Skip to comments.
Important Observation About JetBlue Landing
News
| September 21, 2005
| me
Posted on 09/21/2005 8:25:21 PM PDT by HighWheeler
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-87 next last
To: HighWheeler
Next time try a series post.
Yeah, the painted strip might ignite the whole LA basin.
2
posted on
09/21/2005 8:26:39 PM PDT
by
steve86
(@)
To: HighWheeler
The sparks were caused by friction of the metal parts of the nose gear contacting the cement. I don't think the paint on the runway entered into it.
3
posted on
09/21/2005 8:27:37 PM PDT
by
SamAdams76
(What Would Howard Roarke Do?)
To: HighWheeler
Good Point, Is there such a Non Flammable Paint the will withstand all those TA/L and be cost effective ?????
4
posted on
09/21/2005 8:27:47 PM PDT
by
cmsgop
( I DON'T C.A.I.R. !!!!!!!!!)
To: HighWheeler
Very good observation. I too noticed it and mentioned it to grandpa. He said the paint was burning even though the commentators kept saying the tires were on fire. It was quite obvious.
To: HighWheeler
6
posted on
09/21/2005 8:29:04 PM PDT
by
HighWheeler
(RATS hero is an impeached, dis-barred, lying, perjuring, cheating, lazy, cowardly sexual predator)
To: SamAdams76
I don't think the paint on the runway entered into it. Sure it did. Paint is flammable.
To: HighWheeler
I was under the impression that emergency services had sprayed down the tarmac w/ anti-flammatory chemicals, and that these bursts of sparks were when the tire stem hit less saturated areas.
8
posted on
09/21/2005 8:29:30 PM PDT
by
Shqipo
(And so the great battle starts...)
To: BearWash
check the video, then make your comment.
9
posted on
09/21/2005 8:30:16 PM PDT
by
HighWheeler
(RATS hero is an impeached, dis-barred, lying, perjuring, cheating, lazy, cowardly sexual predator)
To: HighWheeler
This may also ahve been the ground up magnesium of the wheels being scattered and burning and maybe just coincidental that the wheels/gear was centered over the stripes.
10
posted on
09/21/2005 8:31:36 PM PDT
by
umgud
(Comment removed by poster before moderator could get to it)
To: HighWheeler
You sure it wasn't the other way around that the paint stopped the sparks and the landing gear only sparked when it hit bare tarmac?
11
posted on
09/21/2005 8:31:37 PM PDT
by
satchmodog9
(Murder and weather are our only news)
To: HighWheeler
Stripes were flaming up alright
To: satchmodog9
Did you look at the video? Check again.
To: satchmodog9
Yeah watch the video. I think he mas made a good observation.
To: HighWheeler
If the wheel is made of aluminum, then the fire was probably caused by a combination of aluminum dust and rubber which burns like a blow torch. These just happen to be two key ingredients for making certain types of rocket fuel.
15
posted on
09/21/2005 8:33:49 PM PDT
by
COEXERJ145
(Cindy Sheehan, Pat Buchanan, John Conyers, and David Duke Are Just Different Sides of the Same Coin.)
To: spycatcher
16
posted on
09/21/2005 8:33:49 PM PDT
by
cmsgop
( I DON'T C.A.I.R. !!!!!!!!!)
To: SamAdams76
I agree-- the nosewheel wasn't exactly on centerline-- it wasn't paint on fire at all. It was sparks from metal on concrete, sparks that appeared to flare up and then subside, probably in time with the weight of the aircraft shifting up and down on the nosewheel assembly as the aircraft slowed.
Notice he used most of the runway that was about 10,000 feet long-- I don't think he used any brakes, since the weight would have shifted forward onto the nosewheel, causing the gear to dig in and making it more likely for the nose gear to collapse.
He did an outstanding job, all considered.
17
posted on
09/21/2005 8:34:31 PM PDT
by
zipper
(Freedom Isn't Free)
To: SamAdams76
Watch the video and keep in mind at what points the flare-ups occur and when they stop..
It seems to be all related to whether the gear was on the painted portion of runway or the unpainted.
It was like a light switch turning on and off.
To: umgud
I'm not sure the color was right for magnesium.
The amazing thing to me is that the front strut still functioned after all that -- you would think the heat would boil the fluid and seize it.
19
posted on
09/21/2005 8:34:47 PM PDT
by
steve86
(@)
To: cmsgop
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-87 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson