Posted on 04/07/2005 2:59:57 AM PDT by schmelvin
Didn't the Judge order the review to be concluded within 24 hours?
Gaddy's ATTY speaking to the LaGrange newspaper that Kenny boy says got it right..
"Gaddy has been taking care of her grandmother for 10 years, he said."
10 years and no problems........wow!
So, Beth traveled to UAB, then kicked them out and denied futher visitation? This girl just ain't right. No matter how you slice it. Even if The whole Alabama Gang is lying through their teeth (which I seriously doubt, those in the wrong are most certainly going to put the spin on it that puts them in the best light, especially since Terri)
She was deciding that Grandmamma was staying in the hospice even if it meant no feeding tube and she was absolutely not getting enough nutrition or hydration. If she was why should it take two days of intensive rehydration therapy? Anyway, is there a transcript or something I can reference for my emails? I'm not sure who to contact other than the judge and I keep getting a busy signal. If you've posted something just pop me the post number and I will get busy.
What is Beth doing in that room????(I know you can't answer it, I just worry)
First time I heard that. Is that in the agreement and order? If so, it is the judges's responsibility to find out why the doctors were unable to comply.
"Perhaps Grandmamma hadn't presented such a golden opportunity before."
Ken saw opportunities heh?
Ken didn't put her in a hospice, Smartaleck. Beth did that.
Give me a sec. I'll try and find it for you.
ignore him
The BEST info I have is here:
http://www.straightupwsherri.blogspot.com/
Aslo check Blogs FOr Terri for updates:
http://www.blogsforterri.com/
I'm confused - where and when did I make any such assertion?
I DID query as to why the doctors would have determined Mae was NOT terminal and had her airlifted to a hospital for medical treatment were it not so?
They made a MEDICAL decision - that happened to bear our what Kenneth was saying.
Are you deliberately trying to confuse the issue - or did you not read with comprehension?
Thank you eeevil, I am so aggravated that this woman can do this to the family. She appears to be taking her cues from Michael.
I have a faxed copy of the 32 page court order per Judge Boyd- trying to get it posted on the net right now-- will take a few minutes..
maybe more than a few--
But YES-- Judge Boyd verified that that was his court order. THe attorney for the family should have gone to the Judge when it was violated. It is the Dr that violeted it though- and ya don't want to make them mad- You needed them to say Mae should be treated and not left in Hospice
It is very messy-- this whole thing could have been handled better by BOTH sides-
I recognize this- but I am certainly in agreement on the side FOR LIFE-- NOT THE SIDE FOR DEATH!
my thinking too
(Sorry, should've hit preview first. Not sure what happened in my last attempt.)
Q. Didn't the Judge order the review to be concluded within 24 hours?
A. I am reading a copy of the actual order now. Beginning on page 2 and ending on page 3 of the court order I quote:
"As time is of the essence, the Court requests that the doctors confer and make their recommendation within 24 hours of this order, if possible, and if not possible, at the earliest possible time."
Email me if you'd like a copy of the court order. It is 32 pages long and is in e-fax format.
Someone is working on getting copies of the TRANSCRIPTS for the April 1 and April 4 hearings. These are the documents that are likely to fully expose the truth and the lies.
One thing I can clearly see from my reading so far -- with my dummy layperson's eyes -- the docs and Beth are using "dementia" and "incapacitation by reason of mental disability" as the purported reason for obtaining guardianship. (The cynic in me says: yeah, first drug 'em up til they can't think, then steal their guardianship.)
However, the point I made about the 24 hours seemed to be a pivotal point of misunderstanding bearing on the impression of malicious intent.
So,MACVSOG68, I will direct you to Sally's resources, she appears to be lady to see if you want to know something about the actual order. Bless you, Sally. ;-)
When these folks hold the power of life and death in their hands of your loved ones, I am sure there is a delicate dance to make sure you can get them safe, then, let litagation fly. Long sentence, I know, but typing out emails trying to keep an eye on several different websites for updates, and hope you will forgive the poor grammar.
guess I.m now a cynic too! :O)
Back in the Wendland case, (Calif 1997) Judge McNatt - before he ruled, WENT TO SEE the patient personally - He did not go on someone's word, totally.
And he made a very different decision. WE need more Judge McNatts.
http://www.angelfire.com/ca7/robertsangels/WendlandToLive.html
My poor little browser window is working overtime,seems I have everything open.
I am a cynic I guess, I'm more cautious of Beth's ACTIONS in this case.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.