Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Important Observation About JetBlue Landing
News | September 21, 2005 | me

Posted on 09/21/2005 8:25:21 PM PDT by HighWheeler

After looking carfully at the replays of the JetBlue landing tonight, I noticed during landing that the nosegear flames and fires were pulsing on and off during the landing. The flames became quite fierce during the "roll"out of the aircraft, but would diminish and suddenly flame-on strongly again.

If you watch the landing carefully, you will see the times that the flames pulse on are the moments when the nose gear is scraping on the painted stripe on the runway.

This is very significant.

The FAA, airlines and manufacturers are always concerned with fire and especially fire avoidance and fire suppression. Fire is the number one enemy of ships, aircraft, and buildings. The fact that the tarmac paint could erupt in flames is a highly significant observation, especially where sources of flames are always a priority in accident investigation.

Imagine if there had been any available fuel source from the plane associated with this landing, leaking fuel, hydraulic fluid, or lubricant. The outcome could instead have been a significant disaster. The FAA and these airfields will need to find a far less flamable paint for these stripes.


TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: airlinesafety; flight292; jetblue
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-87 last
To: HighWheeler

I agree with your assessment. Good observation.


81 posted on 09/22/2005 5:42:26 AM PDT by Jet Jaguar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: darkwing104

Have you seen this thread? Interesting read.


82 posted on 09/22/2005 6:05:52 AM PDT by Jet Jaguar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: HighWheeler; Aeronaut

ping


83 posted on 09/22/2005 6:07:06 AM PDT by Jet Jaguar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HighWheeler

I'm sure some of the flames came from burning hydraulic fluid.


84 posted on 09/22/2005 8:37:16 AM PDT by FReepaholic (I don't look good naked anymore.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: zipper
...I'm still trying to figure out why they didn't foam the runway...

I read that they don't do that anymore because they found that the aircraft would lose directional control on the slick surface.

85 posted on 09/22/2005 8:38:48 AM PDT by FReepaholic (I don't look good naked anymore.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Jet Jaguar

Thanks. I hope the FAA and NTSB do something about this. this seems easy to fix.


86 posted on 09/22/2005 6:17:36 PM PDT by HighWheeler (RATS hero is an impeached, dis-barred, lying, perjuring, cheating, lazy, cowardly sexual predator)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: HighWheeler
observation confirmed. sometimes posting here -- even posting the obvious -- can be like throwing meat to a pack of hungry hyenas.

on the other hand, how often would this be an issue?

87 posted on 09/22/2005 8:19:18 PM PDT by CaptainKeyword (keyword alert)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-87 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson