Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 12/22/2004 11:56:06 AM PST by qam1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last
To: qam1

Anyone who has the gall to claim the Beatles sucked knows effin' zip about music.


29 posted on 12/22/2004 12:07:02 PM PST by Hemingway's Ghost (Spirit of '75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: qam1
CON
30 posted on 12/22/2004 12:07:06 PM PST by BenLurkin (Big government is still a big problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: qam1
"While my Guitar Gently Weeped"

"Julia"

"Day in the Life"

"Norwegian Wood"

"Here Comes the Sun"

"Penny Lane"

"For No One"

Simple beautiful music, lyrically complex and many new recording techniques invented and used for the first time. If you can't enjoy their music it's only because you can't understand where Rock was and where they took it. To give you a hint, "Sugar Shack" was a hit on the charts shortly before The Beatles arrived.

32 posted on 12/22/2004 12:07:24 PM PST by muir_redwoods
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: qam1

The Beatles wer great. No comparison to the trash put out today. They were revolutionary in many ways....using orchestra music, mixing, on and on. Only a person with little knowledge of the evolution of music would not recognize their contributions. As far as songs..Yesterday, My Life, side 2 of Abbey Road, ER, etc. Pick up the CD that documents how these songs were put together. No one did these things before them.


35 posted on 12/22/2004 12:08:08 PM PST by arkfreepdom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: qam1

The Beatles were timeless. 100 years from now their music will still be listened to and discussed/studied, as will the whole "Beatlemania" era.

Sure, someone else would have come along eventually, but at the time they changed music completely. Music was stagnating, with artists like Pat Boone being at the top of the charts. The Beatles gave popular music a swift kick in the pants and started the ball rolling.

I can understand how some people (as is evidenced in this thread) don't like them, but to ignore their influence on popular music and culture is folly.

Personally, I love their music and always will.


37 posted on 12/22/2004 12:09:01 PM PST by TruBluKentuckian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: qam1
People...music is the dumbest thing to argue about. What you don't like, someone else loves...It is as diverse as humanity...the whole debate just gets people angry. If you fell for this, your just spoiling for a fight! The Beatles, Stones, Hendrix, Cream, classical, jazz, big band...something for everyone.
40 posted on 12/22/2004 12:09:45 PM PST by Edgerunner (Don't pay attention to me, ..I haven't been here long enough to have any credibility...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: qam1
While I think the Beatles are a little overrated, they are still better than 99.99999% of the crap out today.

Taxman, Back in the USSR, I am the Walrus, Hey Bulldog, Hard Day's Night, Let it Be - all great songs.

41 posted on 12/22/2004 12:09:53 PM PST by Dan from Michigan ("BZZZZZT You are fined one credit for violation of the Verbal Morality Statute")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: qam1

"then quit on a high note with the peerless Abbey Road."

No, they had the forgettable "Let it Be" album.

The "against" guy is all wet. Measured aganst the absolute wasteland of the '60's music the Beatles were a shining star: fresh, innovative, extremely listenable. Give 'em a 85 because you could dance to it.[You old fogies know what that means...]
There were others coming like the Grateful Dead and Quicksilver Messenger Service and Jefferson Airplane...but they weren't there yet. The Beatles were there first.

You poor guys and gals who were born in too late...you missed something special thats hasn't happened since.


43 posted on 12/22/2004 12:10:19 PM PST by Adder (Can we bring back stoning again? Please?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: qam1
Annoying: I much prefer endlessly droning 14 Hz bass drumbeats played at 130 dB underneath a tuneless monotone about Ho's, Bitch Slappin', Chillin' wit mah Homies, Killin' da Man, and Crusin' wit mah Pimped Out Ride.
46 posted on 12/22/2004 12:11:21 PM PST by DoctorMichael (The Fourth Estate is a Fifth Column!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: qam1
Listen to rock 'n' roll and pop before them and then after them. The musical difference is enormous, and you don't even have to like their stuff to come to that conclusion. I still think the Stones were/are a better rock band, but the Beatles didn't really play a lot of rock after Sgt Pepper anyhow.
47 posted on 12/22/2004 12:11:35 PM PST by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: qam1
I'm with the first guy, although I can't listen to anything pre-Sgt. Pepper, and I can't take the nonsense lyrics in songs like "A Day in the Life," "I am the Walrus," etc.

The white album is my favorite. It's amazingly diverse.

49 posted on 12/22/2004 12:11:50 PM PST by Aquinasfan (Isaiah 22:22, Rev 3:7, Mat 16:19)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: qam1

The first album I ever bought was "The Beatles First Album", the year it came out. I played it over and over on my turntable and memorized all the lyrics to all the songs. I thought "I Wanna Be Your Man" was kind of dirty. And I followed the position of all the Beatles' songs on the Hit Parade. I rejoiced when one of their songs knocked Elvis out of first place.


50 posted on 12/22/2004 12:12:15 PM PST by Ciexyz (I use the term Blue Cities, not Blue States. PA is red except for Philly, Pgh & Erie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: qam1; 537cant be wrong; Aeronaut; bassmaner; Bella_Bru; cgk; ChadGore; Cutterjohnmhb; Churchjack; ..
qam1, can you ping either myself or weegee to music articles? Thanks!

Rock and Roll PING! email Weegee to get on/off this list (or grab it yourself to PING the rest)

54 posted on 12/22/2004 12:12:53 PM PST by t_skoz ("let me be who I am - let me kick out the jams!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: qam1

I discovered the Beatles a good 10 years after they split, but to this day, their music stands as classic. They deserve all the accolades they got and more.


65 posted on 12/22/2004 12:16:04 PM PST by Melas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: qam1

I laughed my A$$ off at all my silly friends who were buying up every Beatle record they could find to spin them backwards for the "Paul is dead" clues. It was even more entertaining than when Iron Butterfly showed up for a concert at Penn State (1969)with NO INSTRUMENTS because they'd been confiscated that day in Canada. The organist got up to the mike and asked if anyone would be willing to loan them guitars, amps, drums, etc.


68 posted on 12/22/2004 12:16:39 PM PST by NRA1995 ("Yew jes' go and lay yore hand on a Pittsburgh Steelers fan & Ah think yer gonna fin'lly understand")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: qam1
And Wings. Don't get me started on McCartney's sad side project. That's another story.

Although a few of Paul's solo efforts were less than average, there were a couple standouts -- Band on the Run and Wings Over America. The latter was recorded during the 1976 tour. .....an amazing show (I saw the L.A. Forum gig).

69 posted on 12/22/2004 12:17:15 PM PST by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: qam1

THREE GOOD SONGS? AHEM.

Yesterday. Getting Better. Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band. Get Back. While My Guitar Gently Weeps. Two of Us. Here Comes the Sun. Let it Be. Maxwell's Silver Hammer. When I'm Sixty-Four. Blackbird. Revolution (not #9). Across the Universe. Long and Winding Road. Eleanor Rigby. Penny Lane. Magical Mystery Tour. Strawberry Fields Forever.

Get the point? That's a lot more than three.


71 posted on 12/22/2004 12:17:32 PM PST by Calvarys_Soldier (Christmas is not about Santa or Snowman. It's about a far more important "S" word: SAVIOR.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: qam1

In my opinion only......

To say that the Beatles suck is like saying that the BeeGees suck. In order to say that, one must only listen to their top 40 hits.

If one would like to appreciate either band, one must listen to all of their music.

I know the top 40 stuff of the Beatles. Those songs are part of the soundtrack of my life. Because of an older sister who won a "Hard Days Night" album from WIXY 1260 in Cleveland, the songs are familiar and comforting. I am not a big fan, but they did change our culture. I can't say for the better.

The BeeGees are the same. Because of the "Saturday Night Fever" era, people think their music is garbage. However, listening to the "Nights on Broadway" era of their music is my favorite.

But all in all, it's opinion, nothing more. If someone is stating an opinion, I feel that they should hear the entire library.


72 posted on 12/22/2004 12:17:52 PM PST by netmilsmom (Zell on DEM Christianity, "They can hum the tune, but can't sing the song.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: qam1
Did you know that Paul McCartney was in a band before Wings?

Sorry couldn't resist... :0)

76 posted on 12/22/2004 12:19:02 PM PST by COBOL2Java (If this isn't the End Times it certainly is a reasonable facsimile...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: qam1
The Beatles are responsible for some of the stupidest lyrics ever written. Furthermore, Paul McCartney's Christmas songs are dumb...pure dumb. I thought they were so great the first time I heard them. But, like musical Chinese food, they were not filling. The more I listened to them, the more insipid they seemed. Now I turn off the radio if one of his Christmas songs comes on. Lyrics are poetry---and some many first-graders have written better songs about Christmas than he has. On the other hand, he would have been great in advertising.

His one-liners (the extent of the words in his works) would be great in 20-second soundbytes.

80 posted on 12/22/2004 12:20:11 PM PST by MHT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson