Skip to comments.
POLL? Who's the villain in the Terri Schiavo case?
PHX news
| 3/24/05
| AZ Righty
Posted on 03/24/2005 11:50:52 AM PST by AZ Righty
Who's the villain in the Terri Schiavo case?
(49%) Her husband
(24%) The government
(14%) Her parents
(12%) The media
TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: clintonjudges; evildoers; schiavo; terri; terrischiavo
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220, 221-240, 241-260 ... 461-478 next last
To: ContraryMary
Hey, the statistic speaks for itself... 1 in 4 of the females who are killed each year are killed by their husbands... A lot of people feel murder is better than going through a costly divorce...
I think Michael Shiavo may be one of them.
To: G.Mason
222
posted on
03/24/2005 12:50:39 PM PST
by
Darksheare
(Gravity - Fear = SPLAT!)
To: AZ Righty
223
posted on
03/24/2005 12:51:42 PM PST
by
bert
(Peace is only halftime !)
To: The Hollywood Conservative
"If my wife (god forbid) were in this position, and I 'thought' she wouldn't want to live like this, but her family thought I was incorrect, I WOULD DEFER TO HER BLOOD FAMILY. The difference, a husband can divorce his wife, but parents are blood FOREVER."
A logical, well reasoned statement You need a new tagline.
224
posted on
03/24/2005 12:51:47 PM PST
by
international american
(Tagline now fireproof....purchased from "Conspiracy Guy Custom Taglines"LLC)
To: The Hollywood Conservative
Those are pretty weak statistics, as indicated by your refusal to post hard numbers.
To: Trust but Verify
I hope you never find yourself in that situation.
We would have to change your screen name.
To: AZ Righty
The issue is property rights and limited government. You cannot see the forest for the trees...
To: DJ MacWoW
"Schiavo wants to marry the mother of his 2 kids in Catholic church. Can't do that if the current wife is alive and divorced."
In addition, he ordered that she be cremated, no autopsy. There are many unexplained broken bones and head injuries, including why her heart stopped in the first place. He is too eager, and has been for 7 years. It's about him, not what she wanted. She is not sick, she is not brain dead. There is no reason to kill her.
228
posted on
03/24/2005 12:54:05 PM PST
by
gidget7
To: G.Mason
No, I couldn't turn it around. A criminal investigation started but was stopped all of the sudden; they closed the case before being investigated.
To: ContraryMary
Mary
Hard numbers
Its about 1000 per year.
Last year it was 975...
To: bikepacker67
" Using that convoluted logic, every severely mentally handicapped person can be systematically put to death."There you go again.
You conveniently left off only if they must be fed as part of life support.
231
posted on
03/24/2005 12:54:30 PM PST
by
G.Mason
(The replies by this poster are meant for self-amusement only. Read at your own discretion.)
To: Irish Rose
I think that the people who believe Michael Schiavo should be allowed to starve his wife are libertarians, not conservatives. I would guess they're the same people who think abortion should be legal. They seem to think that the killing of the unborn - and Terri Schiavo - is a "private" matter, "in our bedrooms", and the government is intruding if it gets involved.PING!
Comment #233 Removed by Moderator
To: CajunConservative
>>Isn't that why Kervorkian is in jail? <<
I had not thought of this. Krevorkian could probably request a new trial if the Judicial that sentenced him does exactly what he did.
Muleteam1
To: G.Mason
You conveniently forget that a pacemaker is more 'life support' than a feeding tube is.
235
posted on
03/24/2005 12:55:35 PM PST
by
Darksheare
(Gravity - Fear = SPLAT!)
To: angelanddevil2
Hmmmmm ... I wonder why?
Crooked judges and all that?
236
posted on
03/24/2005 12:55:39 PM PST
by
G.Mason
(The replies by this poster are meant for self-amusement only. Read at your own discretion.)
To: frogjerk; AZ Righty
The issue is property rights and limited government. You cannot see the forest for the trees...
It is unfortunately the ones who claim to be on Terri's side that cannot see where this will lead. When we give to Congress the right to decide who should live, we are, by extension, giving them the right to decide who should not live. I, for one, do not want to start down that road.
To: The Hollywood Conservative
1000 per year? Then how many divorces are there on average in a given year?
To: Darksheare
Yeah right.
I'll bet they even can eat and have brains.
239
posted on
03/24/2005 12:57:07 PM PST
by
G.Mason
(The replies by this poster are meant for self-amusement only. Read at your own discretion.)
To: Darksheare
My husband and I discussed this at length last night, for about the fourth time this week. We've both made it clear to each other and to our families that we'll haunt anyone who keeps us plugged into anything without hope of recovery.
And we both having living wills. There won't be an issue with us.
240
posted on
03/24/2005 12:57:08 PM PST
by
Not A Snowbird
(Official RKBA Landscaper and Arborist, Pajama Duchess of Green Leafy Things)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220, 221-240, 241-260 ... 461-478 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson