1 posted on
01/22/2005 1:05:49 PM PST by
Ramonan
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-35 next last
To: Ramonan
2 posted on
01/22/2005 1:06:32 PM PST by
zzen01
To: Ramonan
If they want a private beach far away from where families will be, then them go topless. I, of course, will be proud to lead a FReep there to protest them.
3 posted on
01/22/2005 1:08:39 PM PST by
doug from upland
(THE RED STATES - celebrate a great American tradition)
To: Ramonan
I think it should be legal. There is nothing wrong with a topless woman.
I would rather my kids see a topless woman on television than a murder. Unfortunately, in our day and culture they can easily see murder and even torture on television, but god forbid that they see a breast.
It's just common sense.
5 posted on
01/22/2005 1:08:57 PM PST by
Bon mots
To: Ramonan
If the lawsuit succeeds, then camera shops and photo developement labs will see an increase in business.
To: Ramonan
saying the ban is the last criminal sanction that treats women differently than men.Uhh... could possibly have something to do with the, ahem, difference between the chest of a woman and the chest of a man?
While am I not surprised that the libs think recognizing differences in human anatomy is sexist. . . .
7 posted on
01/22/2005 1:09:23 PM PST by
explodingspleen
(http://mish-mash.info/)
To: Ramonan
You didn't read the unwritten forum rules that should state that you cannot post threads with certain keywords unless you also post pics.
8 posted on
01/22/2005 1:09:47 PM PST by
umgud
To: Ramonan
9 posted on
01/22/2005 1:09:49 PM PST by
melbell
(There are 10 types of people in the world...those who understand binary, and those who don't.)
To: Ramonan
Will she complain if she's leered at and photographed while topless?
10 posted on
01/22/2005 1:09:55 PM PST by
SmithL
(ex-Boomer Rider)
To: Ramonan
This is militant feminism at it's most ridiculous. How many chicks out there are screaming for the right to show their boobs?
14 posted on
01/22/2005 1:11:37 PM PST by
MisterRepublican
("I must go. I must be elusive.")
To: Ramonan
Stupid. If you make them commonplace, nobody will think they're cool anymore. : )
To: Ramonan
Spent the last of December on South Beach, Miami.
Lovely, lovely, lovely beaches.
To: Ramonan
Who's got a recent pic of The Swimmer at the beach?
To: Ramonan
19 posted on
01/22/2005 1:12:53 PM PST by
Drango
(To Serve Man.....IT'S A COOKBOOK!)
To: Ramonan
I vote yes with an age limit and a restriction that fat, out of shape men (if you know what I mean) should not be permitted to jog in public without a shirt.
20 posted on
01/22/2005 1:13:07 PM PST by
garyhope
To: Ramonan
The ones who shouldn't will, and the ones that should won't. That's just the way the world works.
22 posted on
01/22/2005 1:13:21 PM PST by
NeoCaveman
(Problem hotline: to cope with PEST press 1, to yell we're all doomed press 2)
To: Ramonan
23 posted on
01/22/2005 1:13:33 PM PST by
ORECON
(Condi Rice/Ann Coulter - 2008)
To: Ramonan
She flashed images on a screen of the big-breasted male evildoer from "Austin Powers: The Spy Who Shagged Me," as she spoke. That's not an argument in favor of toplessness by women -- its an argument in favor of making men wear shirts!
27 posted on
01/22/2005 1:15:00 PM PST by
BenLurkin
(Big government is still a big problem.)
To: Ramonan
Why are the people who want to troop around naked always the last people who should ever be naked in public?
To: Ramonan
I think this would be great, although there should be age and weight limits. For the men too. And while we're at it, a ban on old guys wearing speedos.
To: Ramonan
Sorry her car broke down on the way to the beach.

36 posted on
01/22/2005 1:18:34 PM PST by
HuntsvilleTxVeteran
(So I talk to myself, at least I am talking to a mind that is my equal)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-35 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson