Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Beatles: icon or con?
Sidney Morning Herald ^ | 12/22/04 | Greg Hassall and Charles Purcell

Posted on 12/22/2004 11:56:06 AM PST by qam1

Greg Hassall and Charles Purcell do battle over the fab four.

FOR

OK, Ob-la-di Ob-la-da is the most annoying song ever written. And you won't find Revolution No 9 on too many iPods. But how many bands' dud tracks can you count on one hand? The Beatles deserve their place in the pop pantheon. They revolutionised the way pop music was written, recorded and talked about. They were funny, charismatic, hungry to learn and unafraid of controversy. They matured spectacularly over seven tumultuous years, then quit on a high note with the peerless Abbey Road.

They were a genuine band, in that the whole was greater than the sum of its parts. The three writers spurred each other on and checked each other's excesses (McCartney's sentimentality, Lennon's bile and Harrison's cod mysticism). In one throwaway B-side, Rain, they created the template for psychedelic Britpop, a genre lesser bands spend an entire career mining. Their refusal to write the same song twice resulted in a catalogue of breathtaking diversity, while producer George Martin gave the recordings a unique, uncluttered sound that refuses to date. And, as the age of the drum solo dawned, Ringo kept it real, underpinning the Beatles' sound with undemonstrative precision.

Greg Hassall

AGAINST

Pretty much everyone in the '60s must have been on drugs - that's the only reason I can imagine why the Beatles were so popular. They had about three decent songs: Lucy in the Sky with Diamonds, Eleanor Rigby - and that other one, the one that doesn't suck. It's a riddle greater than the pyramids as to why a group of English fops with ridiculous hairstyles could make entire crowds of grown adults faint in awe. John Lennon? A prancing popinjay. Paul McCartney? A ponce. George Harrison? Vanity in the shape of a man. Ringo Starr?

A cool dude - the only one.

OK, so the Beatles recorded on top of a building. Big deal. OK, so they hung out with the Maharishi. Is that supposed to give their dire tunes spiritual worth?

"But they were a major influence in the history of rock'n'roll," some might bleat. Sure they were - but does that mean the baby boomers have to force their boring Beatlemania down our craws year after year, decade after decade?

I'm glad Yoko Ono helped split them up. She's the true heroine of this story. Too bad she's also a lousy artist.

And Wings. Don't get me started on McCartney's sad side project. That's another story.

- Charles Purcell


TOPICS: Music/Entertainment
KEYWORDS: 60s; babyboomers; beatlemania; beatles; christmastimeishere; genx; rock; rockandroll; rockmusic; the60s; thebeatles; thesixties
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 341-358 next last
To: qam1
While I think the Beatles are a little overrated, they are still better than 99.99999% of the crap out today.

Taxman, Back in the USSR, I am the Walrus, Hey Bulldog, Hard Day's Night, Let it Be - all great songs.

41 posted on 12/22/2004 12:09:53 PM PST by Dan from Michigan ("BZZZZZT You are fined one credit for violation of the Verbal Morality Statute")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hemingway's Ghost

I don't know much about the technical side of music, but I agree that their stuff is a pleasure to listen to. And anything that can drive Brian Wilson insane can't be all bad....


42 posted on 12/22/2004 12:10:19 PM PST by cspackler (There are 10 kinds of people in this world, those who understand binary and those who don't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: qam1

"then quit on a high note with the peerless Abbey Road."

No, they had the forgettable "Let it Be" album.

The "against" guy is all wet. Measured aganst the absolute wasteland of the '60's music the Beatles were a shining star: fresh, innovative, extremely listenable. Give 'em a 85 because you could dance to it.[You old fogies know what that means...]
There were others coming like the Grateful Dead and Quicksilver Messenger Service and Jefferson Airplane...but they weren't there yet. The Beatles were there first.

You poor guys and gals who were born in too late...you missed something special thats hasn't happened since.


43 posted on 12/22/2004 12:10:19 PM PST by Adder (Can we bring back stoning again? Please?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: muir_redwoods
"Love Me, Do"

"Please, Please Me"

"Lay Down Your Arms"

44 posted on 12/22/2004 12:10:34 PM PST by GVnana (If I had a Buckhead moment would I know it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Rebelbase
Cultural maybe, but I am not so sure about musical.

They were accessible and along with many others found foundation within blues, gospel and early rock.

But they did not anymore greatly expand the horizons of music.
45 posted on 12/22/2004 12:11:01 PM PST by CyberCowboy777 (I know there's good will toward men on account of that Baby born in Bethlehem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: qam1
Annoying: I much prefer endlessly droning 14 Hz bass drumbeats played at 130 dB underneath a tuneless monotone about Ho's, Bitch Slappin', Chillin' wit mah Homies, Killin' da Man, and Crusin' wit mah Pimped Out Ride.
46 posted on 12/22/2004 12:11:21 PM PST by DoctorMichael (The Fourth Estate is a Fifth Column!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: qam1
Listen to rock 'n' roll and pop before them and then after them. The musical difference is enormous, and you don't even have to like their stuff to come to that conclusion. I still think the Stones were/are a better rock band, but the Beatles didn't really play a lot of rock after Sgt Pepper anyhow.
47 posted on 12/22/2004 12:11:35 PM PST by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rebelbase; Maceman
I am basically neutral on this subject, but here's an interesting collection of MP3s I saw posted on a blog the other day:

The Beatles | Christmas Records

If you were fortunate enough to have been a member of the official Beatles fan club between 1963 and 1969, then you likely have heard one or more of these records. The Beatles recorded them and sent them out to their adoring fans every year, finally collecting them all on one album for the 1970 edition. Now rare and quite pricey to obtain, these seldom heard recordings offer a rare glimpse of the fabs at their funniest.


48 posted on 12/22/2004 12:11:39 PM PST by Constitution Day (goo goo g'joob)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: qam1
I'm with the first guy, although I can't listen to anything pre-Sgt. Pepper, and I can't take the nonsense lyrics in songs like "A Day in the Life," "I am the Walrus," etc.

The white album is my favorite. It's amazingly diverse.

49 posted on 12/22/2004 12:11:50 PM PST by Aquinasfan (Isaiah 22:22, Rev 3:7, Mat 16:19)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: qam1

The first album I ever bought was "The Beatles First Album", the year it came out. I played it over and over on my turntable and memorized all the lyrics to all the songs. I thought "I Wanna Be Your Man" was kind of dirty. And I followed the position of all the Beatles' songs on the Hit Parade. I rejoiced when one of their songs knocked Elvis out of first place.


50 posted on 12/22/2004 12:12:15 PM PST by Ciexyz (I use the term Blue Cities, not Blue States. PA is red except for Philly, Pgh & Erie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rebelbase
For sheer musical and cultural impact in history there is none that compare to the Beatles. Zip Zilch Nada Zero Goose Egg None.

Which is the very reason why some snobby critics hate the Beatles. They are an easy target. I have to admit that I wasn't much into the Beatles on the first go round (even though I was old enough). It wasn't until I was in college and a friend played "Tomorrow Never Knows" for me, and I learned it was from 1966, that I began to explore them. So they have some clunkers. They also had three great songwriters--and a great producer--who were able to put their words and music and musicianship together to create some indelible masterpieces.
51 posted on 12/22/2004 12:12:22 PM PST by drjimmy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Frumanchu

The Hives, Vines, White Stripes, Franz Ferdinand, Evanescence


52 posted on 12/22/2004 12:12:44 PM PST by Cogadh na Sith (--Scots Gaelic: 'War or Peace'--)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

gator,
you are right on about the Kinks. Great straight ahead Rock & Roll at times, funny at times (unlike the Beatles), and some of their late 70's/early eighties stuff was a kick in the pants. Too bad the Davies brothers hated each other's guts.

On a side note, Chrissie Hynde of Pretenders fame left Ray Davies standing on the alter. Four husbands later, I'm sure Ray is relieved he didn't hitch with the slimy skank.


53 posted on 12/22/2004 12:12:46 PM PST by pissant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: qam1; 537cant be wrong; Aeronaut; bassmaner; Bella_Bru; cgk; ChadGore; Cutterjohnmhb; Churchjack; ..
qam1, can you ping either myself or weegee to music articles? Thanks!

Rock and Roll PING! email Weegee to get on/off this list (or grab it yourself to PING the rest)

54 posted on 12/22/2004 12:12:53 PM PST by t_skoz ("let me be who I am - let me kick out the jams!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

Kinks were great too. Did you hear that live version on the Sopranos last season? "I'm Not Like Everybody Else"


55 posted on 12/22/2004 12:13:13 PM PST by dennisw (Help put the "Ch" back in Chanukah)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Junior_G; HenryLeeII
I'm curious as to what sort of crappy music all these oh-so-contrarian "The Beatles sucked" posters listen to.

Yeah, I'm wondering the same. Who was it that said that not liking the Beatles is as perverse as not liking the sun? They were right.

56 posted on 12/22/2004 12:13:15 PM PST by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Xenalyte

You're too young! That's why.


57 posted on 12/22/2004 12:13:21 PM PST by dmz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Junior_G
Let's see . . . my favorite band is Sonic Youth, closely followed by the Muffs.

Tom Waits is a genius. Frank Zappa was a genius.

Sebadoh is always worth a listen. The Beastie Boys really rock, especially for forty-something white guys. De La Soul is highly recommended.

Right now, there's a Cast in Bronze CD in my player.
58 posted on 12/22/2004 12:14:08 PM PST by Xenalyte (Surf's up, space ponies! I'm making gravy without the lumps!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: sinanju

"Junior's Farm" is the best song McCartney has ever been involved with.


59 posted on 12/22/2004 12:14:46 PM PST by Xenalyte (Surf's up, space ponies! I'm making gravy without the lumps!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: sinanju

I was born in 1960. My mom always enjoyed the Beach Boys and my Dad was a Tito Puente fan who also like the Stones. The Beatles were ok. Looking back now they were a packaged product, not unlike any boy band out there today.

If Sgt Pepper was an album coming out today, what would be the lead track that MTV would play? BY the way, the third song in my opinion was "Slow Down."


60 posted on 12/22/2004 12:15:04 PM PST by EQAndyBuzz (60 votes and the world changes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 341-358 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson