Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Lawmakers object to fake penis for drug tests
Yahoo! News | Reuters ^ | 5/11/05

Posted on 05/11/2005 3:12:12 PM PDT by LibWhacker

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A life-like prosthetic penis called the Whizzinator and other products promising to help illegal drug users pass urine tests provoked U.S. lawmakers on Wednesday to take legal action with subpoenas of manufacturers.

Lawmakers objected to attempts to circumvent drug tests with products such as The Whizzinator, a fake penis that can provide a flow of clean urine "again and again, anytime, anywhere you need it!" according to the Web site www.whizzinator.com.

A congressional subcommittee voted to subpoena the owner of Puck Technology of Signal Hill, California, the company that makes the Whizzinator. The panel also voted to subpoena the owners of Health Choice of New York City and Spectrum Labs of Cincinnati, two companies that lawmakers said also were suspected of selling products aimed at circumventing workplace drug tests.

The owners were required to provide financial and operational records by Monday and to appear at a congressional hearing on Tuesday.

"These companies seek through deception to make a buck by violating our trust and compromising our security," said Rep. Ed Whitfield, a Kentucky Republican who chairs the House Energy and Commerce Committee's oversight and investigations panel.

"It is a risk we simply cannot tolerate. This panel will uncover how widespread these products are and recommend the necessary steps to end their use," Whitfield said in a statement.

Actor Tom Sizemore, who played a sergeant in the war movie "Saving Private Ryan," was caught using the Whizzinator to try and pass drug tests, California prosecutors said in February. He was put in jail after using a similar device and failing a drug test, prosecutors said.

DRINKS TO FLUSH DRUGS

The House committee is investigating whether federal legislation is needed to stop companies from making similar products, such as drinks that promise to flush out drug ingredients in urine.

The company officials had previously declined to testify and provided little information, a committee statement said.

Michael Fichera, owner of Health Choice, said he had told the committee he would cooperate with the investigation.

"I don't think there's anything wrong with the products we're selling," Fichera said in an interview. "We do a service. I think it's way more positive than negative."

He said users of his company's products, which include drinks and capsules, must be "clean" for two to three days before using them to pass a drug test.

"We're not beating or cheating on drug tests. We are just accelerating the cleansing time," Fichera said.

An official at Spectrum Labs did not immediately respond to a request for comment about the congressional action. A man who answered the phone at Puck Technology said no one was available to comment.


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: drug; fake; lawmakers; object; prosthetic; tests; urine; whizzinator; wodlist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

1 posted on 05/11/2005 3:12:14 PM PDT by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
Lawmakers object to fake penis for drug tests

They hate the way it tastes.

2 posted on 05/11/2005 3:13:30 PM PDT by dead (I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

More war on drugs nonsense.


3 posted on 05/11/2005 3:14:25 PM PDT by rhombus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dead

If there's anybody who knows dick, its Congress.


4 posted on 05/11/2005 3:14:33 PM PDT by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
Lawmakers object to fake penis for drug tests

Ya think? I guess the first clue was the sound of plastic hitting the glass. Or the ice cold... Hmmmmmmm...............

5 posted on 05/11/2005 3:14:45 PM PDT by Jaded (Hell sometimes has flourescent lighting and a trumpet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

"A life-like prosthetic penis called the Whizzinator..."

What an opening line, LoL


6 posted on 05/11/2005 3:15:07 PM PDT by nuconvert (No More Axis of Evil by Christmas ! TLR) [there's a lot of bad people in the pistachio business])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
The owners were required to provide financial and operational records by Monday and to appear at a congressional hearing on Tuesday.

I bet the media is all over this one. Pixelated footage anyone?

7 posted on 05/11/2005 3:15:23 PM PDT by konaice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wolfie

I understand Barney Frank subpoenaed 25 of them for investigatory purposes.


8 posted on 05/11/2005 3:16:23 PM PDT by MeanWestTexan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

Of course, this is all from that august body that wouldn't dream of passing legislation requiring drug testing of its members.


9 posted on 05/11/2005 3:16:58 PM PDT by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

I'll hold my opinion until Barney Frank weighs in.


10 posted on 05/11/2005 3:17:15 PM PDT by auboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MeanWestTexan

You spelled it wrong. Its "sub-peenie".


11 posted on 05/11/2005 3:17:53 PM PDT by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

Drug tests are unconstitutional - they violate the Fourth Amendment, and I don't care what the Supremos have to say about it either. I can read as well as they can.


12 posted on 05/11/2005 3:18:00 PM PDT by microgood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

Most people use these products because of weed. I dont know why, they dont work and never will. The only way to remove THC from positive testing levels is to burn fat. The people using these products are getting a double whammy-losing their money and their jobs..


13 posted on 05/11/2005 3:19:09 PM PDT by cardinal4 (Newly Discovered breed of Cephalopod - Billius Fristus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: microgood
Drug tests are unconstitutional.

Wrong. The Supremes, however, did strike down drug testing in one, count 'em, one case - when it was to be applied to judges and legislators. Go figure.

14 posted on 05/11/2005 3:20:04 PM PDT by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

Remember: If fake urinating penises are outlawed, only outlaws will have fake urinating penises.


15 posted on 05/11/2005 3:20:16 PM PDT by Celtjew Libertarian (Shake Hands with the Serpent: Poetry by Charles Lipsig aka Celtjew http://books.lulu.com/lipsig)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cardinal4
Most people use these products because of weed. I dont know why, they dont work and never will. The only way to remove THC from positive testing levels is to burn fat.

Shh.... Don't tell Rep. Whitfield... He'll start looking for ways to ban treadmills and exercise bikes.

16 posted on 05/11/2005 3:21:43 PM PDT by Celtjew Libertarian (Shake Hands with the Serpent: Poetry by Charles Lipsig aka Celtjew http://books.lulu.com/lipsig)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Wolfie

LOL!

Next article:

Voters object to fake balls on Lawmakers.


17 posted on 05/11/2005 3:24:04 PM PDT by JesseJane (Close the Borders.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Wolfie
Wrong.

I was posting what was actually the case, not what has been ruled on by SCOTUS. We Americans are the ultimate arbitrators as to what is constitutional, not the judges,IMHO.

when it was to be applied to judges and legislators. Go figure.

Scum is too nice a word for them.
18 posted on 05/11/2005 3:24:08 PM PDT by microgood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Celtjew Libertarian

From a related article, the fake penis comes with de-hyrated urine (just add water!).

So it would work.


19 posted on 05/11/2005 3:29:30 PM PDT by MeanWestTexan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: microgood
We Americans are the ultimate arbitrators as to what is constitutional, not the judges,IMHO.

Oh, I completely agree. Frankly, I think our Founding Citizens were suckers to fall for the Constitution, the meaning of which could be changed at any time by 5 out of 9 lifetime political appointees.

20 posted on 05/11/2005 3:34:04 PM PDT by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson