Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

One Justice Found to Be the “Most Partisan” on Supreme Court
The Liberty Daily ^ | July 14, 2026 | Bob Unruh

Posted on 07/14/2026 9:09:38 PM PDT by Red Badger

There’s one justice on the U.S. Supreme Court who has been determined to be the most partisan of all, pushing a political agenda – against President Donald Trump – in 98 out of 100 cases.

The conclusion comes from a report in the Federalist about an analysis released to some readers by the Wall Street Journal.

That found Ketanji Jackson voted against President Trump’s plans and agendas in 98 out of 100 major cases.

Those often wrongly accused of being partisan – for President Trump – aligned with his arguments 89% (Samuel Alito) and 88% (Clarence Thomas) of the time.

The Journal, according to the report suggested, “Alito’s record was the real story behind this data.” It found, “In a term dominated by Trump-related disputes, [Alito] voted to uphold every significant Trump initiative that came before the court, and he wrote frequent, full-throated endorsements of some of Trump’s most brazen efforts to expand presidential power.”

But the “real story” from the data compiled in the analysis is that Jackson is so radical that it “sometimes even causes her to split with her left-wing counterparts on the court.”

In fact, Jackson several times has been the lone dissenter in an otherwise unanimous court, pushing extreme leftism on issue after issue.

For example, the Federalist reported, “in Chiles v. Salazar earlier this year, the Supreme Court ruled that Colorado cannot ban therapists from offering patients alternatives to pursuing radical ‘transgender’ ideology.”

The 8-1 majority including liberals Elena Kagan and Sonia Sotomayor found Colorado’s often-appearing battle against Christians and their beliefs was violating therapists’ right to free speech.

Jackson wanted to give the state the authority to mandate its state-adopted beliefs for counselors to adopt, or else.

Jackson also was flying solo when the high court voted to hand down its decision regarding redistricting in Louisiana right away.

The New York Times has noted that Jackson is causing “worry” among the other liberals on the bench, Sotomayor and Kagan, because of her extreme statements and whether they will “dilute” the leftist influences there.

A commentary posted at Conservative News Daily said, “She is characterized as highly candid and sometimes conflict-prone, frequently enough authoring her own dissents, which has attracted criticism from fellow liberals. The analysis underscores the heightened partisanship and tension surrounding the court, with threats of violence and protests targeting justices following controversial decisions and leaks. Despite her claims of impartiality, Jackson’s voting record appears highly partisan, contrasting with her accusations against originalist justices of bias.”

The actual threats against the Supreme Court mostly have been from leftist ideologues. Sen. Chuck Schumer, for example, enraged over the court’s decisions, threatened, “I want to tell you, Gorsuch, I want to tell you, Kavanaugh, you have released the whirlwind and you will pay the price. You won’t know what hit you if you go forward with these awful decisions.”

In 2022 a man showed up at Justice Brett Kavanaugh's home with plans to murder him, and protesters demanding their leftist agenda have appeared at the homes of other justices, including Amy Barrett.


TOPICS: Government; History; Politics; Society
KEYWORDS:

Click here: to donate by Credit Card

Or here: to donate by PayPal

Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794

Thank you very much and God bless you.

...This is what passes for a SUPREME COURT JUSTICE...................
1 posted on 07/14/2026 9:09:38 PM PDT by Red Badger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

I imagine that if we are lucky to still be a nation in a couple centuries we will look back at the decisions we made like SCOTUS appointees based on skin color and sex regardless of how idiotic they where and laugh at how stupid we were to appoint them.


2 posted on 07/14/2026 9:15:21 PM PDT by TonyM (Score Event)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

She certainly does not impress ME!


3 posted on 07/14/2026 9:22:16 PM PDT by EinNYC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EinNYC

She has to be the stupidest person ever to sit on the Supreme Court........................


4 posted on 07/14/2026 9:29:11 PM PDT by Red Badger (Iryna Zarutska, May 22, 2002 Kyiv, Ukraine – August 22, 2025 Charlotte, North Carolina Say her name)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

That’s probably because she’s the least qualified to be on the Supreme Court.


5 posted on 07/14/2026 9:37:53 PM PDT by econjack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Jackson is an absolute disaster, easily the worst SC justice of my lifetime - and she got three Republican confirmation votes in the Senate.


6 posted on 07/14/2026 9:43:48 PM PDT by AnotherUnixGeek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AnotherUnixGeek

“and she got three Republican confirmation votes in the Senate”

Let me guess:
Collins
Murkowski
?
Oh yeah, Romney


7 posted on 07/14/2026 9:47:25 PM PDT by doorgunner69
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

I think you are correct. She is a dimwit, racist, DEI ideologue.


8 posted on 07/14/2026 10:02:04 PM PDT by rlmorel (Factio Communistica Sinensis Delenda Est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

That means she was an excellent choice by the Dems. She is doing her job 98% of the time.


9 posted on 07/14/2026 10:06:57 PM PDT by nwrep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
SCOTUS hears so few cases that it allows some real travesties of justice by the appellate courts to stand uncorrected. A justice at SCOTUS could write some interesting dissents on why SCOTUS refused to grant certiorari, vacate and remand to correct the so called "errors" below. Jackson has yet to write anything with which I can agree.
10 posted on 07/14/2026 10:36:47 PM PDT by Dr. Franklin ("A republic, if you can keep it." )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Arthur Wildfire! March; Berosus; Bockscar; BraveMan; cardinal4; ...

11 posted on 07/14/2026 11:24:49 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (The Demagogic Party is just a collection of violent, rival street gangs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson