Posted on 06/23/2005 5:49:40 AM PDT by franksolich
http://www.gentrylange.com/endorsements.html
This might be a surprise too; please notice time and date:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=104x3920760
Gentry Lange was campaign manager for The Red Round One in his failed bid for WA SOS/successful bid for campaign contributions.
54. All I have to say at this point is the drugs are rockin..Can't say much more than as I am so drugged I am having a hard time typing. This post took about 20 minutes to type...
LOL! I've got a new one:
The Mendacious Mendicant.
Or, the Mendacious Medicated Mendicant.
You know, sir, going through the archives at DUmmieland, one is suddenly confronted with an unusual question.
Why the DUmmiette sfexpat2000, who is in San Francisco and who has never met the imperial red round one before in her life, was in charge of making arrangements with Johns Hopkins for the imperial red round one.....when the friend of the imperial red round one, the DUmmie "Miss Waverly," already works at Johns Hopkins?
Why not use the person on the spot, to make the arrangements?
Just an idle thought, while combing the DUmmie archives.....
Could very well be; in fact because of her tendency to lapse into the same vocabulary as used by the imperial red round one, it is pretty certain that Miss Waverly is actually the plump potentate himself.
Notice that the genteel spinsterish Baltimore-rowhouse Miss Waverly sometimes falls into the habit of using Seattle longshoreman language.
Are all posts questioning Andy banned at DU?
I wonder if a FReeper mole mod would check out the IPs of certain posters at DU to see if they are actually the same person. I think the mods can see the IPs of the posters.
You are allowed to question how Andy is doing or if he still needs more gift cards to buy organic groceries.
But questions related to fundraising or proof of diagnoses are quickly sent to the memory hole.
SD
Well, I'd be squeamish about that, sir.
Not being computer-savvy, I myself don't know for sure, but I suspect that would be an invasion of privacy.
Or it might not be; I really do not know.
The Andyites gloat and boast about getting these things, but we play by the rules, aboveboard and out front. And if we're not sure something is aboveboard and legal, we don't do it.
The Andyites, especially dirty ben, claim to have "a lot" on computer-ignorant me, but I haven't seen none of it accurate, or even close.
The Andyites, especially dirty ben, claim to know "everything" about me, but so far it looks as if they can't tell me from Clare Booth Luce.
1. Scam artists want to work under the radar. If Stephenson made his solicitation for money on 200 message boards, how would this "scam artist" have expected to escape the intense scrutiny that goes with widespread blogosphere publicity?
1. Scam artists want to work under the radar. If Stephenson made his solicitation for money on 200 message boards, how would this "scam artist" have expected to escape the intense scrutiny that goes with widespread blogosphere publicity?
2. See No. 1, except add to it widespread radio network coverage.
3. See No. 1, except add to it widespread e-mail forwarding.
Right from the top, it is clear this "truthseeker" is out of his element. How, oh how? could this escape the scrutiny of the super-smart "progressive" community?
Perhaps by Lock, Ban, Delete and an intimidation scheme against anyone who questions.
It's sad how childish the "progressive" community is. If just one evil FReeper raises a question, they circle the wagons around one of "their own" and refuse to listen to anything else.
SD
Well now, that can be subjected to another interpretation, "working under the radar."
Remember, the DUmmies, especially the Andyites, weren't even aware the DUmmie FUnnies existed until late May 2005--despite that the DUmmie FUnnies are one of the most-popular features of Free Republic.....and Free Republic itself being four times the size of DUmmieland.
It's, uh, sort of hard to avoid seeing an elephant in the back seat.....that is, unless one voluntarily chooses NOT to see the elephant.
The beginning of this whole scenario--which is sure to be made into a book (although the main culprit will be differently-named, so as to deny the plump potentate the "glory" of notoriety)--reminds me very much of four affluent well-taken-care-of elderly widows gathering for their weekly bridge-game, in an affluent living-room, which is surrounded on all four sides by very large windows, drapes open.
So the DUmmiette sfexpat2000, and the DUmmies flyarm--er, I mean the four rich old women, play their game of bridge, utterly preoccupied with yik-yakking local gossip, totally oblivious to the wide world outside all those windows.
And then suddenly a tornado rips through the house, and they all act very upset and surprised.....
It just goes down hill from there.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.