Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hegseth made the fitness test harder for women in combat roles. Most female Marines are passing.
The 19th ^ | September 17, 2026 | Sonner Kehrt, The War Horse

Posted on 09/18/2026 7:47:13 AM PDT by fwdude

When Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth summoned hundreds of generals and admirals from around the world to Quantico, Virginia, last September, he delivered a blunt message: Things were changing fast in the newly renamed Department of War.

...

What mattered going forward, Hegseth said, were standards.

“I don’t want my son serving alongside troops who are out of shape or in combat [units] with females who can’t meet the same combat arms physical standards as men,” he said.

The same day, Hegseth signed a directive requiring sex-neutral fitness standards for all troops in combat roles. The service began implementing the new standards earlier this year.

(Excerpt) Read more at 19thnews.org ...


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS:

Click here: to donate by Credit Card

Or here: to donate by PayPal

Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794

Thank you very much and God bless you.


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-94 next last
"Hegseth made the fitness test harder for women..."

In other words, he applied the same standards for men to women.

1 posted on 09/18/2026 7:47:13 AM PDT by fwdude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: fwdude

If the girls can keep up with the men, then the standards can be raised.


2 posted on 09/18/2026 7:51:15 AM PDT by ansel12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fwdude

What most people don’t realize is that standards for everyone have been softening for decades. This softening has a direct correlation to women increasingly getting into combat roles.


3 posted on 09/18/2026 7:51:53 AM PDT by fwdude (Why is there a "far/radical right," but damned if they'll admit that there is a far/radical left)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fwdude

Feminazis don’t want to admit that men and women are different, collectively. But they want special privileges based on those differences. They want it both ways.


4 posted on 09/18/2026 7:53:32 AM PDT by I want the USA back (Blue Lives Matter! White lives matter. Remember Iryna Zarutska and Justine Damond.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fwdude

HEGSETH IS CORRECT


5 posted on 09/18/2026 7:56:09 AM PDT by ridesthemiles (not giving up on TRUMP---EVER)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

Keep raising the standards until the girls can’t.


6 posted on 09/18/2026 7:58:02 AM PDT by libh8er
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: fwdude

So, what is the problem?


7 posted on 09/18/2026 7:58:15 AM PDT by Fido969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fwdude

Pete must have raised standards by a token amount.


8 posted on 09/18/2026 7:59:50 AM PDT by libh8er
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fwdude

For this, Tillis wants to impeach him................


9 posted on 09/18/2026 8:02:23 AM PDT by Red Badger (Iryna Zarutska, May 22, 2002 Kyiv, Ukraine – August 22, 2025 Charlotte, North Carolina Say her name)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: libh8er

Have you thought that through? According to the article 91.38% of women and 96.53% of men in combat arms who have taken the test since January have met or exceeded the new standards. If standards are raised till all women fail lots of men will fail also. You’ll probably end up with a seriously depleted Marine Corps.


10 posted on 09/18/2026 8:03:49 AM PDT by MoraBlack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: libh8er
Pete must have raised standards by a token amount.

He said they must pass the same standards as the men.
So the standards must have been lowered overall in the past.

11 posted on 09/18/2026 8:03:50 AM PDT by TangoLimaSierra (I)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: I want the USA back

And you can’t criticize them that is sexist or misogynistic.


12 posted on 09/18/2026 8:04:01 AM PDT by Resolute Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: fwdude

It is easier than that, no women in a combat role.


13 posted on 09/18/2026 8:04:30 AM PDT by Resolute Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fwdude

I dont want my son in combat with women around. Males are males and split tails are split tails. Patriarchal roles of male protector can not be just ignored by either sex.

IYKYK


14 posted on 09/18/2026 8:04:38 AM PDT by Delta 21 (None of us are descendants of fearful men!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fwdude

“Most female Marines are passing.”

I guess “passing” can be defined a couple of ways.


15 posted on 09/18/2026 8:05:13 AM PDT by MayflowerMadam (In the end, we will remember not the words of our enemies, but the silence of our friends.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fwdude

The phrase “female Marine” should not exist.


16 posted on 09/18/2026 8:05:14 AM PDT by Bigg Red (Deus vult!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fwdude

There is no role for women in the Marine Corps. None.


17 posted on 09/18/2026 8:07:17 AM PDT by ComputerGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fwdude

Amen to him.

Ideology meets reality on the battlefield. Pete points to exactly the core problem - this isn’t about “equality”, it’s not about “equal rights and the advancement of women” - it’s about the DANGER THE MEN ALONGSIDE THEM are supposed to accept and is IRRESPONSIBLE to the women they claim to be cheering for. It’s an unfair proposition, accomplishing nothing but putting everyone’s lives in danger. War doesn’t give a damn about “women’s equality”. It is the ultimate arbiter of reality.

The only thing low standards will achieve is higher rates of dead soldiers.


18 posted on 09/18/2026 8:07:31 AM PDT by fuzzylogic (welfare state = sharing of poor moral choices among everybody)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fwdude

Yay!

The key test is: Can the soldier throw their wounded buddy over their shoulder and run from the battle to the field medic?

If “Yes”, they’re good to go.


19 posted on 09/18/2026 8:08:59 AM PDT by Uncle Miltie (When your Supreme Leader is easily whacked by Jews, reconsider how Akhbar your Allah is!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: libh8er

Exactly, and for those who don’t know why, GIs need bench depth, they need to have so much reserve male strength and endurance that after a year of sweltering jungle, poor food, and bouts of dysentery and malaria they can still defeat enemy paratroopers.

The same in any climate, in a long and sustained war against a peer military, things are going to be bad, and someone who can only meet the lower standards while eating well and working out in the gym, and sleeping well between clean sheets in between testing and who suffers injuries and pelvic fractures even during those ideal conditions doesn’t have the deep reserves and durability under field conditions that the male body and psyche has.


20 posted on 09/18/2026 8:11:18 AM PDT by ansel12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-94 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson