Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The degrees of euthanasia: Where do you draw the line
euthanasia.com ^ | unknown | euthanasia.com

Posted on 12/17/2004 3:36:03 PM PST by walford

Euthanasia Definitions

* Euthanasia: the intentional killing by act or omission of a dependent human being for his or her alleged benefit. (The key word here is "intentional". If death is not intended, it is not an act of euthanasia)
* Voluntary euthanasia: When the person who is killed has requested to be killed.
* Non-voluntary: When the person who is killed made no request and gave no consent.
* Involuntary euthanasia: When the person who is killed made an expressed wish to the contrary.
* Assisted suicide: Someone provides an individual with the information, guidance, and means to take his or her own life with the intention that they will be used for this purpose. When it is a doctor who helps another person to kill themselves it is called "physician assisted suicide."
* Euthanasia By Action: Intentionally causing a person's death by performing an action such as by giving a lethal injection.
* Euthanasia By Omission: Intentionally causing death by not providing necessary and ordinary (usual and customary) care or food and water.

What Euthanasia is NOT: There is no euthanasia unless the death is intentionally caused by what was done or not done. Thus, some medical actions that are often labeled "passive euthanasia" are no form of euthanasia, since the intention to take life is lacking. These acts include not commencing treatment that would not provide a benefit to the patient, withdrawing treatment that has been shown to be ineffective, too burdensome or is unwanted, and the giving of high doses of pain-killers that may endanger life, when they have been shown to be necessary. All those are part of good medical practice, endorsed by law, when they are properly carried out.



TOPICS: Health/Medicine; Religion; Science; Society
KEYWORDS: assistedsuicide; disability; kevorkian; mercykilling; schiavo
I have a problem with all of them. Dr. Kevorkian was offing people who were not terminally ill. Some of them were merely suffering from depression because they suffering in various degress from chronic conditions. They should have been given counseling before coming to that point. That is why Dr. Jack rightfully languishes in jail, having been convicted by a jury of his peers.

Knowing a bit about this subject, some people who are suicidal will left-handedly ask others for permission. To have a doctor be in the position of possbly assuring a person that it's all right to kill his/herself arguably violates the Hippocratic Oath.

I can certainly understand the compassion of not wanting someone to be left to suffer needlessly when they no longer have any chance of a productive life. I think that a line has to be drawn when it involves other people participating in that decision and process. Whether a life is worth living must be left to the person themself alone.

1 posted on 12/17/2004 3:36:04 PM PST by walford
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: walford

..."...the compassion of not wanting someone to be left to suffer needlessly when they no longer have any chance of a productive life."...


2 posted on 12/17/2004 6:59:54 PM PST by jolie560
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson