1 posted on
08/05/2004 10:56:29 AM PDT by
presidio9
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
To: presidio9
It's obvious...I mean, what are the odds that ANOTHER Democrat Party could exist somewheres else?
2 posted on
08/05/2004 10:58:00 AM PDT by
ken5050
(We've looked for WMD in Iraq for LESS time than Hillary looked for the Rose Law firm billing records)
To: presidio9
Jupiter has moons almost as big as Earth. It is possible, but not likely, that these close-in giant gas planets around other stars could have a "moon" that has life on it since the temperature itself may be OK.
3 posted on
08/05/2004 10:59:18 AM PDT by
RockinRight
(Liberalism IS the status quo)
To: presidio9
The universe is just too big for us ever to know, but it is clear that a planet like ours is rare.
To: presidio9
Isn't it harder to observe and detect solar systems like ours at interstellar distances precisely because the planets are so small?
To: presidio9
It's also possible that current technology can ONLY detect planets that are large, therefore gaseous, therefore not sustaining life.
7 posted on
08/05/2004 11:05:58 AM PDT by
Izzy Dunne
(Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
To: presidio9
In an infinite universe there are infinite possibilities.
LBT
-=-=-
8 posted on
08/05/2004 11:08:16 AM PDT by
LiberalBassTurds
(Al Qaeda needs to know we are fluent in the "dialogue of bullets.")
To: presidio9
I'll put this up there with sayings like "The Earth is flat", "Man was never meant to fly", "We'll never harness atomic energy", and "We'll never land on the moon". Such statements are foolish at best...
11 posted on
08/05/2004 11:11:50 AM PDT by
theDentist
("John Kerry changes positions more often than a Nevada prostitute.")
To: presidio9
I have been saying that this for years. In a finite universe someone HAS to be the first. We are here. There is no 'real' evidence of life off of Earth. Anything else is speculation, guessing, and/or just lies. I won't believe there is anything else out there until it comes through the StarGate and says 'HI'
14 posted on
08/05/2004 11:13:42 AM PDT by
Conan the Librarian
(I am a Librarian. I don't know anything....I just know where to look it up.)
To: presidio9
Dear Presidio,
This is a great article and thanks for bringing it to my attention. Kee up the good work.
Signed,
Nobody
17 posted on
08/05/2004 11:14:58 AM PDT by
SerialRants
(http://www.serialrants.com)
To: presidio9
Solar system may be one of a kind...
Then again, it may not.
24 posted on
08/05/2004 11:22:27 AM PDT by
wireman
To: RadioAstronomer; PatrickHenry
26 posted on
08/05/2004 11:24:46 AM PDT by
js1138
(In a minute there is time, for decisions and revisions which a minute will reverse. J Forbes Kerry)
To: presidio9
There is speculation, and then there is dumb speculation.
I am sure that a flea on an elephant thinks there is only one elephant in the universe, too.
33 posted on
08/05/2004 11:35:53 AM PDT by
Publius6961
(I don't do diplomacy either.)
To: KevinDavis
Sping!
34 posted on
08/05/2004 11:36:07 AM PDT by
TomServo
("I'm so upset that I'll binge on a Saltine.")
To: presidio9
What has been seen up to now does not bode well for the main purpose of seeking other planets -- finding life outside our solar system If that's true then why spend billions of dollars trying to find life on other planets?
Why not spend those billions exploring and colonizing our own system and beyond? That's a surer way of finding alien life then sending out expensive probes that almost always fail.
37 posted on
08/05/2004 11:41:30 AM PDT by
Noachian
(Judicial legislation without representation is tyranny)
To: presidio9
Great topic to which I have nothing to offer at this time. So, I'll just get the popcorn and read along. : )
To: RadioAstronomer
45 posted on
08/05/2004 11:59:01 AM PDT by
Boomer Geezer
(God Bless ALL of our military and Vets -- past and present!)
To: presidio9
Of course all the newly discovered solar systems are big gassy planets orbiting close to their stars. Those are the only systems our science can currently detect.
46 posted on
08/05/2004 12:02:16 PM PDT by
doc30
To: presidio9
Sounds kinda dumb. Let's see, we looked at 120 other solar systems. How many trillions of suns are out there? I'd say we would need to study a few hundred million solar systems to come up with the observation that ours is truely unique.
58 posted on
08/05/2004 1:11:50 PM PDT by
taxed2death
(A few billion here, a few trillion there...we're all friends right?)
To: presidio9
Livio and colleagues took a close look at what is known about the other planetary systems that have been discovered. Detectability is in direct proportion to the size/mass of a planet (size for the eclipse method, mass for the wobble method) and in inverse proportion to the planet's orbital period (the longer each orbit takes, the longer you have to watch to detect the eclipses and wobbles). This obviously produces a severe selection effect in the currently available data.
Failure to understand such elementary points is par for the course for the media, but, really, Livio ought to know better.
61 posted on
08/05/2004 1:24:19 PM PDT by
steve-b
(Panties & Leashes Would Look Good On Spammers)
To: presidio9
Solar system may be one of a kind I'll keep an eye out for another one, but I don't recall seeing any others... ;>)
64 posted on
08/05/2004 1:30:39 PM PDT by
HenryLeeII
(sultan88, R.I.P.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson