He goes on to say that the name is Mary Ann Glendon. After googling her, she seems to be quite Pro-Life and conservative on the family/social issues. Not much on other areas of the law(RKBA, federalism, 1st amendment, judicial review, etc...) She was appointed by JPII two a pontifical council so I'm not sure how that would play, given the dems anti-Christianity stance. Also, she is 67, but, given that W might appoint a woman, it's worthwhile to considewr it. Brown is probably toof resh from being appointed to the DC Circuit, and Jones has a bunch of stuff that the Libs could cry about, Clement is sort of an unknown, and you don't want a Souter. I think a woman and either a Luttig/Roberts/Garza to replace Rhenquist is a likely possibility. So, just wondering what you all think.
1 posted on
07/16/2005 12:17:59 PM PDT by
jeltz25
To: jeltz25
You haven't been paying attention. NO ONE who is "67 years old" is going to be appointed to any Associate Justice position on the Court, regardless of who he, she, or it is. In the words of the Sopranos, "fuggitaboutit."
Congressman Billybob
Latest column: "The Fry Cook Rule for the Supreme Court"
2 posted on
07/16/2005 12:26:31 PM PDT by
Congressman Billybob
(Will President Bush appoint a Justice who obeys the Constitution? I give 85-15 odds on yes.)
To: jeltz25
What practicing Catholics are being considered?
3 posted on
07/16/2005 12:30:26 PM PDT by
ex-snook
(Protectionism is Patriotism in both war and trade.)
To: jeltz25
How about a nominee who is a constitutional lawyer, woman, pro-life, pro-second ammendment, who is also young?
Nominate Ann Coulter!
5 posted on
07/16/2005 12:34:05 PM PDT by
Hugin
To: jeltz25
Glendon is very, very shaky.
We could lose ground with her. The New Republic loves her.
Do more research!!!
6 posted on
07/16/2005 1:27:10 PM PDT by
TitansAFC
("It would be a hard government that should tax its people 1/10th part of their income."-Ben Franklin)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson