Skip to comments.
Lawmakers object to fake penis for drug tests
Yahoo! News | Reuters ^
| 5/11/05
Posted on 05/11/2005 3:12:12 PM PDT by LibWhacker
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
To: LibWhacker
Lawmakers object to fake penis for drug testsThey hate the way it tastes.
2
posted on
05/11/2005 3:13:30 PM PDT
by
dead
(I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
To: LibWhacker
More war on drugs nonsense.
3
posted on
05/11/2005 3:14:25 PM PDT
by
rhombus
To: dead
If there's anybody who knows dick, its Congress.
4
posted on
05/11/2005 3:14:33 PM PDT
by
Wolfie
To: LibWhacker
Lawmakers object to fake penis for drug testsYa think? I guess the first clue was the sound of plastic hitting the glass. Or the ice cold... Hmmmmmmm...............
5
posted on
05/11/2005 3:14:45 PM PDT
by
Jaded
(Hell sometimes has flourescent lighting and a trumpet.)
To: LibWhacker
"A life-like prosthetic penis called the Whizzinator..."
What an opening line, LoL
6
posted on
05/11/2005 3:15:07 PM PDT
by
nuconvert
(No More Axis of Evil by Christmas ! TLR) [there's a lot of bad people in the pistachio business])
To: LibWhacker
The owners were required to provide financial and operational records by Monday and to appear at a congressional hearing on Tuesday.I bet the media is all over this one. Pixelated footage anyone?
7
posted on
05/11/2005 3:15:23 PM PDT
by
konaice
To: Wolfie
I understand Barney Frank subpoenaed 25 of them for investigatory purposes.
To: LibWhacker
Of course, this is all from that august body that wouldn't dream of passing legislation requiring drug testing of its members.
9
posted on
05/11/2005 3:16:58 PM PDT
by
Wolfie
To: LibWhacker
I'll hold my opinion until Barney Frank weighs in.
10
posted on
05/11/2005 3:17:15 PM PDT
by
auboy
To: MeanWestTexan
You spelled it wrong. Its "sub-peenie".
11
posted on
05/11/2005 3:17:53 PM PDT
by
Wolfie
To: LibWhacker
Drug tests are unconstitutional - they violate the Fourth Amendment, and I don't care what the Supremos have to say about it either. I can read as well as they can.
To: LibWhacker
Most people use these products because of weed. I dont know why, they dont work and never will. The only way to remove THC from positive testing levels is to burn fat. The people using these products are getting a double whammy-losing their money and their jobs..
13
posted on
05/11/2005 3:19:09 PM PDT
by
cardinal4
(Newly Discovered breed of Cephalopod - Billius Fristus)
To: microgood
Drug tests are unconstitutional. Wrong. The Supremes, however, did strike down drug testing in one, count 'em, one case - when it was to be applied to judges and legislators. Go figure.
14
posted on
05/11/2005 3:20:04 PM PDT
by
Wolfie
To: LibWhacker
Remember: If fake urinating penises are outlawed, only outlaws will have fake urinating penises.
15
posted on
05/11/2005 3:20:16 PM PDT
by
Celtjew Libertarian
(Shake Hands with the Serpent: Poetry by Charles Lipsig aka Celtjew http://books.lulu.com/lipsig)
To: cardinal4
Most people use these products because of weed. I dont know why, they dont work and never will. The only way to remove THC from positive testing levels is to burn fat. Shh.... Don't tell Rep. Whitfield... He'll start looking for ways to ban treadmills and exercise bikes.
16
posted on
05/11/2005 3:21:43 PM PDT
by
Celtjew Libertarian
(Shake Hands with the Serpent: Poetry by Charles Lipsig aka Celtjew http://books.lulu.com/lipsig)
To: Wolfie
LOL!
Next article:
Voters object to fake balls on Lawmakers.
17
posted on
05/11/2005 3:24:04 PM PDT
by
JesseJane
(Close the Borders.)
To: Wolfie
Wrong.
I was posting what was actually the case, not what has been ruled on by SCOTUS. We Americans are the ultimate arbitrators as to what is constitutional, not the judges,IMHO.
when it was to be applied to judges and legislators. Go figure.
Scum is too nice a word for them.
To: Celtjew Libertarian
From a related article, the fake penis comes with de-hyrated urine (just add water!).
So it would work.
To: microgood
We Americans are the ultimate arbitrators as to what is constitutional, not the judges,IMHO. Oh, I completely agree. Frankly, I think our Founding Citizens were suckers to fall for the Constitution, the meaning of which could be changed at any time by 5 out of 9 lifetime political appointees.
20
posted on
05/11/2005 3:34:04 PM PDT
by
Wolfie
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson