Skip to comments.
Consider this regarding Scott Peterson [Vanity]
Posted on 12/13/2004 3:23:03 PM PST by bushisdamanin04
Scott Peterson is going to death row, in part, for killing his unborn son. Laci Peterson, on the other hand, was free to kill that very same unborn son without suffering a legal penalty of any type.
Food for thought.
TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: peterson; preborn; scott; unborn
To: bushisdamanin04
He hasn't been sentenced yet,
2
posted on
12/13/2004 3:24:00 PM PST
by
annyokie
(If the shoe fits, put 'em both on!)
To: anniegetyourgun
3
posted on
12/13/2004 3:24:43 PM PST
by
annyokie
(If the shoe fits, put 'em both on!)
To: bushisdamanin04
"Food for thought"
I think my brain would starve.
4
posted on
12/13/2004 3:25:07 PM PST
by
MaineRepublic
(Talk sense to a fool and he calls you foolish. -- Euripides)
To: bushisdamanin04
Women's rights and men's rights are two separate things. You know, equal protection under the law.
5
posted on
12/13/2004 3:25:24 PM PST
by
farmfriend
( In Essentials, Unity...In Non-Essentials, Liberty...In All Things, Charity.)
To: bushisdamanin04
Wow! Pretty deep!
That means Peterson should be set free, right? I mean, like, they want to kill him and stuff!
6
posted on
12/13/2004 3:26:40 PM PST
by
Glenn
(The two keys to character: 1) Learn how to keep a secret. 2) ...)
To: bushisdamanin04
In a drunken one-night stand, the jury conceived Scott Peterson.
They regret their mistake, and they're going to abort him.
7
posted on
12/13/2004 3:37:37 PM PST
by
clyde asbury
(Hey, waiter, bring me Volume Three of the wine list.)
To: bushisdamanin04
I have made this same argument for months with several pro-choicers who say that Peterson should fry.
8
posted on
12/13/2004 3:38:00 PM PST
by
RockinRight
(Liberals are OK with racism and sexism, as long as it is aimed at a Republican.)
To: bushisdamanin04
True, as per the rules:
1. A female may, at anytime before her baby is born, have it killed.
2. No male, without permission of a female, may cause her baby to be killed before it is born. A male who does so shall be sentenced to prison.
3. No male may have standing to save the life of a mother's baby if she wants it killed before birth. Males who attempt to save the life of a baby before it is born shall be sentenced to prison.
9
posted on
12/13/2004 3:38:11 PM PST
by
Enterprise
(The left hates the Constitution. Islamic Fascism hates America. Natural allies.)
To: Enterprise
Yep, pretty lousy system we have.
To: bushisdamanin04
Actually, after the second trimester in California, she couldn't have aborted the child without facing criminal penalties as well. She would have had to attempt to deliver the child.
11
posted on
12/13/2004 3:41:35 PM PST
by
kingu
(Which would you bet on? Iraq and Afghanistan? Or Haiti and Kosovo?)
To: kingu
No, that is not true. The Supreme Court cases of Roe, Bolton, and Carhart assure that a woman can abort her child at anytime up until the baby has 100% cleared the woman's body. Bolton held that a woman can abort even for emotional reasons and the decision is wholly between the woman and her doctor, and Carhart extends that to PBAs.
To: kingu
Could you provide a link to the California law which you believe outlaws abortion after the 2nd trimester? Thanks.
To: annyokie
To: bushisdamanin04
The real strange twist in the law is that a woman can decide to abort or not but the father has no say in the matter but is financially responsible if the woman chooses to keep the baby. So a man is told he should have kept it in his pants, but if anyone tells a woman she should have kept her knees together he is not only crude but in violation of Supreme Court doctrine.
To: Honestfreedom
The real strange twist in the law is that a woman can decide to abort or not but the father has no say in the matter but is financially responsible if the woman chooses to keep the baby. So a man is told he should have kept it in his pants, but if anyone tells a woman she should have kept her knees together he is not only crude but in violation of Supreme Court doctrine.
Very well said.
16
posted on
12/13/2004 6:30:51 PM PST
by
clyde asbury
(Hey, waiter, bring me Volume Three of the wine list.)
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson