Now why did they have to go and publish this? Sheesh, next thing you know the women will be wearing Hillary-esque pantsuits. Blech!
1 posted on
08/09/2005 5:28:54 PM PDT by
pissant
To: pissant
Pissant, pissant. Search is your friend. Then again, this was posted under a different title, so you can't be blaimed.
2 posted on
08/09/2005 5:34:03 PM PDT by
Asphalt
(Join my NFL ping list! FReepmail me| The best things in life aren't things)
To: pissant
because chivalry is "benevolent sexism" that advances the stereotype that women are vulnerable and weak.I can't wait to tell my wife that !!!!!!
3 posted on
08/09/2005 5:34:15 PM PDT by
dfwddr
To: pissant
"Now why did they have to go and publish this?"
Exactly. Can't people keep their mouths shut?:-)
4 posted on
08/09/2005 5:35:11 PM PDT by
gate2wire
(We Honor Those Who Serve---WE REMEMBER--Thank you)
To: pissant
Brief said the study goes so far as to suggest that women should even be careful about letting men open doors, because chivalry is "benevolent sexism" that advances the stereotype that women are vulnerable and weak. Pure BS. Women can take control by expecting men to hold the door for them, and using the tilt hand technique to control a handshake. Using femininity to control is not the same as being an office slut.
8 posted on
08/09/2005 5:40:50 PM PDT by
D Rider
To: pissant
This includes ... leaning over a table to let men look down their shirts Pissant, ssssshhhhhhh!!! Come on, man, whatcha tryin' to do??? =)
9 posted on
08/09/2005 5:42:02 PM PDT by
softwarecreator
(Facts are to liberals as holy water is to vampires)
To: pissant
next thing you know the women will be wearing Hillary-esque pantsuits. Blech! Great, now I have this mental image.
11 posted on
08/09/2005 5:43:19 PM PDT by
softwarecreator
(Facts are to liberals as holy water is to vampires)
To: pissant
"Women who send flirtatious emails, wear short skirts or massage a man's shoulders at the workplace win fewer pay raises and promotions"
Don't believe this ladies, this must be some terrible, feminazi propaganda.
13 posted on
08/09/2005 5:43:35 PM PDT by
gate2wire
(We Honor Those Who Serve---WE REMEMBER--Thank you)
To: Lil'freeper
14 posted on
08/09/2005 5:43:36 PM PDT by
big'ol_freeper
("Freedom consists not in doing what we like, but in having the right to do what we ought." Pope JPII)
To: pissant
"It was an attempt to make plain the negative consequences of such behaviour, the report said."
And how do they know that sex didn't help these girls get a promotion?
34 posted on
08/09/2005 5:53:34 PM PDT by
TAquinas
(Demographics has consequences.)
To: pissant
Tulane professor Arthur Brief found no evidence showing such behaviour to be effective or ineffective. If he were to marry Barbara Boxer, She would be Barbara Boxer-Brief?
36 posted on
08/09/2005 5:54:00 PM PDT by
N. Theknow
(Be a glowworm. A glowworm's never glum. How can you be grumpy when the sun shines out your bum?)
To: pissant
Tulane professor Arthur Brief found no evidence showing such behaviour to be effective or ineffective. Sounds like sour grapes on the part of the Prof...
One wonders whether he lives "up" to his name?
49 posted on
08/09/2005 6:00:08 PM PDT by
mikrofon
(Short timer)
To: pissant
...chivalry is "benevolent sexism" that advances the stereotype that women are vulnerable and weakWOW! Sir Walter Raleigh is just so out of touch with reality! Poor guy.
To: pissant
By the way, where are the pictures?!
71 posted on
08/09/2005 6:13:15 PM PDT by
wagglebee
("We are ready for the greatest achievements in the history of freedom." -- President Bush, 1/20/05)
To: pissant
Brief said the study goes so far as to suggest that women should even be careful about letting men open doors, because chivalry is "benevolent sexism" that advances the stereotype that women are vulnerable and weak.
What women feel let down when a man does this?? If there is any out there please call 1-800-GET-A-CLUE
When men do this for me when I'm downtown with my CEO "rubbing elbows" with the movers and shakers my first thought is these gentlemen have been raised correctly and my sons better always do it!!!
74 posted on
08/09/2005 6:15:40 PM PDT by
PaulaB
To: pissant
James Taranto of the Wall Street Journal pointed out the obvious omission from this study. It does not mention anything about the age of the women. Older women are likely to make more money than younger women, and younger women are more likely to flirt. I didn't believe this hooey from the beginning, knew there had to be a catch.
http://www.opinionjournal.com/best/?id=110007082
To: pissant
My short skirt got me the job in the first place.....
Now, 13 years later....I run the place in my underpants!
103 posted on
08/09/2005 6:47:48 PM PDT by
Feiny
(Practice random and senseless acts.)
To: pissant
The women in the study, the first of its kind, ranged in the age of mid-20 to 60 years, the 'USA Today' reported.
Hey baby, you lookin' for a date?
120 posted on
08/09/2005 7:24:57 PM PDT by
mvpel
(Michael Pelletier)
To: pissant
Many think they are hot and sexy, but often today they have a gut hanging over their mini skirts, so they look like $4 hookers.
Yep, not gong to get them a promotion at all.
128 posted on
08/09/2005 7:53:33 PM PDT by
A CA Guy
(God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson