Skip to comments.
Battle Between Bubbles Might Have Started Evolution
Howard Hughes Medical Institute via AScribe Newswire ^
| 02 September 2004
| Staff
Posted on 09/03/2004 6:49:50 AM PDT by PatrickHenry
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-122 next last
To see the original article requires a subscription, but
here's a link.
To: VadeRetro; jennyp; Junior; longshadow; RadioAstronomer; Physicist; LogicWings; Doctor Stochastic; ..
Evolution Ping! This list is for the evolution side of evolution threads, and maybe other science topics like cosmology.
See the list's description in my freeper homepage. Then FReepmail me to be added or dropped.
2
posted on
09/03/2004 6:50:58 AM PDT
by
PatrickHenry
(A compassionate evolutionist!)
To: PatrickHenry
THIS is science? May have, might have, etc...
3
posted on
09/03/2004 6:52:22 AM PDT
by
ikka
To: All
"When the scientists mixed the two vesicles, they observed that the ones with sucrose - in which there was greater membrane tension - did, indeed, grow by drawing membrane material from those without sucrose"
Sucrose = sugars. So finally I understand Atkins diet. No sugar, no bloat.
4
posted on
09/03/2004 6:55:15 AM PDT
by
razoroccam
(Then in the name of Allah, they will let loose the Germs of War (http://www.booksurge.com))
To: ikka
To: harrycarey
"fatty bubbles" with genetic materials but no brains...
Oh, you mean Michael Moore....
6
posted on
09/03/2004 6:58:49 AM PDT
by
UncleSamUSA
(the land of the free and the home of the brave)
To: PatrickHenry

Two fatty bubbles?....
7
posted on
09/03/2004 7:03:11 AM PDT
by
Red Badger
(Hillary has a Coke Bottle figure....3 LITER!)
To: UncleSamUSA
Don Ho: Fatty Bubbles.......
8
posted on
09/03/2004 7:04:35 AM PDT
by
Red Badger
(Hillary has a Coke Bottle figure....3 LITER!)
To: PatrickHenry
"Bubbles"? Someone's been staring horizontally at the bottom of their brewsky glass for too long.
9
posted on
09/03/2004 7:05:56 AM PDT
by
azhenfud
("He who is always looking up seldom finds others' lost change...")
To: PatrickHenry
A central question in evolution is how simple versions of these cells, or vesicles, first arose and began the process of competition that drove the evolution of life. God knows......
10
posted on
09/03/2004 7:06:23 AM PDT
by
Red Badger
(Hillary has a Coke Bottle figure....3 LITER!)
To: ikka
Yes that is science. Scientific theories are always qualified like this because at any time, even a theory that has been accepted for hundreds of years can be shown to be incorrect. (Ask Isaac Newton about this, for example). Furthermore, no amount of evidence can prove a scientific theory correct. Science is always speculative to some degree.
11
posted on
09/03/2004 7:07:34 AM PDT
by
stremba
To: ikka
Yes, this is how science works. Theories are proposed, bandied about, gaps are filled in or not. Over time, theses are tested and either supported or abandoned.
The fact that we are seeing the early stages of the process here, with speculation and conjecture, does not diminish the method.
12
posted on
09/03/2004 7:08:38 AM PDT
by
horatio
To: PatrickHenry
"Howard Hughes Medical Institute researchers are proposing that the first battle for survival-of-the-fittest might have played out as a simple physical duel between fatty bubbles stuffed with genetic material"
But war never solved anything
To: ikka
THIS is science? May have, might have, etc...
How about "In the beginning God"
14
posted on
09/03/2004 7:12:54 AM PDT
by
WKB
(3! ~ Psa. 12 8 The wicked freely strut about when what is vile is honored among men.")
To: PatrickHenry
You mean that "Star Trek: The Next Generation" episode was right?
To: PatrickHenry
So what? We still don't know exactly exactly exactly how you get life from non-life. That's proof that there's no way. And even when we think we know a way, we won't have proof. And even if we demonstrate it, all we have demonstrated is Design. Therefore it didn't happen that way.
</You_Can't_Make_Me_See_Mode>
To: PatrickHenry
Forgive my lack of knowledge here. My problem is understanding how, or even why, "bubbles" would, uh, "feel the urge" to compete.
In a strictly mechanistic viewpoint of the universe, why is there any reason for increasing order and complexity than there is for total disorder, entropy and decay after the "Big Bang?"
Why would a very particular chain of organic molecues feel "compelled," or even bother "trying," to reproduce itself? Why would a molecue "care" about "game theory?"
The only "materialist" answer I can imagine is that there is something very "special" about DNA that defies explanation by valances, or chemical and attractive forces.
17
posted on
09/03/2004 7:50:13 AM PDT
by
pollwatcher
(in Memory of the late, great Ted Cassidy (1932-1979) - a Kerry Impersonator well ahead of his time!)
To: PatrickHenry
**
fatty bubbles stuffed with genetic material
**
Anyone want to make a guess as to how in the world these bubbles got stuffed with "genetic" material?
Without Creation there can be no evolution.
Dorks.
18
posted on
09/03/2004 7:51:26 AM PDT
by
four more in O 4
(God Bless George Bush and God Bless YOU.)
To: four more in O 4
So why do so many Christians have this irrational fear of evolution? That never made any sense to me.
Dorks.
19
posted on
09/03/2004 7:54:18 AM PDT
by
horatio
To: VadeRetro
So what? We still don't know exactly exactly exactly how you get life from non-life. Yes. Those Satanic, Darwinite fools know nothing. Nothing at all. They call themselves "scientists" but they are blinded by their faith. Until they can re-create the whole universe in a lab, and then the solar system, and then the entire range of life on earth, and finally man, they haven't shown me anything. And they never will show me anything. Nothing will ever convince me that they know what they're talking about.
</flaming idiot mode>
20
posted on
09/03/2004 7:56:13 AM PDT
by
PatrickHenry
(A compassionate evolutionist!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-122 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson