Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 08/05/2004 10:56:29 AM PDT by presidio9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last
To: presidio9

It's obvious...I mean, what are the odds that ANOTHER Democrat Party could exist somewheres else?


2 posted on 08/05/2004 10:58:00 AM PDT by ken5050 (We've looked for WMD in Iraq for LESS time than Hillary looked for the Rose Law firm billing records)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: presidio9

Jupiter has moons almost as big as Earth. It is possible, but not likely, that these close-in giant gas planets around other stars could have a "moon" that has life on it since the temperature itself may be OK.


3 posted on 08/05/2004 10:59:18 AM PDT by RockinRight (Liberalism IS the status quo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: presidio9

The universe is just too big for us ever to know, but it is clear that a planet like ours is rare.


4 posted on 08/05/2004 10:59:25 AM PDT by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: presidio9

Isn't it harder to observe and detect solar systems like ours at interstellar distances precisely because the planets are so small?


5 posted on 08/05/2004 11:02:45 AM PDT by Pearls Before Swine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: presidio9

It's also possible that current technology can ONLY detect planets that are large, therefore gaseous, therefore not sustaining life.


7 posted on 08/05/2004 11:05:58 AM PDT by Izzy Dunne (Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: presidio9
In an infinite universe there are infinite possibilities.

LBT

-=-=-
8 posted on 08/05/2004 11:08:16 AM PDT by LiberalBassTurds (Al Qaeda needs to know we are fluent in the "dialogue of bullets.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: presidio9

I'll put this up there with sayings like "The Earth is flat", "Man was never meant to fly", "We'll never harness atomic energy", and "We'll never land on the moon". Such statements are foolish at best...


11 posted on 08/05/2004 11:11:50 AM PDT by theDentist ("John Kerry changes positions more often than a Nevada prostitute.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: presidio9

I have been saying that this for years. In a finite universe someone HAS to be the first. We are here. There is no 'real' evidence of life off of Earth. Anything else is speculation, guessing, and/or just lies. I won't believe there is anything else out there until it comes through the StarGate and says 'HI'


14 posted on 08/05/2004 11:13:42 AM PDT by Conan the Librarian (I am a Librarian. I don't know anything....I just know where to look it up.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: presidio9

Dear Presidio,
This is a great article and thanks for bringing it to my attention. Kee up the good work.

Signed,
Nobody


17 posted on 08/05/2004 11:14:58 AM PDT by SerialRants (http://www.serialrants.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: presidio9
Solar system may be one of a kind...

Then again, it may not.

24 posted on 08/05/2004 11:22:27 AM PDT by wireman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RadioAstronomer; PatrickHenry

ping


26 posted on 08/05/2004 11:24:46 AM PDT by js1138 (In a minute there is time, for decisions and revisions which a minute will reverse. J Forbes Kerry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: presidio9
There is speculation, and then there is dumb speculation.
I am sure that a flea on an elephant thinks there is only one elephant in the universe, too.
33 posted on 08/05/2004 11:35:53 AM PDT by Publius6961 (I don't do diplomacy either.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KevinDavis
Sping!
34 posted on 08/05/2004 11:36:07 AM PDT by TomServo ("I'm so upset that I'll binge on a Saltine.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: presidio9
What has been seen up to now does not bode well for the main purpose of seeking other planets -- finding life outside our solar system

If that's true then why spend billions of dollars trying to find life on other planets?

Why not spend those billions exploring and colonizing our own system and beyond? That's a surer way of finding alien life then sending out expensive probes that almost always fail.

37 posted on 08/05/2004 11:41:30 AM PDT by Noachian (Judicial legislation without representation is tyranny)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: presidio9

Great topic to which I have nothing to offer at this time. So, I'll just get the popcorn and read along. : )


41 posted on 08/05/2004 11:49:20 AM PDT by new cruelty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RadioAstronomer

Science PING!


45 posted on 08/05/2004 11:59:01 AM PDT by Boomer Geezer (God Bless ALL of our military and Vets -- past and present!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: presidio9

Of course all the newly discovered solar systems are big gassy planets orbiting close to their stars. Those are the only systems our science can currently detect.


46 posted on 08/05/2004 12:02:16 PM PDT by doc30
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: presidio9

Sounds kinda dumb. Let's see, we looked at 120 other solar systems. How many trillions of suns are out there? I'd say we would need to study a few hundred million solar systems to come up with the observation that ours is truely unique.


58 posted on 08/05/2004 1:11:50 PM PDT by taxed2death (A few billion here, a few trillion there...we're all friends right?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: presidio9
Livio and colleagues took a close look at what is known about the other planetary systems that have been discovered.

Detectability is in direct proportion to the size/mass of a planet (size for the eclipse method, mass for the wobble method) and in inverse proportion to the planet's orbital period (the longer each orbit takes, the longer you have to watch to detect the eclipses and wobbles). This obviously produces a severe selection effect in the currently available data.

Failure to understand such elementary points is par for the course for the media, but, really, Livio ought to know better.

61 posted on 08/05/2004 1:24:19 PM PDT by steve-b (Panties & Leashes Would Look Good On Spammers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: presidio9
Solar system may be one of a kind

I'll keep an eye out for another one, but I don't recall seeing any others... ;>)

64 posted on 08/05/2004 1:30:39 PM PDT by HenryLeeII (sultan88, R.I.P.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson