Coming in out of the cold: Cold fusion, for real ~~ UCLA Lab experiment ~~

The Christian Science Monitor ^ | June 06, 2005 | Michelle Thaller | csmonitor.com

[Ernest_at_the_Beach]

PASADENA, CALIF. - For the last few years, mentioning cold fusion around scientists (myself included) has been a little like mentioning Bigfoot or UFO sightings.

After the 1989 announcement of fusion in a bottle, so to speak, and the subsequent retraction, the whole idea of cold fusion seemed a bit beyond the pale. But that's all about to change.

A very reputable, very careful group of scientists at the University of Los Angeles (Brian Naranjo, Jim Gimzewski, Seth Putterman) has initiated a fusion reaction using a laboratory device that's not much bigger than a breadbox, and works at roughly room temperature. This time, it looks like the real thing.

Before going into their specific experiment, it's probably a good idea to define exactly what nuclear fusion is, and why we're so interested in understanding the process. This also gives me an excuse to talk about how things work deep inside the nuclei of atoms, a topic near and dear to most astronomers (more on that later).

Simply put, nuclear fusion means ramming protons and neutrons together so hard that they stick, and form a single, larger nucleus. When this happens with small nuclei (like hydrogen, which has only one proton or helium, which has two), you get a lot of energy out of the reaction. This specific reaction, fusing two hydrogen nuclei together to get helium, famously powers our sun (good), as well as hydrogen bombs (bad).

Fusion is a tremendous source of energy; the reason we're not using it to meet our everyday energy needs is that it's very hard to get a fusion reaction going. The reason is simple: protons don't want to get close to other protons.

Do you remember learning about electricity in high school? I sure do - I dreaded it whenever that topic came around. I had a series of well-meaning science teachers that thought it would be fun for everyone to hold hands and feel a mild electric shock pass their arms. Every time my fists clenched and jerked and I had nothing consciously do with it, my stomach turned.

In addition, I have long, fine hair, and was often made a victim of the Van de Graf generator - the little metal ball with a rubber belt inside it that creates enough static electricity to make your hair stand on end. Yeesh.

Anyway, hopefully you remember the lesson that two objects having different electrical charges (positive and negative) attract one another, while those with the same charge repel. It's a basic law of electricity, and it definitely holds true when two protons try to get close together. Protons have positive charges, and they repel each other. Somehow, in order for fusion to work, you've got to overcome this repulsive electrical force and get the things to stick together.

Here's where an amazing and mysterious force comes in that, although we don't think about it in our day-to-day lives, literally holds our matter together. There are four universal forces of nature, two of which you're probably familiar with: gravity and electromagnetism.

But there are two other forces that really only come in to play inside atomic nuclei: the strong and weak nuclear forces (and yes, the strong force is the stronger of the two, the weak is weaker. Scientists really have a way with names, dont they?) I'm going to focus on the strong force, as that's the one responsible for nuclear fusion.

The strong force is an attractive force between protons and neutrons - it wants to stick them together. If the strong force had its way, the entire universe would be one big super-dense ball of protons and neutrons, one big atomic nucleus, in fact.

Fortunately, the strong force only becomes strong at very small scales: about one millionth billionth of a meter. Yes, that's 0.000000000000001 meters. Any farther away, and the strong force loses its grip. But if you can get protons and neutrons that close together, the strong force becomes stronger than any other force in nature, including electricity.

That's important- all protons have the same charge, so they'd like to fly away from each other. But if you can get them close together, inside the volume of an atomic nucleus, the strong force will bind them together.

The whole trick with fusion is you've got to get protons close enough together for the strong force to overcome their electrical repulsion and merge them together into a nucleus. The sun does this pretty much by brute force. The sun has over 300,000 times the mass of the Earth, which means there's a lot of gravity weighing down on its core.

That pressure gets the sun's internal temperature up to several millions of degrees, which means that particles inside the sun's core are flying around at huge velocities. Everything is moving around so fast that protons sometimes get slammed together before their charges have a chance to repel. The strong force takes hold, and a new atom (helium) is born.

In this process, some of the mass of the protons is converted into energy, powering the sun and producing the light that will eventually reach the Earth as sunlight.

Scientists have gotten fusion to occur in the laboratory before, but for the most part, they've tried to mimic conditions inside the sun by whipping hydrogen gas up to extreme temperatures or slamming atoms together in particle accelerators. Both of those options require huge energies and gigantic equipment, not the sort of stuff easily available to build a generator. Is there any way of getting protons close enough together for fusion to occur that doesnt require the energy output of a large city to make it happen?

The answer, it turns out, is yes.

Instead of using high temperatures and incredible densities to ram protons together, the scientists at UCLA cleverly used the structure of an unusual crystal.

Crystals are fascinating things; the atoms inside are all lined up in a tightly ordered lattice, which creates the beautiful structure we associate with crystals. Sometimes those orderly atoms create neat side-effects, like piezoelectricity, which is the effect of creating an electrical charge in a crystal by compressing it. Stressing the bonds between the atoms of some crystals causes electrons to build up on one side, creating a charge difference over the body of the crystal. Other crystals do this when you heat or cool them; these are called pyroelectric crystals.

The new cold fusion experiment went something like this: scientists inserted a small pyroelectric crystal (lithium tantalite) inside a chamber filled with hydrogen. Warming the crystal by about 100 degrees (from -30 F to 45F) produced a huge electrical field of about 100,000 volts across the small crystal.

The tip of a metal wire was inserted near the crystal, which concentrated the charge to a single, powerful point. Remember, hydrogen nuclei have a positive charge, so they feel the force of an electric field, and this one packed quite a wallop! The huge electric field sent the nuclei careening away, smacking into other hydrogen nuclei on their way out. Instead of using intense heat or pressure to get nuclei close enough together to fuse, this new experiment used a very powerful electric field to slam atoms together.

Unlike some previous claims of room-temperature fusion, this one makes intuitive sense: its just another way to get atoms close enough together for the strong force to take over and do the rest. Once the reaction got going, the scientists observed not only the production of helium nuclei, but other tell-tale signs of fusion such as free neutrons and high energy radiation.

This experiment has been repeated successfully and other scientists have reviewed the results: it looks like the real thing this time.

For the time being, don't expect fusion to become a readily available energy option. The current cold fusion apparatus still takes much more energy to start up than you get back out, and it may never end up breaking even. In the mean time, the crystal-fusion device might be used as a compact source of neutrons and X-rays, something that could turn out to be useful making small scanning machines. But it really may not be long until we have the first nuclear fusion-powered devices in common use.

So cold fusion is back, perhaps to stay. After many fits and starts, its finally time for everyday fusion to come in out of the cold.

Full HTML version of this story which may include photos, graphics, and related links

[La Enchiladita]

There used to be a nuclear reactor on campus. For real.

[beezdotcom]

There used to be a nuclear reactor on campus. For real.

Yeah, MIT has one, too...right on Mass Ave.

[r9etb]

Sheesh, what an irritating article. Just tell us the info, rather than all of those silly expostulations.

In the interest of science, here is Dr. Thaller:

Not too bad.... But if she talks like she writes, I think I'd prolly be turning to thoughts of homicide in relatively short order.

[Blzbba]

"There used to be a nuclear reactor on campus. For real."


Ga Tech used to have a breeder reactor for their Nuclear Engineering program. I think it's still online, but I haven't been back to campus since 1993...

[RightWhale]

Pretty good article.

I have noticed that several of the science-for-the-layman books I have read lately were written by women. This is a change, the invasion of a male-dominated field, and I think, for the better.

[Bloody Sam Roberts]

This is seriesly hugh news.

Two words:
Dilitium crystals.

Was Roddenberry an alien?

[Bloody Sam Roberts]

Make that...Dilithium crystals

[Blue Champagne]

I was employed at a research lab when the first news of cold fusion was announced, and there was a great deal of debate among the Ph.D. types as to whether it was feasible. It will be interesting to see if it actually pans out.

[hattend]

Do you remember learning about electricity in high school?

I learned about it in grade school. But then I didn't go to a public school until High School.

[hattend]

This experiment has been repeated successfully and other scientists have reviewed the results: it looks like the real thing this time.

I can't wait to tell the Saudis to drink their oil.

[mc5cents]

I can't wait to tell the Saudis to drink their oil.

I think the following quote from the piece probably means that it won't be anytime soon.

For the time being, don't expect fusion to become a readily available energy option. The current cold fusion apparatus still takes much more energy to start up than you get back out, and it may never end up breaking even.

[hattend]

Yeah but cold fusion was impossible 30 years ago and is only economically impossible now.

Give the research another 15-20 years.

[SunkenCiv]

thanks Ernest.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/keyword?k=fission
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/keyword?k=coldfusion
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/keyword?k=fusion

[Ernest_at_the_Beach]

Thanks!

[hork]

IEEE Spectrum recently had an article about using sound waves to help cause fusion (sonofusion), also at or near room temperature.

"By applying sound waves to a deuterium-rich liquid, we create pressure oscillations that implode tiny bubbles filled with deuterium vapor. The bubbles' violent collapse can cause some of the deuterium nuclei to undergo fusion."

Here's hoping one of these eventually scales enough to make a significant energy contribution - but let's build more fission capacity now!

[lasisra]

Other scientists have recently reproduced the results of the original experiments by Drs. Pons and Fleischmann in the 1980s.

Here's a link to a paper by a Dr. R. A. Oriani and Dr. J.C. Fisher dated December 2004 on this subject:

http://www.lenr-canr.org/acrobat/OrianiRAnuclearrea.pdf

In this paper, they describe an apparatus that seems very similar to the original Pons/Fleischmann apparatus: a linear electrolysis cell (basically a glass tube with fancy wiring) using a platinum anode and either a platinum or palladium cathode. Reactions occurred at a temperature of 60C.

They detected high-energy particles that they state must have come from a nuclear reaction (their energy was too high for them to have originated from a chemical reaction). They do not assert that "fusion" occurred, but instead state that existing nuclear theory does not describe a type of reaction that explains these results.

I've seen this reaction referred to in other places as the "Oriani effect".

So, it appears as though Pons and Fleischmann may have been on to something after all. But they chose to go public about "cold fusion" before they understood the mechanism behind their results. Since they didn't understand it, they couldn't defend it (and the scientific community gleefully eviscerated their work and reputations). Also, they could not explain why other scientists' attempts to replicate their work often failed.

As you said, hopefully one of these technologies will eventually become an economical source of energy.

I agree with your other comment about increasing fission capacity now - but I also think that biopower ("Anything into Oil") and distributed generation technology need to be aggressively developed. The more varied our sources of power are, the less vulnerable we will be to crippling blackouts.