Posted on 06/18/2005 8:23:43 AM PDT by tuffydoodle
Girl, 15, Sues School Nurse Over Pregnancy Test Lawsuit Claims San Marcos Student's Privacy, Rights Violated
AUSTIN, Texas -- A 15-year-old San Marcos girl and her father have filed a federal lawsuit against her school nurse, who allegedly forced the girl to take a pregnancy test.
The lawsuit claims that nurse Dyanna Eastwood called the girl to her office and told her that a student at another school claimed he impregnated her. Eastwood insisted the girl take the test, according to the lawsuit.
The girl said she did not have sex with the boy and denied that she was pregnant. The girl's lawyer also said she was not pregnant. The suit, which was filed Wednesday in U.S. District Court in Austin, claims the girl's privacy and constitutional rights were violated during the January event.
The lawsuit, which seeks unspecified damages, claims Eastwood violated the girl's Fourth Amendment right against unreasonable search and seizure.
"I remember the incident," Eastwood said. "Is that how it went down? No, of course not."
She declined to comment further, saying she wanted to seek legal advice.
The lawsuit also names the San Marcos Consolidated Independent School District as a defendant. The district's general counsel, Juan Cruz, declined to comment, saying officials have not been served with the lawsuit.
"This whole thing is intrinsically wrong," said John Hindera, the family's Austin lawyer. "She's a 15-year-old girl that's suddenly being confronted with having sex and being pregnant."
Hindera said that Eastwood did not threaten any consequences if the girl declined to take the test, but that the girl felt she had no choice because the nurse is an authority figure.
When the girl's father asked Principal Chad Kelly about the pregnancy test, the father was handed a piece of paper citing a section of the Texas Family Code stating that a child may consent to medical treatment by a licensed physician if the child "is unmarried and pregnant and consents to hospital, medical or surgical treatment, other than abortion, related to the pregnancy."
Hindera said even if the girl agreed to take the test, that consent isn't valid under Texas law because of her age.
"As I explained before.......read my lips.........you cannot have As I explained before.......read my lips.........you cannot have statutory rape between two juveniles!"
So there are no open court cases in the US regarding statutory rape between two juveniles?
It is time to close state sponsored, leftist NEA run schools. Get the leftists out of brainwashing our children/grandchildren. Immediately eliminate all taxes that support schools. If school districts are mortgaged with bond issues, make the NEA responsible for meeting that debt.
Even the 'good' schools have more 'bad' than 'good'.
I substitute teach, and I'm around kids in that age group. I'd bet cash money that he was bragging about having sex (whether he did or not) and trashing a girl's reputation for the sheer joy of it.
The immaturity level of children is why the kids act that way, and why it's an outrage that they can decide their own medical treatment, as long as it's about sex.
I messed up quoting you on that last post and I apologize for it.
I will tell you this one thing. There is no one on this planet, nurse or otherwise, who would have been entitled to administer a pregnancy test to my minor daughter. The issue of my daughter's possible pregnancy is MY business and HERS. I don't need a school to handle my family business for me. So, I'm ticked at this nurse. She could have handled the situation differently-- there's always more than one way to skin a cat.
If she has the baby, the school might be out some state funding during her pregnancy absence, plus she will be more likely to drop out to care for the baby. Follow the money. The school has a financial interest in making sure that pregnant students have abortions
I am confused. You are part of the system and as such you know the rules. You explain that the nurse's actions may have been mandated, or at least encouraged, under the circumstances. Then you say that under similar circumstances you would have blasted the nurse for doing what she did. What did I miss?
And you would then join the let's-all-go-to-court crowd. Unless I am missing something you seem to have become infected with the liberal virus and would take actions which only make the situation worse by making the system more rigid in its requirements.
<<"When the girl's father asked Principal Chad Kelly about the pregnancy test, the father was handed a piece of paper citing a section of the Texas Family Code stating that a child may consent to medical treatment by a licensed physician if the child "is unmarried and pregnant and consents to hospital, medical or surgical treatment, other than abortion, related to the pregnancy." >>
Well, that's a real interesting read there Mr. Principal, but it has no bearing on why your nurse forced a girl to take a pregnancy test!!
That was a reasoned response and I'll respond later today. Thank you.
Well, I wondered what was the inspiration for placing the mural in Germantown. It certainly had nothing to do with the students in that community.
"...I agree with everyone else here who thinks this is systemic..."
It is systemic. This principal is an @$$hole, defending the system that he represents. He is absolutely responsible for the nurse's actions. They should both do time for violating this girl's rights.
Note also that he used a piece of paper about "Texas Family Code stating that a child may consent to medical treatment by a licensed physician..."
SINCE WHEN IS A NURSE A 'LICENSED PHYSICIAN'?
On top of everything else, the nurse should be charged in this case with 'practicing medicine w/o a license'.
First, we don't know that is what happened. You are surmising from your own frame of reference. Secondly, why is it traumatic and invoking of feelings of shame, especially if you know you are innocent? That seems a reaction based on self-respect or lack thereof. Being female has nothing to do with it other than the pregnancy part. What if it had been a drug test because someone had said she was a drug user?
Many people would have viewed the situation as an opportunity to prove themselves above all that, if they were. The reaction could have easily been one of confidence and satisfaction rather than one of trauma and shame, both indicative of guilt.
I wonder who supplied the pregnancy test? Is that standard issue these days in school infirmaries?
To be fair in our analysis, we need to remember that linguistic patterns are commonly adapted to fit the language and speech patterns around an individual. Heck - my 14 year old son even has me saying "Dude" from time to time!
I grew up watching Bill and Ted, "dude" is unconscious at times... ;)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.