Posted on 12/08/2004 10:19:37 AM PST by Former Military Chick
REDWOOD CITY, Calif. — A former neighbor of Scott Peterson drew on her own family's experience with capital punishment Tuesday to try to dissuade jurors from sentencing the convicted killer to death.
Susan Medina, who lived across the street from Peterson and his wife, Laci, testified that, when she was a child in the Philippines, her grandfather was murdered and her father later watched as the killers were put to death in the electric chair.
"My father was the sweetest man in the world," Medina told a rapt courtroom in a voice barely above a whisper. "He witnessed it. He was never the same. Never spoke of it."
Jurors, who are to begin deliberating Peterson's fate Thursday, appeared riveted by Medina's account. One female panelist — No. 7 — wiped away tears as Medina's voice cracked with emotion.
The petite woman testified briefly in June in the guilt phase about neighborhood goings-on the day Laci Peterson was reported missing. Her testimony Tuesday touched only slightly on her interaction with the Petersons before defense attorney Pat Harris began questioning her about the potential impact of a death sentence.
Asked by Harris if she thought Peterson's life should be spared, Medina cried softly and then said, "I'm a nurse. I have witnessed the joy of childbirth and the sadness of death. In my mind, I have a mental collage of death. The people that were executed continue to haunt me."
After prosecutors declined to cross-examine Medina, she turned to the jury. "Have a Merry Christmas," she said.
After leaving the stand, Medina, who had been sitting behind Peterson's parents in the defense section before her testimony, approached Laci Peterson's mother, Sharon Rocha, who sat clutching a tissue in the front row. Medina leaned down, grasped Rocha's hand and spoke softly to her. Rocha nodded and whispered something back.
Medina's testimony was the most compelling of the six witnesses who took the stand on Peterson's behalf Tuesday. They included a former golf coach, a college professor and a business associate.
The jury will hear closing arguments Thursday and then start their deliberations. Once they begin weighing evidence, the panel will be sequestered.
In their deliberations, jurors can consider the character testimony of the defense witnesses as they decide whether Peterson deserves a sentence of death or life in prison without parole for murdering his wife and unborn son in December 2002.
Abbas Imani, who employed Peterson as a waiter for four years, called him "the politest and most courteous person I've ever met in my life." He said Peterson was exceptionally kind to his elderly customers, even serving one woman a meal on a tray in her car when she was too ill to come into the restaurant.
"Everybody is heartbroken," said Imani, who cried into a handkerchief throughout his testimony. "Such a tragic thing to happen to both families, just not believable."
Another witness, Eric Sheras, who lived near the couple in college, recalled Peterson as kind and even-tempered. He said that, when his dog fought with the couple's golden retriever, Mackenzie, Laci Peterson became angry and tried to punch his animal, but Peterson "calmed everyone down."
He described the Petersons as "an average couple" who rarely fought.
Jim Gray, who bought a packing business from Peterson and remained friends with him, told the jury he was "just a super guy" and that he and his wife were "the perfect couple."
"Laci was just a bubble and Scott would see this and cherish it," he said.
Peterson's golf coach at Cuesta College, Hugh Gerhardt, testified that Peterson was a good golfer who showed confidence, but not arrogance. He said that, when his brother went missing while snowmobiling, Peterson immediately called and offered to join the search effort.
Robert Thompson Jr., a college professor who taught both Scott and Laci Peterson in an agricultural economics course, recounted how the couple befriended him, inviting him to dinners and golf outings. He said Peterson, an "A-, B+" student, was memorable among the 10,000 students he taught in his career. "He seemed more mature, more focused, like he was fully formed and well raised. The kind of student who sticks out," he said.
Asked how a death sentence would affect him, Thompson answered, "It would be just like somebody ripped out my heart."
Prosecutor Dave Harris, who had not cross-examined any of the defense's previous 32 witnesses in the penalty phase, chose to ask Thompson a single question: "How has Laci's murder affected you?" Thompson acknowledged that he was close to the mother-to-be as well as her husband and replied, "I miss her terribly."
At the defense table, Peterson was uncharacteristically emotional. He wiped his reddened eyes with a tissue as Thompson and Imani testified.
Throughout the penalty phase, the defense has emphasized the damage a death verdict would do to Peterson's parents. Several witnesses have testified that such a sentence would destroy the family, especially the elder Petersons.
At a hearing Tuesday afternoon to discuss jury instructions, defense attorney Mark Geragos requested that Judge Alfred Delucchi not give the usual instruction to the panel to put aside sympathy for the defendant and his family. He argued that the Petersons qualified as victims because they were blood relatives of Scott and Laci Peterson's unborn child.
Delucchi, however, denied that motion, saying the law required him to give the instruction. It reads, "Evidence, if any, of the impact of an execution on family members should be disregarded unless it illuminates some positive quality of the defendant's background or character."
The panel of six men and six women convicted him Nov. 12 of two counts of murder.
You're right....no remorse is a big part of this. I think Geragos thought the jury wouldn't go for the death penalty and told Scott not to even think of a plea deal. And I'm sure he fed Scott the old bit....no one gets executed anymore.
That is all he asked!!!!
Well done!! It's about time that question was asked of all those hypocritical witnesses talking about what a great guy Scott was.
Then she should have stayed home.
My thoughts exactly...
These proceedings should stick to the case and the facts..
not all this blah blah blah of what a nice guy he was
until he murdered his wife and child...
I wonder what the impact would have been if the Prosecutor asked every single witness that one short question?
Geragos is in love with himself..which makes him a danger to his client..what are the odds that an appeal is filed alleging "inadequate representation?"
Has any lawyer claimed his own lousy defense as grounds for an appeal?
Jackie talking about her poor life growing up. Her adoption of the two kids.....she was young and stupid. blah blah blah. Basically she slept around. Now they are one big happy family.
All about Jackie
Probably...if the client has the $$$$ to pay for the appeal...but Scott's family is tapped out..
Get real. It's SCOTT that is the causing her all of her stress.
Yep. Geragos sucked the Petersons dry and Scott will have a public defender for the appeals. What I don't understand is why the Petersons hired him in the first place. Wasn't he on Greta's show and others talking about how guilty he thought Scott was? 'Course, I could be wrong about that, it was quite awhile ago.
Doesn't look to me like the Peterson's got their money's worth from Geragos.
Did you see the AP/Yahoo! headline about people "railing against killing Peterson" !!! Killing Scott Peterson?!! It's the death penalty, morons. There's a difference.
>All about Jackie
Jackie is the ultimate narcissist. It is apparently a hereditary trait.
Just watched Court TV......the observers are reporting that the jury is UNIMPRESSED with Jackie Peterson.
"Tragic" would have been if Laci and Conor had been accidentally killed in a car accident or had both died during childbirth. "Happen" is something that just occurs - this was a cold-blooded, calculated, willful act of murder by this monster Scott.
This family is the perfect match for Gerragos... unethical, inherently low life.
OK, I've got to come out and just admit it. I have scrupulously ignored the Peterson trial as much as I could. I was an O.J. trial junkie, but I just couldn't get in to this one.
So, I need a very short synopsis:
What convinced the jury?
They didn't find a murder weapon.
They didn't find physical evidence on Scott Peterson.
There were no eyewitnesses.
How was he convicted?
Even Saddam Hussein was cute as a child, until the day he ripped the heads off of the chickens his dad raised, for kicks.
If Geragos does, that may be a historical first.
"I thought the sentencing phase was about the guilt of the perpertrator"
Nope, that's the regular part of the trial, the penalty phase is an endevour to weigh the aggravating circumstances, which tip the scale toward death, and the mitigating circumstances, which tip it toward life.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.