Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mad As Hell VIII: Appliance Versus Theory of Everything
Security Awareness for Ma, Pa and the Corporate Clueless ^ | Thursday, July 14, 2005 | Winn Schwartau

Posted on 07/14/2005 8:22:03 AM PDT by Swordmaker

It’s been a while. I have no excuse. Except, my Mac works.

I have not spent one minute (well maybe one) worrying about viruses, spyware or ANY of the usual WinTel crap. I have saved, I figger, in 10 weeks, at least 20 hours of time, not including crashes which means multiples of days.

Last night, in a hotel in Vancouver, I doubled checked my stealthiness, and all is good.

I have been to no less than 2 dozen networks in the last couple of weeks, and I have never needed to configure to them. I have saved at least 6-10 hours of time.

I have lost a few seconds here and there because my fingers still ‘think’ Windows commands, but that is my ancient brain rewiring itself. I have not used my PC in three weeks.

My PC-worry factor is now next to nil, and that is a strange feeling, indeed! It takes a while to get used to the fact that things just work.

Many of the Linux adapters have it right, IMHO.

Here again underscores the increasing problems with WinTel platforms. As a culture we have been promised that our PCs will do everything for us. They will solve all of our problems, do anything we ask and just keep piling on the functions you want. It will be all right. Trust us. We are geeks.

BS.

We have a tendency to think adding more technology is the answer to solving our technology problems. From a systems and control view of the world this is sheer insanity. It is an especially foolish approach when the vast majority of your customers have just recently conquered push button phones and their VCR/DVDs still flash 12:00.

(BTW: In the security world, vendors are forever saying, “Our new blue widget will solve all of your security problems.” Bull. Remember PKI? $5M+ and for what? Fortezza? Expanding headers = non scalable. Or the infamous, “Add a firewall. That’ll protect us.” Then they get Sally in shipping to configure it. It IS people, people!)

Let’s say you own your own business. Or, better yet, let’s say I do, which I do: a security company. (Which if you remember, is why I began this long series of rants on why WinTel is a national security threat and a danger to your company)

If I were a one man shop, I would have to do almost everything myself… or, outsourced those things where I am not expert. As a larger company, I hire people who specialize in various disciplines. My HTML is good, but I can’t design graphics beyond stick figures. I can write, but our marketing and PR is done by people who specialize in that. My geek factor gets lower by the week as new technology is impossible to stay on top of, so I have a great team of engineers. I need a lawyer, an accountant… and so it goes.

But these damn computers! Think how much we pile on them to do. Everything.

One of security’s mantras is SPF – Single Point of Failure. If I concentrate too much workload and expectance of functionality in one place, when things fail (which by now you realize will happen) it all fails. At the desktop we add application after application, and expect the WinTel to perform perfectly. It can’t and it won’t.

We add patches to fix old problems. We build perimeters of security and embed them in applications and O/Ss. And all we end up doing is making the system more complex and ultimately, less reliable. It is inevitable.

How are Ma & Pa supposed to deal with this? They can’t and there is no reason that the computer industry should expect them to.

There is plenty of academic support for the thesis that WinTel will continue to fail as long as the current entropic thinking is maintained.

BILL BASH: The other day (mid May 2005) Gates said something like, (paraphrase) “iPod is a fad. Smart phones will take over and iPod will die.” This is the same philosophy of putting everything under one roof, or in one box, that is driving everyone nuts. It’s too much.

I like appliances. I have a phone that works like a phone. No pix. I have a camera for that. No IM. I have a computer for that. If one appliance dies (which they will) I am not SOL. I don’t like being SOL.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Computers/Internet
KEYWORDS: macintosh; madashell; osx4; switching

1 posted on 07/14/2005 8:22:04 AM PDT by Swordmaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Bush2000; antiRepublicrat; Action-America; eno_; Glenn; bentfeather; BigFinn; Brian Allen; byset; ..
Mad as Hell VIII: The Appliance Theory

Switching to Macs PING

If you want on or off the Mac Ping List, Freepmail me.

2 posted on 07/14/2005 8:24:29 AM PDT by Swordmaker (tagline now open, please ring bell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Temple Owl

ping


3 posted on 07/14/2005 8:53:55 AM PDT by Tribune7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

"Here again underscores the increasing problems with WinTel platforms. As a culture we have been promised that our PCs will do everything for us. They will solve all of our problems, do anything we ask and just keep piling on the functions you want"

I particularly enjoy the way they do things I don't want them to do, because some jackass in Redmond or elsewhere decided they should operate that way.

But, the same goes for OS X, BTW.


4 posted on 07/14/2005 10:08:07 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (last updated by FR profile on Tuesday, May 10, 2005.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Swordmaker
.... There is plenty of academic support for the thesis that WinTel will continue to fail as long as the current entropic thinking is maintained. ....

I have no clue what this doofus is talking about. I work with hundreds of Windows machines in the last month and aside from a little hair and grunge in a mouse wheel, no problems.

Ma and Pa have figured out the PC even though us geeks went to cry the sky is falling. Get to making the next useful thing and computer experts be important again. (And making new browsers to solve a problem that has been solved is not new.)
5 posted on 07/15/2005 9:17:36 PM PDT by Joe_October (Saddam supported Terrorists. Al Qaeda are Terrorists. I can't find the link.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson