Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Is Durbin's speech ABSOLUTELY privileged or conditionally: Congressman Billybob?

Posted on 06/16/2005 8:14:57 PM PDT by disraeligears

Can Durbin be sued for his comments. Assume:

a) comments were slanderous per se

b) Durbin knew of their falsity and made them for simple political gain

c) the potential damage to the slandered party, the American soldier, is not just defamation, but increased likelihood of death on the battlefield.

Would a court view this not as protected political speech on the Senate floor, but, given the circumstances, reduce his privilege from one that is absolute to that of a conditional privilege.

Is his privilege absolute or conditional


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 06/16/2005 8:14:58 PM PDT by disraeligears
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: disraeligears

R E P R E H E N S I B L E


2 posted on 06/16/2005 8:16:52 PM PDT by NutCrackerBoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: disraeligears
Whatever is spoken on the floor of the House or Senate is absolutely privileged under the Speech and Debate Clause. This has long since been tested and established in the US SCt. And in this instance, the Court ruling matches the language of the Constitution.

Hoever, if Durbin is dumb enough to repeat such comments outside the Senate, or if staff members repeat these comments on his/her own rather than as a staffer, then and only then privilege may not apply.

Congressman Billybob

Latest column: "Gitmo In, GitmoOut?"

3 posted on 06/16/2005 8:22:21 PM PDT by Congressman Billybob (For copies of my speech, "Dealing with Outlaw Judges," please Freepmail me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NutCrackerBoy

bump to your comment


4 posted on 06/16/2005 9:03:02 PM PDT by MikefromOhio (WELCOME TO THE 10000 THREAD!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Congressman Billybob

Too bad Dueling is illegal....

But then again, Bin Turban Durbin would be too cowardly to accept the challenge....

Semper Fi


5 posted on 06/16/2005 10:24:43 PM PDT by river rat (You may turn the other cheek, but I prefer to look into my enemy's vacant dead eyes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: disraeligears

Putting aside the issue of privilege, in order for Durbin's remarks to be actionable as slander, they would have to be directed toward an individual -- either someone mentioned by name or described in such a particular way that a reasonable person could identify the individual. Accusing "soldiers" of running a gulag probably wouldn't meet the standard.


6 posted on 06/17/2005 7:05:12 AM PDT by blau993 (Labs for love; .357 for Security.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson