Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

?What religion was Hitler?
5-17-04 | Susannah

Posted on 05/17/2004 11:14:22 PM PDT by Susannah

Just curious if Hitler was raised with a particular denomination of religion. And, if so, did his church excommunicate him?


TOPICS: Religion
KEYWORDS: hitlerreligion
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-59 next last
To: razoroccam

So true, so true. Good posts and thanks for the discussion!


Corey


21 posted on 05/18/2004 2:44:44 PM PDT by TheRIGHTChoice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Susannah
A load of liberals, including Canadians (on another forum I've posted at) like to use Hitler's Christianity as one of their examples of why Christianity doesn't mix with politics and has killed more people than other religions.

I guess they've never heard of the 100 million people killed by communism...

On the other hand, Stalin was once an Orthodox seminarian, ao I guess they will blame Christianity for that too...

22 posted on 05/18/2004 7:50:39 PM PDT by LadyDoc (liberals only love politically correct poor people)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: afraidfortherepublic

According to most biographies of AH, he was nominally Catholic, but he embraced paganism as a young adult. He was especially attracted ancient Norse beliefs and subscribed to several pagan publications. He, in private, mocked Christianity as the worship of an "illegitmate Jewish man." Like a comsumate politician, he used Christianity to boost his support. he often peppered his speaches with vague references to "Providence."


23 posted on 05/18/2004 8:40:57 PM PDT by Army Air Corps (Communism failed because people like to own stuff.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: EggsAckley
What are you doing slumming in a forum like that?

It's a good computer help forum with an Off Topic section. All was cordial until the war came up. Now it's mostly a trash Bush and the war in the Off Topic section, but I still go there to watch their "debates" and sometimes add my input. Plus I 'private message' members there that obviously lean to the right and invite them to join freerepublic.

Actually, it's because of the overwhelming liberalism on that forum that I did a google search for conservative forums and landed here at freerepublic. :^)

24 posted on 05/18/2004 10:03:13 PM PDT by Susannah (Have you thanked a soldier lately for your freedom?- www.amillionthanks.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Tribune7

Great link of info! Thank you.


25 posted on 05/18/2004 10:16:44 PM PDT by Susannah (Have you thanked a soldier lately for your freedom?- www.amillionthanks.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: quidnunc
Hitler was enthralled by the operas of Richard Wagner, and he identified with Wagner's heroes such as Siegfried, Parsifal and Lohengrin.

I doubt the identification was very close: two of those heroes are Christian.

26 posted on 05/19/2004 12:58:52 AM PDT by John Locke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: razoroccam
Contrast that to Buddhism - not a single war since Ashoka in 500 BC.

Likewise paganism. No war of religion has ever been fought between pagan societies.

27 posted on 05/19/2004 1:01:51 AM PDT by John Locke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Susannah

I bet that, as a percentage, far more muslims have committed murder in the name of their religion than Christians have. If any liberals give you crap about the crusades, tell them to re-read their history books to discover WHY the crusades were waged. Hint...it was in response to something.


28 posted on 05/19/2004 5:51:23 AM PDT by grellis (Mi sento male. Ho fatto un'indigestione!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: John Locke

You are wrong John. For example, Chengiz Khan's attack on China was a war between two pagan societies. The war's in Latin America (between Aztecs and other post-Mayan civilizations) were also pagan. Try not to think of the world as Europe and North America.


29 posted on 05/19/2004 6:45:51 AM PDT by razoroccam (read Germs of War to know the real armageddon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: John Locke
Likewise paganism. No war of religion has ever been fought between pagan societies.

Pagan societies don't condemn war so it's not a contradiction with their religion. Think of Greece and Rome and Mars. Or look at the wars of the Aztecs to get prisioners to sacrfice to Qu--.

Or the Vikings. Or the Celts.

Pagan societies were very warlike.

30 posted on 05/19/2004 7:29:18 AM PDT by Tribune7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: razoroccam
Contrast that to Buddhism - not a single war since Ashoka in 500 BC (and Buddhism is about 600 years older than Christianity).

Then why did Buddhist Burma sack the capital of Buddhist Siam in 1767?

Don't forget Buddhism is a major influence in Japan which is not know for its pacifism and today the Buddihist majority is fighting the Hindu minority in Sri Lanka.

Even Tibet fought wars.

31 posted on 05/19/2004 7:38:13 AM PDT by Tribune7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Susannah

Hitler was a devotee of the Holy Grail. He stated in Mein Kampf that when he came to the part about accepting Jesus as the messiah he took the opposite (satan) direction. His response was that he would never get on his knees to any Jew.


32 posted on 05/19/2004 8:20:36 AM PDT by marty60
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tribune7

Can't use Japan as an example Tribune. They use Buddhism very selectively. Shinto traditions also play a very powerful role and it was those traditions that drove their imperial ambitions.

I'll research your first point and get back.

Don't agree with your example of Tibet - Tibet fought wars against the Chinese when they were still relatively underdeveloped and like the Mongols, raided the Chinese for quick wealth. Once they accepted Buddhism, they essentially became a peaceful lot.

Also don't accept your Tamil/Sinhalese example in Sri Lanka. That conflict is based on language (Sinhalese versus Tamil), race (Sinhala versus Dravidian), and ethnic origin (ethnic Sri Lankan versus Tamil laborers brought by the British). Religion has almost no role in it.

Even if you were right about your examples, which you are not, they is still a far cry from the atrocities commited under the name of Islam and Christianity.


33 posted on 05/19/2004 8:24:03 AM PDT by razoroccam (read Germs of War to know the real armageddon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: razoroccam
They use Buddhism very selectively.

As opposed to Christianity? :-)

Don't agree with your example of Tibet - Tibet fought wars against the Chinese when they were still relatively underdeveloped and like the Mongols, raided the Chinese for quick wealth. Once they accepted Buddhism, they essentially became a peaceful lot.

A series of kings between the 8th and 10th centuries created a strong kingdom which promoted Buddhism and literacy, and waged succesful wars against both China to the north and the states of India to the south. At times Tibetan rule extended as far south as Bengal and as far north as Mongolia.

Even if you were right about your examples, which you are not, they is still a far cry from the atrocities commited under the name of Islam and Christianity.

There aren't that many Buddhists. When they do get control they are as bad as any group that follows a non-pagan/atheist philosophy.

34 posted on 05/19/2004 10:48:49 AM PDT by Tribune7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: razoroccam
Good points all. However it has been quite a long time, 150+ years or more since a war or purge or anything similar has been conducted in the name of Christianity.

For Islam, I believe you will find it happening today if you look in tomorrows newspaper.

35 posted on 05/19/2004 6:06:39 PM PDT by Khurkris (Ranger On...revenge, grudge, payback...call it what you will. The knives are comin' out.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: razoroccam

A little distorted. The conflict with religion arises from forced suppression. It is not so much the strong community belief favoring one religion as it is the tendency to suppress others. This is not exclusive to belief. Today in America and elsewhere, the suppression is stronger than ever. It's just coming from secular atheists. They are the "my way or the highway" group of the 21st century. Atheism has been just as guilty throughout history as either Islam or Christianity. It's the suppression, not the religion. Faith is actually an important element in freedom as it provides citizens with a basis for self-control.


36 posted on 05/19/2004 8:37:30 PM PDT by The Ghost of FReepers Past (Legislatures are so outdated. If you want real political victory, take your issue to court.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: razoroccam

I should add forced conversion to that. But you can be forced to be an atheist just as easily as anything else. When the American government forbids free expression by labeling it coercive to spectators, then we do not have freedom of religion at all. In the name of free religion we have gay marriage. We have homosexual approval in our public schools. But prayer? The Ten Commandments? Nope. That might offend someone. Don't kid yourself. The same disease you speak of is alive and thriving in our US government. It's just suppressing faith and favoring non-faith.


37 posted on 05/19/2004 8:42:32 PM PDT by The Ghost of FReepers Past (Legislatures are so outdated. If you want real political victory, take your issue to court.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Susannah

While he "claimed" to be Christian, he was very involved in the occults, so he obviously was not.


38 posted on 05/19/2004 11:25:35 PM PDT by ETERNAL WARMING (He is faithful!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grellis

If any liberals give you crap about the crusades, tell them to re-read their history books to discover WHY the crusades were waged.

Indeed. Europeans put up with 450 years of savagery and slashing at the hands of Islam before they finally fought back. (All in the name of conversion, of course.)


39 posted on 05/19/2004 11:29:54 PM PDT by ETERNAL WARMING (He is faithful!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Khurkris

Agree, which is why I said that at least Christians are moving towards Jesus's teachings (thankfully). At the same time, Muslims are moving towards Mohammad's more fundamentalist teachings (unfortunately).


40 posted on 05/20/2004 6:33:38 AM PDT by razoroccam (read Germs of War to know the real armageddon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-59 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson