Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Time releases list of 100 all-time great movies (Gone with the wind fails the test)
Time ^ | 11 june 2005 | Richard Corliss

Posted on 06/11/2005 8:50:34 AM PDT by voletti

The All-TIME 100 Movies feature—compiled by Richard Schickel and me, and handsomely packaged by Josh Macht, Mark Coatney and all the smart folks at TIME.com—attracted a record-busting 7.8 million page views in its first week, including 3.5 million on May 23rd, its opening day. Thousands of readers have written in to cheer or challenge our selections, and thousands more have voted for their own favorites. The response simply underscores Richard's and my long-held belief that everybody has two jobs: his own and movie critic.

The idea was to assemble 100 estimable films since TIME began, with the March 3, 1923 issue. Later, each of us was asked to contribute five items in sidebars called Great Performances (acting), Guilty Pleasures (trash treasures) and Top Scores (soundtracks). Essentially, though, a century of movies from 82 years. That shouldn't be hard: pick a picture for each year, with 18 slots left for honorable mentions.

Not so simple, in fact, for we faced a couple of complications. The first was that two of us were to agree on the selections; and, though my admiration for Schickel is hardly bounded, and he probably doesn't mind me, no two critics will agree on all, or even most, great films. The other is the onus of the list-making process. It's a truism that a list like this takes either an hour (go with your initial inspirations) or a month (weigh every film with Solomonic probity). Our effort clocked in at about four months, off and on. And the clock is still running.

(Excerpt) Read more at time.com ...


TOPICS: TV/Movies
KEYWORDS: cinemaparadiso; timemag; topten
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-90 next last
To: voletti
What's worse than these lists are people hating the lists because they don't match their personal tastes. Well, that's kinda the point, it's THEIR list.

I don't know about you, but if I made a list like this, I'd change it once a month, keeping maybe 80% of the titles each time; in a few years of doing that, I'd probably have it down to a solid Top 300.

41 posted on 06/11/2005 2:30:52 PM PDT by Darkwolf377 (Dems, the annoying vegetarians of politics)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Darkwolf377; Dashing Dasher; Cacique

http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/6305648522/qid=1118539684/sr=1-2/ref=sr_1_2/102-2413740-8674505?v=glance&s=dvd


42 posted on 06/11/2005 6:29:35 PM PDT by Do not dub me shapka broham ("What in the world happened to Gerard's tag-line?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: mmercier

"Still trying to get an original copy of the book.:

But do Androids dream of electric sheep?


43 posted on 06/11/2005 6:35:05 PM PDT by investigateworld ( God bless Poland for giving the world JP II & a Protestant bump for his Sainthood!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: voletti

"Berlin Alexanderplatz"?: Name one critic who has sat through this 13 hour film! I don't know of any. Outside of The Z Channel, it's never been on televison in its entirety.

"Bonnie & Clyde"?: You've got to be kidding!

"Barry Lyndon"?: A pretty film, but shouldn't be on the list.

"The Fly"?: Why not "The Dead Zone"?

"The Singing Detective"?: Why not "The Long Good Friday" or the original "Get Carter"?

Dumb list.

Jack.


44 posted on 06/11/2005 6:51:25 PM PDT by Jack Deth (Knight Errant and Disemboweler of the WFTD Thread)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Do not dub me shapka broham

ick...


45 posted on 06/11/2005 6:55:49 PM PDT by Darkwolf377 (Dems, the annoying vegetarians of politics)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: voletti

Well, I'd put Gone With The Wind and Blazing Saddles as the top two movies of ALL time!*~*


46 posted on 06/11/2005 6:56:32 PM PDT by Dawgreg (Happiness is not having what you want, but wanting what you have.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shotokan

Funny you should say that shotokan. I turned it on the other night to see what it was about and after hearing God's name in vain no less than what seemed to be 100 times in the first five minutes OFF it went.


47 posted on 06/11/2005 6:58:18 PM PDT by Dawgreg (Happiness is not having what you want, but wanting what you have.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: the Deejay

I guess you have to be a hopeless romantic like myself to love that movie, Deejay......hehehehehe.


48 posted on 06/11/2005 6:59:14 PM PDT by Dawgreg (Happiness is not having what you want, but wanting what you have.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: investigateworld

>>> But do Androids dream of electric sheep?

Say what...?


I want an original copy of the book, I read and collect.
Been waiting a year for a callback from several used book dealers.


49 posted on 06/11/2005 7:10:27 PM PDT by mmercier (sharing the couch of a god)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: voletti
No "Sergent York"..?

Did I miss "2001, A space odyssey" onthe list..?

Those bastards.
50 posted on 06/11/2005 7:20:01 PM PDT by mmercier (sharing the couch of a god)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mmercier
The movie "Bladerunner" was based on Philip K. Dick's book "Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep".

And any list that left out Blazing Saddles, Road Warrior, and all the John Wayne oater's; well what can be said :(
51 posted on 06/11/2005 7:41:34 PM PDT by investigateworld ( God bless Poland for giving the world JP II & a Protestant bump for his Sainthood!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: RobFromGa
The Apu Trilogy (1955, 1956, 1959)

"Thank You, Come again"


52 posted on 06/11/2005 8:16:21 PM PDT by hattend (Alaska....in a time warp all it's own!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: RobFromGa

Oh come on, "The Fly" over "Gone With The Wind".

This list is a joke.


53 posted on 06/11/2005 8:18:47 PM PDT by A CA Guy (God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: mmercier; Dawgreg
There are several Mel Brooks films that should have made the cut.

I'm also surprised that a film directed by Sergei Eisenstein didn't merit even an honorable mention.

54 posted on 06/11/2005 10:48:16 PM PDT by Do not dub me shapka broham ("What in the world happened to Gerard's tag-line?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: voletti

Pulp Fiction????
They can't be serious.
The movie is actually painful to watch. I can think of about a hundred better movies than that to put on the list.


And where, may I ask, is Ghostbusters II,Rocky IV, and Bill and Ted's Excellent Adventure? :)


55 posted on 06/12/2005 12:26:11 AM PDT by frankiep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dts32041

No John Wayne? No Robert Taylor? No Cary Grant?

No credibility.


56 posted on 06/12/2005 12:29:08 AM PDT by bannie (The government which robs Peter to pay Paul can always depend upon the support of Paul.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: mmercier

I used to live and read books in accordance with the belief that the book upon which a movie was based would be even better. But Blade Runner/Do Androids Dream... and The Natural were extremely disappointing exceptions to that rule.


57 posted on 06/12/2005 5:54:25 AM PDT by McGarrett (Book'em Danno)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: voletti
WHAT no, She wore a Yellow Ribbon. ???
58 posted on 06/12/2005 5:56:08 AM PDT by mware ("God is dead" -- Nietzsche........ "Nope, you are"-- GOD)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: A CA Guy
I can just about guarantee why "Gone With The Wind", was left off.

It's positive depiction of the South.

59 posted on 06/12/2005 6:37:27 AM PDT by yarddog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Do not dub me shapka broham

Sorry, I've never heard of Sergei Eisenstein......now Mel Brooks yes! The sillier and more outrageous a film is, the better I like it. I know I may have a defect.......*~*.


60 posted on 06/12/2005 6:59:47 AM PDT by Dawgreg (Happiness is not having what you want, but wanting what you have.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-90 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson