Gee, let's see. Could it be a reaction to your post, "Forbidding oral hydration for comfort care was murder - a deliberate action intended to cause death by that direct action."?
You call a sitting judge a murderer, and you have the balls to ask ME why I'm so emotional? Stick to the facts of the case, assuming you know what they are, stay away from the conspiracy websites, and I'll welcome a civil debate with you.
You want to run with the black helicopter crowd, fine. But then you get what you deserve in the way of discourse.
I guess not. :(