity that could have been posted on one the the 276 existing threads.


22 posted on 10/06/2005 3:33:51 PM PDT by KingKongCobra (Trying to save the "Donner Party" from themselves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Defendingliberty

Herriet Miers will strictly interpret our Constitution and will not legislate from the bench. She will represented the midwest conservative and knows rural Baptist America.


27 posted on 10/06/2005 3:40:15 PM PDT by FreeRep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson