At least that's what he said last year! What a joke!
To: SoCal Pubbie
#1

2 posted on
12/08/2003 2:11:47 PM PST by
PRND21
To: SoCal Pubbie
Stoops suggested possibly an eight-team playoff that would involve seven BCS bowl games, with the championship game being rotated among those bowls. Or perhaps just rotating it among four BCS bowls. Bump for me .. I've been saying that same thing for 3 years!
Quotes originally published 11-06-2002
4 posted on
12/08/2003 2:15:07 PM PST by
BlueNgold
(Feed the Tree .....)
To: SoCal Pubbie
You're not suggesting that we leave the "formula" up to Bob Stoops, are you?
5 posted on
12/08/2003 2:16:18 PM PST by
squidly
To: SoCal Pubbie; 4ConservativeJustices
Bump for the Sooners--from a homeboy=-)
6 posted on
12/08/2003 2:19:04 PM PST by
Ff--150
(that we through His poverty might be rich)
To: SoCal Pubbie
Did you see the BCS show yesterday?
Each school had its head coach available for comments.
But not Oklahoma.
Ok didn't even have its OC or DC available. Only an "Assistant Defensive Coordinator".
I guess the others didn't want to show their faces.
7 posted on
12/08/2003 2:20:09 PM PST by
Shermy
To: SoCal Pubbie
I'm impartial... from what I have seen though, LSU should be ranked #1, and the title game should be LSU-USC. After the way Oklahoma played against Kansas State, I don't see how they have any claim to be the national champion.
10 posted on
12/08/2003 2:22:58 PM PST by
thoughtomator
(The U.N. is a terrorist organization)
To: SoCal Pubbie
Excellent find. I am already sick of the barefoot Sooner apologists and their convoluted whining about how they deserve to still go the mythical championship game.
12 posted on
12/08/2003 2:25:48 PM PST by
Diddle E. Squat
(www.firethebcs.com, www.weneedaplayoff.com, www.firemackbrown.com, www.firecarlreese.com)
To: SoCal Pubbie
I'd suggest USC concentrate on beating Michigan. If I was Michigan I know I'd be getting tired of all this we're the real NC's talk from USC. BTW, I believe USC has a split NC...'78 I believe
To: SoCal Pubbie
Yep, kinda silly for a team that just lost the Big 12 championship to play for the national championship in it's next game.
To: SoCal Pubbie
What is he going to do, refuse the bid, the school would have his hide.
To: SoCal Pubbie
"Some of it (the BCS) makes sense and is good. Other parts of it don't make sense, and it's bad."GIGO
29 posted on
12/08/2003 3:04:43 PM PST by
genew
To: SoCal Pubbie
I guess if not winning your conference rules out NC's, then we need to do away with the at large bids for the the BB championships. We lost one game to a good team on a neutral field. Why is everyone hammering us? We didn't write the rules.
To: SoCal Pubbie
GO BOISE STATE!!!!! GO BRONCOS!!!!
43 posted on
12/08/2003 3:30:53 PM PST by
IYAS9YAS
(Go Fast, Turn Left!)
To: SoCal Pubbie
The fault lies with the teams that put themselves at the mercy of the BCS by losing a game, even just one.
Statwise, LSU and OU were the better teams this year:
Offensive Averages (per game)
OU 45.2 points, 461.4 yards
USC 42.2 points, 450.7 yards
LSU 34.9 points, 426.5 yards
Defensive Averages (per game allowed)
LSU 10.8 points, 259.5 yards
OU 14.8 points, 255.6 yards
USC 18.8 points, 337.8 yards
Colgate should be National Champs!!! (pbbbbbbbt!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson