Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 10/05/2004 9:58:23 AM PDT by havegood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: havegood

Take a look at this thread

http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1235813/posts


2 posted on 10/05/2004 10:00:54 AM PDT by Vermonter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: havegood

Oh, and I caught where I need to add "of" right after "instead".


3 posted on 10/05/2004 10:00:58 AM PDT by havegood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: havegood

Draft Fears Fueled by Inaccurate E-mails

Excerpts:

The bills are not being pushed. It's quite true that the two bills mentioned would require both men and women aged 18 through 25 to perform a two-year period of "national service," which incidentally could be either military or non-military service. But the bills are sponsored only by Democrats, and there's not the slightest evidence that the Bush administration is pushing for them, quietly or otherwise.

One bill is HR 163 , whose principle sponsor is Democratic Rep. Charles Rangel of New York. It has 14 co-sponsors, all of them Democrats in a Congress controlled by Republicans. The bill was dead on arrival: it sits in a House subcommittee with no hearings or votes scheduled and no action expected.

In fact, Rangel told FactCheck.org through his spokesman Emile Milne that even he isn't pushing for passage, let alone Bush (emphasis added):

Rep. Rangel: I'm not pushing this bill . It's up to the President to come to me when he needs it.

The identical Senate bill, S. 89 , introduced by Democratic Sen. Ernest Hollings, and also was DOA. Not one other senator has co-sponsored it. It also sits in committee with no action scheduled or expected.

Both bills in question were drawn up before the Iraq war started, mostly to make a political point. Rangel said he acted to highlight Democratic objections to use of military force against Saddam Hussein. He wrote , "I truly believe that decision-makers who support war would more readily feel the pain of conflict and appreciate the sacrifice of those on the front lines if their children were there, too."

7 posted on 10/05/2004 10:09:12 AM PDT by ravingnutter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: havegood

Don't let the thread police get you down - enthusiasm is our friend. (And some of us may not have seen the earlier posts.) Bump!


8 posted on 10/05/2004 10:11:35 AM PDT by talleyman (The Kerry Sutra - 1001 positions, every one scr*wed...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: havegood

a good search here on FR would have answered your question without even waisting space and bandwidth.


9 posted on 10/05/2004 10:19:31 AM PDT by aft_lizard (I actually voted for John Kerry before I voted against him)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: havegood
Send them the contents of this thread. It's sKerry's MANDATORY National Service plan

Everyone from 13 and up will be forced to 'volunteer' under sKerry's commie plan.

10 posted on 10/05/2004 12:39:02 PM PDT by GailA ( hanoi john, I'm for the death penalty for terrorist, before I impose a moratorium on it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: havegood

You know, I've read about these e-mails on FR, but haven't recieved one yet. I wonder how all you people are getting them? I'm genuinely curious. Is it because you mistakenly gave out your e-mail to the "wrong" type of website? Is it your friends that are sending this?

Just curious.


11 posted on 10/05/2004 12:43:42 PM PDT by FourtySeven (47)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson