To: yankeedame
"So if there are any autocrats at the breakfast table, I would sincerely like to hear your thoughts on this."
Maybe your "autocrats" are at Church?
2 posted on
02/08/2004 5:58:42 AM PST by
Ff--150
(OutYourBellyLivingWaters)
To: yankeedame
My reply would be two fold. First, to a believer, there is no salvation in rejecting Jesus. Second, it provides no framework for moral behavior
3 posted on
02/08/2004 5:59:58 AM PST by
doodad
To: yankeedame
It is wrong for the reason stated in the dictionary, i.e., not worshiping the true God. The First Commandment of God clearly states that "You shall have no other God before Me". If you have no religion then all religions are equally false, and so is paganism, since it a form of pseudo-mystic religion.
Just between you and me, I think most pagans are liberals, too.
To: yankeedame
So if there are any autocrats at the breakfast table, I would sincerely like to hear your thoughts on this.
Would a sleep-deprived "CEO of the Sofa" (*nods to PJ O'Rourke*) suffice?
8 posted on
02/08/2004 6:12:35 AM PST by
KangarooJacqui
(Deliver us from evil... vote Conservative.)
To: yankeedame
Of course "Scripture is might small coin with" pagans, just as quoting Wiccan belief is mighty small coin to Christians, Muslims, Jews and other more accepted religions throughout the world. Yankee Dame, I really believe this is one of those "no-win" situations: You will never convince any side that any of the others have an abiding validity.
9 posted on
02/08/2004 6:31:29 AM PST by
NCPAC
To: yankeedame
Why is neo-paganism (Wicca, et. al) wrong? Wrong about what?
14 posted on
02/08/2004 2:14:34 PM PST by
balrog666
(Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the universe.)
To: yankeedame
15 posted on
02/09/2004 12:30:07 PM PST by
Starter
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson