Message to Mel Gibson's Father

Email | 4/11/2004 | Dan Barash

[yonif]

Bowing to intense pressure from Mel Gibson's father, Jews announced today that they would no longer control the world.

In a press release, Jews stated, "Although we have thoroughly enjoyed the challenges of world domination for the last 3000 years, we feel it's time for gentiles to take control of their own affairs. We plan to spend more time with our families and pursue other interests."

Hutton Gibson stated he was pleased with the announcement, but expressed concern he was losing a scapegoat for all of his problems.

He said he would be launching a search for a new minority group to demonize.

Many Jews expressed relief that they could give up burdensome responsibilities. Retired accountant Jerry Friedman, who controls all media in Montana, said, "I would just as well let the citizens of Montana manage their own TV and newspapers. Don't get me wrong, Montana is a fine state. But it gets awfully cold, and there's nowhere to get a good bagel."

Attorney Allen Franks said he's glad he no longer has to manage Bulgarian monetary policy. "It was getting to be quite a hassle," he said. "I already have a full time job and can't even balance my own checkbook, let alone control the finances of an entire nation."

Homemaker Judith Levine said she would "...miss the hustle and bustle of setting the international price for magnesium every day. But my son is about to become Bar Mitzvah, and oy! Such a party we're gonna have, you wouldn't believe!"

Hollywood producer Sidney Greenbaum was pessimistic about the announcement. "Do you really think goyim know how to make movies?" he asked. "They'll all end up being high budget, technicolor snuff flicks if you leave things up to Mel and his kind."

Comedy experts expressed concern that the business would suffer if Jews suddenly withdrew. According to one insider, "Take away all the Jewish comics and writers, and all you have left is Carrot Top. That's not a world I want to live in."

[yonif]

See #99.

Thanks.

[ladyjane]

This article is directed against the views of the father

Come on now. Can you explain why Mel's name is in the title and not his father's name?

[yonif]

Can you explain why Mel's name is in the title and not his father's name?

For the same reason it is like that when it is talked about relatives of celebrities or important people. It catches people's attention, and people usually know who is being talked about.

Reagan's son talks about his abuse

Lieberman backs Bush's brother in case of comatose woman

Bush's younger brother quizzed over $2m deal (Neil Bush)

[ladyjane]

For the same reason it is like that when it is talked about relatives of celebrities or important people.

The technique is used frequently to discredit the well known person. Your examples illustrate this use very well.

[Tribune7]

The Holocaust was real, but enough has not been said about the Soviet murders of Christians during the Red Terror.

You raise a really good point. Hutton Gibson is a crank who won on Jeopardy then fled to Australia to avoid "the big conflict" where his son became a movie star.

You have people who deny -- not necessarily disbelieve -- the Communist atrocities who are poltical leaders, editors and academics and make policies based on this lie. And unlike Gibson they are lionized in certain "respectable" circles.

[yonif]

True, but by leftists. We rightwingers, do not. So I guess this piece could be used by both in different ways. Even if this guy really did mean to use it against Mel Gibson, we know better.

[Tribune7]

Well, so long ConservativeKnight. Just curious but what kind of troll was he? He actually had me thinking he was quasi-rational.

[Sam Cree]

I had supposed he was rational as well...I didn't see his posts before the zot came and got him, though, the ones that are now removed.

[ApplegateRanch]

It's actually my mother's toy poodle, Amber. She controls the world.

Don't say that where my cat can hear you!

[Ronly Bonly Jones]

Your god requires the tax paid support of the state and inculturation of the unwilling unbelievers in school?>>

What do you think SCHOOL is FOR? (We inculcate unwilling unbelievers in the civic skills such as voting. We inculturate unwilling unbelievers in the overwhelming power of the law. There should be no reason whatsoever why 'unwilling unbelievers,' as you put them, should be able to veto the cultural expressions of willing believers. To do so makes the 'willing believers' subjected to the
inculturation of the unwilling unbelievers, or, in the alternative, the willing believers of a radically different outlook: not Judaism, as you so snidely insinuate, but rather red-diaper socialism (and the pile of human skulls that go with it), for which the 'separation of church and state' (which in its modern use is as different from Jefferson's vision as s--t is from shinola) is the true stalking horse.

Isn't He stronger than requiring pharisaic outward displays of ostensible faith (think of the publican).>>>

It's not he who is weak, but us. Humans NEED cultural support for their beliefs, it's part of our fallen nature. I'd rather have my kids singing "Silent Night" (or the hannukkah equivalent) in choir class than "I Want Your Sex."

[RaginCajunTrad]

"What is there to respect? That guy is dilusional."

Leave this 84-year old man alone for he has no power to do anything about anything.

Why not devote your energies to Bush and Kerry, two misguided men who have the power to do a lot of bad to a lot of people and one already is doing such.