Besides, a funkle is five posts in a row (not spam posts, neither), so that definitely was NOT four funkles, which woulda been 20 posts.
See? He's slandering your reputation without cause!
On the other hand, is 'funkler' worse than 'spammer'?
"Besides, a funkle is five posts in a row (not spam posts, neither), so that definitely was NOT four funkles, which woulda been 20 posts."
Hmmm--well, you do have a point that it wasn't five posts. However, does the term "funkle" refer only to the complete set of posts in a funkle, or can it also refer to the individual posts within the funkle set? Because in the latter case, for instance, if you had five posts in a row constituting a funkle, each of these posts could also be referred to as a funkle.