Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Request to intelligent freepers that beleive in evolution - post the name of the species
self ^ | 2004/02/13 | self

Posted on 02/13/2004 3:22:51 AM PST by Truth666

On a previous thread I explained how basically the evolution lie is implanted in the braines the masses : cheap trick behind the most devasting lie in the history of mankind

I'm addressing in this thread freepers with solid knowledge about the flora and fauna that has been documented since photography / film exist. So botanists, zoologists or simply nature interested people that believe in evolution, I have a request to you :

- please post the name of the species and if you have the time a short explanation of why that species would be the best example to illustrate evolution.


TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: prozacchewables
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 181-200 next last
To: Shryke
yep - I posted snake - and truth666 refuses honest engagement on the topic.
121 posted on 02/13/2004 10:11:28 AM PST by Triple (All forms of socialism deny individuals the right to the fruits of their labor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: Tigercap
But there are NO examples of evolution between species - from one to another - that is much different.

Observed instances of speciation.
122 posted on 02/13/2004 10:13:26 AM PST by Dimensio (The only thing you feel when you take a human life is recoil. -- Frank "Earl" Jones)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Ditter
(I hate to be ignored)

Sorry, but that's what happens when you present a fact that a creationist zealot can't handwave away.
123 posted on 02/13/2004 10:14:51 AM PST by Dimensio (The only thing you feel when you take a human life is recoil. -- Frank "Earl" Jones)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Gargantua
Evidence is not proof, it is just evidence. Any "evidence" which contradicts the Bible is proof only of the satanic origin of that evidence.

In other words, you've already dictated to us what the "truth" is and anything that contradicts you -- including observations within reality -- are of evil origin and should be discarded? What an ego you have.

Moreover, you didn't offer evidence that Darwin's wife actually believed that her husband was setting out to disprove God or anything about any gods.
124 posted on 02/13/2004 10:18:04 AM PST by Dimensio (The only thing you feel when you take a human life is recoil. -- Frank "Earl" Jones)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: Modernman
Literalist interpreters of the Bible have done a very good job of turning me off of Christianity.

  To help you back (if you're interested, of course) just remember the following quote - and repeat it often, if necessary. "There is no cause so right that you cannot find an idiot following it."

Drew Garrett

125 posted on 02/13/2004 10:21:54 AM PST by agarrett
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: Shryke
Please, your "example" is clearly faulty and easily refuted. First, you assume (as Truth666 has done) that there are no vestigal features on any organisms. With this assumption, it's easy to understand that the bones that you have pointed out cannot be vestigal, because no vestigal parts exist!

I think that I'm getting the hang of this creationist logic.
126 posted on 02/13/2004 10:26:18 AM PST by Dimensio (The only thing you feel when you take a human life is recoil. -- Frank "Earl" Jones)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: Gargantua
Any "evidence" which contradicts the Bible is proof only of the satanic origin of that evidence.

Nonsense. In fact, it's double nonsense:

First, where does evolution contradict the bible? If you are going to bring up abiogenesis, don't bother, that's not part of Evolution. I'll repeat, it's not part of Evolution.

Second, tell me where the Bible says everything not agreeing with it is Satanic in origin?

127 posted on 02/13/2004 10:27:42 AM PST by Shryke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: Truth666
your question is akin to asking which house built in the last 3.2 seconds best represents the late neo-classic georgian style of architecture, only it's more vague.

Your response , i presume, would be something like "Nope- built 5 seconds ago, doesn't count! neener neener neener!"
128 posted on 02/13/2004 10:32:32 AM PST by Fierce Allegiance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #129 Removed by Moderator

To: Dimensio
I think that I'm getting the hang of this creationist logic.

Yes. In fact, I am going to apply that same mindest (HEY! I'LL USE A CREATIONIST WORD! WORLDVIEW!), I mean worldview, to all my debates with literal creationists. Want to hear it in action?

Creationist: No Shryke, the Bible says (blah)(blah).

Shryke: There is no Bible. What are you talking about?

Creationist: I quoting the book of Genesis!

Shryke: No you're not.

Creationist: Read it! Page 1!!

Shryke: This is silly. How can I read a chapter that doesn't exist?

Ad infinitum.

130 posted on 02/13/2004 10:34:29 AM PST by Shryke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: Truth666
Request to intelligent freepers that beleive in evolution - post the name of the species

Snicker.

131 posted on 02/13/2004 10:35:31 AM PST by biblewonk (I must try to answer all bible questions.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Truth666
---"IMO, 'global warming' and 'Darwinism' are in the same boat: there is not enough data to support either theory. "
You should not put evolution theory and global warming in the same boat. "Global warming" isn't the real issue anyway, it's climate change. But again that is not in the context of this thread.---

no, but it's a nice demonstration that you can take a couple of words out of context of any theory and make it seem ridiculous.
132 posted on 02/13/2004 10:46:36 AM PST by plastic_positive
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Modernman
"Why would it not be proof? If we were talking in terms of a court of law, such proof is considered just as good as if somebody actually saw you breaking the window."

Really?

What about the thousands of other people out there wearing exactly the same sneaker as me? What is it that makes it impossible for one of them to have broken that window?

Both your rushing to judgement, and your inability to consider alternate possibilities, are patently obvious, and are without a doubt a large part of how you shape your flawed opinions.

Thank you for clarifying for us your limitations.

133 posted on 02/13/2004 10:59:39 AM PST by Gargantua (Choose this day Whom you will serve.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: Gargantua
What about the thousands of other people out there wearing exactly the same sneaker as me? What is it that makes it impossible for one of them to have broken that window?

The more you drag this out, the less analagous it is to the evidence for evolution. You're only hurting your case here.
134 posted on 02/13/2004 11:04:31 AM PST by Dimensio (The only thing you feel when you take a human life is recoil. -- Frank "Earl" Jones)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: Dimensio; Shryke; Modernman
"In other words, you've already dictated to us what the "truth" is...."

No, I haven't. God did, in His Bible.

If you God/Bible haters could only see how foolish and pathetic you look to anyone whose eyes are not scaled over with the pus of sin, you would be ashamed for publicly behaving as you do.

That you cannot see this, or feel any shame for the public ignorance of your stated positions, is itself both telling and quite sad.

135 posted on 02/13/2004 11:08:20 AM PST by Gargantua (Choose this day Whom you will serve.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

Comment #136 Removed by Moderator

To: Gargantua
What about the thousands of other people out there wearing exactly the same sneaker as me?

In your original post, you said that the sneaker-prints "matched" your sneakers. To me, that means more than simply the same sneakers- it means forensic evidence can match the print to your shoe. Shoe-prints can be as distinctive as finger-prints.

The greater point stands up, though: circumstantial evidence is no better or worse than direct evidence.

Both your rushing to judgement, and your inability to consider alternate possibilities, are patently obvious, and are without a doubt a large part of how you shape your flawed opinions.

Your moving of the goalposts is typical of creationist arguments.

137 posted on 02/13/2004 11:12:29 AM PST by Modernman ("When you want to fool the world, tell the truth." -Otto von Bismarck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: Gargantua
No, I haven't. God did, in His Bible.

That's your conclusion based on your belief. If you want to prove that the Bible is the "truth" you cannot do so based on the argument that "the Bible says so."

If you God/Bible haters could only see how foolish and pathetic you look to anyone whose eyes are not scaled over with the pus of sin,

Disagreeing with you is not a sin, as much as you would like it to be. Your arrogance is stunning.

138 posted on 02/13/2004 11:15:52 AM PST by Modernman ("When you want to fool the world, tell the truth." -Otto von Bismarck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

Comment #139 Removed by Moderator

To: Gargantua
If you God/Bible haters could only see how foolish and pathetic you look to anyone whose eyes are not scaled over with the pus of sin, you would be ashamed for publicly behaving as you do

I don't hate the bible at all, and I've read most of it. Do you normally cast aspersions at people you know nothing about? Have you been appointed my judge by someone in command? Is THAT what you have gained by your so-called "fundamental" religious beliefs? The ability to condemn the innocent?

As usual, it is those claiming to be "more religious" acting completely against their beliefs.

You also decided not to answer/debate my questions. Why post here at all if you just wish to mislabel the posters and twist the facts?

140 posted on 02/13/2004 11:18:46 AM PST by Shryke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 181-200 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson