Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

`Batman Begins' terffic superhero movie
xinhuanet.com ^ | 2005-06-16 09:38:13 | Agencies

Posted on 06/15/2005 7:56:12 PM PDT by Destro

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-59 last
Comment #41 Removed by Moderator

To: Baynative

No big deal. To each their own. Some people like Harry Potter and I can't stand the character. If you are or have been a fan of comix, then you know what works and what does not. I thought the first two Batman movies made years ago were good. There was some camp in it but it attempted to stick to the darkness of the Batman character. The last two were more like the old television program or the Batman of the 50's and 60's.


42 posted on 06/20/2005 8:42:45 AM PDT by 7thson (I think it takes a big dog to weigh a hundred pounds!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Starter

If it took you that long to recognize Rutger Hauer from this movie, you probably still haven't recognized him from Sin City. :)

This movie is amazing though. Perfectly realized on every level.


43 posted on 06/20/2005 8:49:42 AM PDT by Mr. Blonde (You know, Happy Time Harry, just being around you kinda makes me want to die.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Names Ash Housewares

I thought the first 2/3 or so was a really terrific movie.

Then it seemed to fall apart right around when the big bad's plot was being carried out. It just went on and on, and seemed to have lost its way.

(SPOILER WARNING)

Example: he has this awesome car, he drives like a madman -- and there's always the same cop car two car-lengths behind him. You don't get the feeling that he's accomplishing anything, that he's doing anything. He can't shake them for love nor money. Then, suddenly, he's in the bat cave, and they have no idea where he is.

And Rachel -- Bruce is worthless because he's a playboy bad boy who doesn't actually DO anything that matters; but then she doesn't want to be involved with him... because he's a serious guy who's DOING something that matters.

Huh?

I still like it, but where I'd give the preceding movie maybe 4 or 4.5 stars, I'd give the end maybe 2.5.

Dan


44 posted on 06/20/2005 1:12:09 PM PDT by BibChr ("...behold, they have rejected the word of the LORD, so what wisdom is in them?" [Jer. 8:9])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: 7thson
I liked Bale in "American Psycho" too. He was a great Batman.
45 posted on 06/20/2005 1:40:57 PM PDT by Sybeck1 (chance is the “magic wand to make not only rabbits but entire universes appear out of nothing.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: 7thson

After the first Batman movie (the one by Tim Burton) I was hoping for a Ra's Shal Ghul appearance. Though I believe that Ra's is an arab and lives in the desert.
Hugo Strange would be pretty cool though it looks like the Joker is going to make an apperance in the next film (The guy from Back to the Future and Willard is going to play the Joker. Not a bad choice)

Now if they could just get Man-Bat.

The Mob Boss got taken down to easily after alot of build up. Though I guess he was just a puppet anyway.


46 posted on 06/20/2005 2:23:10 PM PDT by escapefromboston (manny ortez: mvp)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Destro

Batman is actually the owner of the city. The old homestead. Private property, tenants pay rent and bad guys get tossed out.


47 posted on 06/20/2005 2:26:30 PM PDT by RightWhale (withdraw from the 1967 UN Outer Space Treaty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
There is something in viewing Batman - old blue blood family - viewing Gotham as his feudal estate and the people as his serfs - he is after all the "Dark Knight" - though Batman does not take a percentage of their labor as compensation nor does he get first crack at the virgin brides (beyond his playboy image).
48 posted on 06/20/2005 8:57:44 PM PDT by Destro (Know your enemy! Help fight Islamic terrorism by visiting johnathangaltfilms.com and jihadwatch.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Destro

Yes, that's exactly what he thinks; the whole "Sir Gawain and the Green Knight" concept reinforces Bruce's stewardship of the city along with inheriting the legacy from his father.


49 posted on 06/21/2005 6:42:56 PM PDT by Hawkeye's Girl (Bats are nocturnal!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Baynative
Take a look at this one. You'll be pretty surprised. It's not campy like the 60's nor homoerotic like the nipple suited Clooney crapfest. It's a straight-up good film *first* made with a very capable cast of nearly all Brits plus Morgan Freeman.

Not a foul word to be found that I noted, a couple of good moments about the failings of socialism to solve societal ills and plenty of 70's blockbuster-type action without the teeth-grinding computer graphics.

It's a good movie first and half of it is non-Batman.

50 posted on 06/21/2005 11:17:34 PM PDT by newzjunkey (Remind Liberal Cowards Why America Freed Iraq: http://massgraves.info/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Darkwolf377
Both X-Men movies were kind of lifeless, and the gay subtext is just silly.

What gay subtext?

51 posted on 06/21/2005 11:22:12 PM PDT by MitchellC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: MitchellC
What gay subtext?

In the second movie, when Iceman tells his parents he's a mutant, and his mom says "Can't you just not be a mutant?", the direct parallel is a gay/lesbian son or daughter coming out to their parents and getting rejected. This was mentioned in all the hype leading up to the movie.

Now, you don't have to view the scene that way, but that is how it was intended.

52 posted on 06/22/2005 11:10:43 AM PDT by Hawkeye's Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: spetznaz; eastsider; discostu; Starter; gate2wire; brwnsuga; TattooedUSAFConservative; ...
Today I saw Batman Begins. I thought it was terrific, better than the 1989 Batman, which itself was pretty good.

This one captures the "Dark Knight" feel very well. Gotham City is corrupt, dark, and dangerous. The Batmobile is fantastic!

The lead, Christian Bale, is a good choice for Bruce Wayne/Batman--he has the look, the voice, etc. Also well-cast are Michael Caine as Alfred (he's especially good), Gary Oldman as Gordon, Morgan Freeman as sort of a counterpart to 007's gadget guru, and Liam Neeson as Wayne's mentor. Katie Holmes as the love interest/Asst. DA is OK--not great, but OK. There are a few other key characters--a crime boss, a crooked cop, a spooky court psychiatrist.

Kept my interest throughout, very entertaining.

53 posted on 06/23/2005 8:03:23 PM PDT by Charles Henrickson (Awaiting the next entry in the series.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Charles Henrickson

bump


54 posted on 06/23/2005 8:39:38 PM PDT by bigsigh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Charles Henrickson

Gary Oldham is probably the best actor going today, but he is in this cast among many great ones. It is amazing to me how well he just becomes whoever he is playing.


55 posted on 06/24/2005 12:30:00 AM PDT by Mr. Blonde (You know, Happy Time Harry, just being around you kinda makes me want to die.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Starter
"I didn't recognize Rutger Hauer until about an hour an a half after I finished watching the film. (I think I thought he was Jon Voight.)"

That, actually, should be considered a compliment! A great actor is one that makes you forget who the actor is, because you are so focused on the CHARACTER.

You know the actor stinks when you don't remember the character's name, only the actor's name.

56 posted on 06/24/2005 12:51:08 AM PDT by TheWriterTX (Proud Retrosexual Wife of 12 Years)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Baynative
My wife reminded me that my own sister and her husband just spent a whole weekend going to Denver to see ABBA.

ABBA doesn't perform anymore. If they did, I'd go see them too.

57 posted on 06/24/2005 7:42:16 PM PDT by Dr. Scarpetta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

Comment #58 Removed by Moderator

To: Mr. Blonde

Agreed, Oldman is probably one of the most brilliant actors on the scene today.


59 posted on 06/30/2005 7:38:15 AM PDT by Romish_Papist (The times are out of step with the Catholic Church. God Bless Pope Benedict XVI.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-59 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson