Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 11/03/2004 7:02:31 AM PST by InfusedBand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: InfusedBand

I feel confident that this thing is over.

The media can try to skew things all they want. But the votes can't lie.


2 posted on 11/03/2004 7:04:27 AM PST by nuffsenuff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: InfusedBand

LOL


3 posted on 11/03/2004 7:04:33 AM PST by cripplecreek (We've turned the corner and we're not smokin crack.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: InfusedBand

http://www.peteandrews.net/whos_in_the_white_house.htm


4 posted on 11/03/2004 7:05:52 AM PST by fuzzy122 (GBGB [God Bless George Bush] and Our Armed Forces!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: InfusedBand

The state declare official winners, not the press. This is over, if the Democrats want to whine let them, their just doing more damage to their party.


6 posted on 11/03/2004 7:06:11 AM PST by whershey (www.worldwar4.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: InfusedBand

No, I think each network is holding off declaring enough states to be the one to declare Bush the winner. Fox and NBC declared Ohio for Bush, so they hold off declaring a NM or Iowa. The other networks have a different mix of undeclared states. Even with 99% of the vote in and Bush with a clear lead.


7 posted on 11/03/2004 7:06:11 AM PST by wide meadow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: InfusedBand

He threatened to vote against Bush as a protest, but unless he votes for Kerry, it still goes to the House. I think his intention was to vote for someone else as a protest and not if it altered the outcome.


8 posted on 11/03/2004 7:06:14 AM PST by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: InfusedBand; MeekOneGOP; SittinYonder

LOL, welcome to FR. You're right. Kerry's gonna win. lololol


9 posted on 11/03/2004 7:06:23 AM PST by eyespysomething (Idealism is fine, but as it approaches reality the cost becomes prohibitive.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: InfusedBand

If they call those states they have to give the race to GWB. They just can't bring themselves to do that yet.

We are witnessing the death of the MSM. Eulogies are in order.


10 posted on 11/03/2004 7:06:41 AM PST by Lovebloggers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: InfusedBand

Bush wins this, I think, with 286 EVs, no doubt.

But it's clear that the GOP needs to win every state by 5% or more to avoid dem whining. :-)


11 posted on 11/03/2004 7:07:26 AM PST by HitmanLV (I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered. My life is my own.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: InfusedBand

New Mexico had this problem last election. They have a large number of absentee votes. That being said, I think they could call the state for NM, but the Kerry campaign has probably asked them to hold off to ease the speculation that he should concede now rather than later. He's just buying some time.


12 posted on 11/03/2004 7:07:30 AM PST by Novel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: InfusedBand

Someone more familiar with the law and constitution will have to comment but that renigade elector would have a tough time justifying going first against the voters of his state and then against the majority of Americans. It would seem a legal challenge could be made that he was disenfranchising millions of voters.


14 posted on 11/03/2004 7:08:42 AM PST by thecanuck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: InfusedBand; eyespysomething
11/3/04

By not calling the other 4 states, they can try and skew things to have those states go to KERRY.

I see some funky stuff! Infused - welcome to blah blah blah - Listen up troll - In DU world the media may decide who wins by "calling" states for them, but in the real world it's the elections officials who make the decision. Kerry's lost. Crawl back under your rock.

17 posted on 11/03/2004 7:14:19 AM PST by SittinYonder (Tancredo and I wanna know what you believe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: InfusedBand
The media is no longer a factor.

The Bush campaign and the White House has their own election team of experts and they know that the President is gonna carry Nevada, New Mexico and Iowa. This is over.

18 posted on 11/03/2004 7:14:40 AM PST by Reagan Man (.....................................................The Choice is Clear....... Re-elect BUSH-CHENEY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: InfusedBand

The media is covering for Kerry to the bitter end by refusing to ackowledge Bush's victory in New Mexico and Iowa- NO ONE IN THE 4th ESTATE is willing to put Bush over the 270 electoral vote total!

Apparently the New Mexico and Iowa SecStates will have to make the announcement.


22 posted on 11/03/2004 7:21:23 AM PST by silverleaf (Fasten your seat belts- it's going to be a BUMPY ride.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: InfusedBand

Who exactly cares what the networks call or don't call. They have made their own commentary obsolete by providing real election results on the internet in real time.

I spent several hours last night following Florida counties. As soon as the big dem counties started reporting I knew Bush's margin was safe. I didn't need any help from the networks. It was simple math done on the Windows calculator.

Later in the evening I was able to do the same thing with Ohio. I know absolutely nothing about Ohio politics, but by doing a bit of arithmetic on partial returns I could see that Cleveland wasn't going to save Kerry. All you have to do is take the partial percentage of any big county and project that percentage to the total votes cast. You then know whether that county can flip the election. In the case of Florida, it was three big dem counties, but the math was sixth grade level.

So the expert commentary has been made obsolete by the web and it's ability to display detailed information faster than pundits can talk.


38 posted on 11/03/2004 8:06:38 AM PST by js1138 (D*mn, I Missed!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson