Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

"Flight of the Phoenix" remake -- looks like it's in trouble
11/24/04

Posted on 11/24/2004 8:39:48 AM PST by pabianice

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-75 next last

"I knew James Stewart. James Stewart was a favorite of mine. You're no James Stewart."

1 posted on 11/24/2004 8:39:48 AM PST by pabianice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: pabianice

I loved that movie! As a former model airplane hobbyist, I loved the line "But the principles are the same!"


2 posted on 11/24/2004 8:42:07 AM PST by Yo-Yo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pabianice
Good. Hope it dies on the vine.

A_R

3 posted on 11/24/2004 8:42:47 AM PST by arkady_renko
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #4 Removed by Moderator

To: pabianice

I've seen previews for this, so it is getting some promotions. Looks terrible though, the good news is it will hopefully inspire them to release the original on DVD (much like the Oceans 11 remake did). That's about the best you can hope for these days from remakes, they make it easier to buy the original.


5 posted on 11/24/2004 8:43:39 AM PST by discostu (mime is money)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pabianice
Characters have been "updated for relevancy."

That should probably read "irrelevancy".

"That is precisely the reaction I would have expected from a man of your obvious limitations." -- Dorfmann

6 posted on 11/24/2004 8:44:20 AM PST by topcat54
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pabianice
Too bad. I loved the original and was looking forward to the remake.

I guess Oliver Stone must have been involved.

7 posted on 11/24/2004 8:44:40 AM PST by E. Pluribus Unum (Drug prohibition laws help fund terrorism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pabianice

"Characters have been "updated for relevancy."

I think this kind of marketing killed 'The Alamo' before it opened. It turned out to be a better film than it was promoted to be.


8 posted on 11/24/2004 8:45:45 AM PST by Spok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pabianice

Why can't these jackasses think up their own damned movies?


9 posted on 11/24/2004 8:46:25 AM PST by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Baynative

It's already been made, starring Dennis Quaid and a bunch of whodats.
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0377062/

Looks bad.


10 posted on 11/24/2004 8:46:26 AM PST by discostu (mime is money)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: pabianice
Characters have been "updated for relevancy."

We need a gay African-American handicapped Communist female for diversity! SOMEBODY FIND ME A GAY AFRICAN-AMERICAN HANDICAPPED COMMUNIST FEMALE!

11 posted on 11/24/2004 8:46:35 AM PST by TheBigB (<----still tired and red-eyed from this weekend's BAYWATCH marathon on TV Land.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pabianice
Oh... almost forgot. The remake also changes the plot line to make it about an evil oil company that goes around the world throwing people out of work and raping the environment for profit.

Hollywood morons.

12 posted on 11/24/2004 8:47:42 AM PST by pabianice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: discostu
they have released the original on DVD, i watched with with my father about a month ago and adore that movie now, if this remake turns out half as good ill be impressed, just looks like their relying on alot of special effects
13 posted on 11/24/2004 8:47:53 AM PST by blackeagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: discostu
It's already been made, starring Dennis Quaid and a bunch of whodats.

Made, yes. Released, no. And I love the list of "uncredited actors." How bad can it be that the actors don't want to be named??

14 posted on 11/24/2004 8:49:34 AM PST by pabianice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: pabianice
Ditto this one.

I wouldn't watch George Clooney for money.

He's a far cry talent from Rosemary

15 posted on 11/24/2004 8:50:50 AM PST by JimVT (I was born a Democrat..but then I grew up)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pabianice
Here is another bad idea from Hollywood. There was no reason to remake this film. I remember seeing this movie as a kid and back then thought it was a great adventure movie.
As an adult I still catch the original once in a great while but having seen the promos for the new film I just have no desire to see it.
Some films lend themselves to remakes and a great many don't. In our advanced technological age this film doesn't warrant a remake as with GPS, etc. these people could be found without resorting to the main plot idea.
So I predict another big bomb in the making here.
16 posted on 11/24/2004 8:51:49 AM PST by Captain Peter Blood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pabianice

Got the original on DVD. No sense in a any remake. Don't need explosions, computer generated FX...nothing. Leave the story ALONE!


17 posted on 11/24/2004 8:52:21 AM PST by Dallas59 ("A weak peace is worse than war" - Tacitcus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheBigB
Try Whoopie.

Well 4 out of 5 ain't bad.

18 posted on 11/24/2004 8:52:26 AM PST by JimVT (I was born a Democrat..but then I grew up)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: pabianice
Hi, pabiance: Re-makes as a rule bite. Classic films are of a time and place that make them memorable for years and years. Making them popular. With great acting, writing and direction. Remakes by nature would entail different directors, writers, cast and crew. Ruining a classic to the point where the only resemblance would be in the film's title... Jack.
19 posted on 11/24/2004 8:52:56 AM PST by Jack Deth (When In Doubt.... Empty The Magazine!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Spok

I think this kind of marketing killed 'The Alamo' before it opened. It turned out to be a better film than it was promoted to be.<<

If "The ALamo" turned out better than it was promoted, the promotions must have been pretty durn BAD!! (I never saw them).

I watched that revisionist POS movie-They sure downplayed the cowardice of the Mexican Army and Santa Ana. They didn't tell about the measley 18 minutes it took to overthrow the Meexicans whenthey were not fighting at 100 to 1 ratio and made it look less than tactical when help did not immediately arrive for those at the Alamo. It was HORRIBLE!!! Very Hollywood.


20 posted on 11/24/2004 8:53:15 AM PST by hushpad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-75 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson