Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: bushisdamanin04

The real strange twist in the law is that a woman can decide to abort or not but the father has no say in the matter but is financially responsible if the woman chooses to keep the baby. So a man is told he should have kept it in his pants, but if anyone tells a woman she should have kept her knees together he is not only crude but in violation of Supreme Court doctrine.


15 posted on 12/13/2004 3:54:53 PM PST by Honestfreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: Honestfreedom
The real strange twist in the law is that a woman can decide to abort or not but the father has no say in the matter but is financially responsible if the woman chooses to keep the baby. So a man is told he should have kept it in his pants, but if anyone tells a woman she should have kept her knees together he is not only crude but in violation of Supreme Court doctrine.

Very well said.


16 posted on 12/13/2004 6:30:51 PM PST by clyde asbury (Hey, waiter, bring me Volume Three of the wine list.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson