First time I heard that. Is that in the agreement and order? If so, it is the judges's responsibility to find out why the doctors were unable to comply.
Give me a sec. I'll try and find it for you.
I have a faxed copy of the 32 page court order per Judge Boyd- trying to get it posted on the net right now-- will take a few minutes..
maybe more than a few--
But YES-- Judge Boyd verified that that was his court order. THe attorney for the family should have gone to the Judge when it was violated. It is the Dr that violeted it though- and ya don't want to make them mad- You needed them to say Mae should be treated and not left in Hospice
It is very messy-- this whole thing could have been handled better by BOTH sides-
I recognize this- but I am certainly in agreement on the side FOR LIFE-- NOT THE SIDE FOR DEATH!
(Sorry, should've hit preview first. Not sure what happened in my last attempt.)
Q. Didn't the Judge order the review to be concluded within 24 hours?
A. I am reading a copy of the actual order now. Beginning on page 2 and ending on page 3 of the court order I quote:
"As time is of the essence, the Court requests that the doctors confer and make their recommendation within 24 hours of this order, if possible, and if not possible, at the earliest possible time."
Email me if you'd like a copy of the court order. It is 32 pages long and is in e-fax format.
Someone is working on getting copies of the TRANSCRIPTS for the April 1 and April 4 hearings. These are the documents that are likely to fully expose the truth and the lies.
One thing I can clearly see from my reading so far -- with my dummy layperson's eyes -- the docs and Beth are using "dementia" and "incapacitation by reason of mental disability" as the purported reason for obtaining guardianship. (The cynic in me says: yeah, first drug 'em up til they can't think, then steal their guardianship.)