“Argues”??
Posted on 06/15/2026 11:21:48 AM PDT by SmokingJoe
Summary of the YouTube video: "Liberal Tech Bros STUNNED After BOMBSHELL Data Map Exposes How Democrats RIGGED LA Mayor Election!" by Black Conservative Perspective.
The video analyzes a segment from the All-In Podcast (tech/finance hosts) reacting to voting data from the Los Angeles mayoral election. The creator frames it as evidence of systemic Democratic election rigging in California, especially via mail-in ballots and homeless populations.
Key Points from the Video:
Voting Data Breakdown: In-person Election Day votes favored Spencer Pratt (35%), Karen Bass (29%), Nithya Raman (26%). Pre-Election Day mail-ins: Bass led strongly. Post-Election Day/late mail-ins showed big shifts, with Raman gaining significantly (up ~80% in some comparisons) and Pratt dropping sharply. The hosts highlight this as statistically suspicious.
Geographic "Bombshell" Map: Incremental votes for Nithya Raman concentrated heavily around Skid Row (known for large homeless population). The podcast hosts and video creator link this to reported practices of ballot harvesting and paying homeless individuals for votes. Fraud Allegations:
The video argues California's universal mail-in ballot system, lack of strict ID/signature verification, chain-of-custody issues, and postmark rules create massive loopholes.
It references broader California fraud (Medicaid, unemployment, etc.) and claims similar exploitation occurs in elections. Clips from Skid Row residents describe being paid small amounts ($2–$5) to sign ballots, with instructions on who to vote for (e.g., Karen Bass), multiple ballots at once, and pressure tactics.dde068 Podcast Reaction: The "liberal tech bros" express shock ("Wow") at the data and patterns, with sarcastic Matrix references ("There is no election... appointed representatives") implying the system is rigged or broken.
Broader Context: Mentions ongoing investigations into voter fraud by a U.S. Attorney and civil lawsuits. The creator portrays this as confirmation of how Democrats maintain power through paid votes and harvesting.
The video is opinionated and partisan, presenting the data and clips as strong evidence of fraud while criticizing California's election system. It runs through the podcast discussion with commentary.
Dear FRiends,
We need your continuing support to keep FR funded. Your donations are our sole source of funding. No sugar daddies, no advertisers, no paid memberships, no commercial sales, no gimmicks, no tax subsidies. No spam, no pop-ups, no ad trackers.
If you enjoy using FR and agree it's a worthwhile endeavor, please consider making a contribution today:
Click here: to donate by Credit Card
Or here: to donate by PayPal
Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794
Thank you very much and God bless you,
Jim
Ping
What are the postmark rules?
It’s not “voter fraud;” it’s registration, ballot. and counting fraud.
Trump should swoop in with a messive FBI force
The postmark rules are almost a joke. The “voter” can WRITE A DATE on the ballot, and that’s enough. And more silliness.
“Argues”??
“What are the postmark rules?”
There used to be a postmark on every piece of mail I got. Now it is hit or miss. Mostly miss.
Two important observations:
1. We republicans are pretty good at pointing out the fraud and the many ways of fraud, but always after the fact.
2. Even after pointing out the fraud with great evidence, we always look to the future elections for clamping down on the fraud,
Then, we go thru the 2- point cycle, with the same results every election or year.
A third point, which is obvious, is that nothing will ever be done about the fraud.
We might as well be pointing out the massive fraud in China where the communist party always ‘seems’ to win every election.
California and other major fraud areas, might as well be little Chinas.
But, lets’ talk about the fraud some more... we talk a good game, but always end up losing the game.
They need around maybe 100,000 of those “voters”, except that dems never talk about voters, but ballots.
so even $2-$5 times those ballots and you talking real money.
They may not afford it if they paid like $50/ballot.
Idea: Dems like to regulate!
Maybe legislate minimum price for ballot, so those poor souls on the streets get their fair share!
Ohio changed its law to require the ballot be postmarked before election day and arrive by election day to prevent this.
No one is “stunned” at this
And, not a thing wil be done about it.
The fix is always in, and always sticks.
Bkmk
A lot is already being done about it.
People will go to jail.
One black woman who has been buying votes from homeless on Skid Row has already been tried and jailed.
STUNNED? You say?
BOMBSHELL? You say?
SUN WILL RISE IN THE EAST TOMORROW MORNING? You say?
My flabbers are completely ghasted! SHOCKED! am I.
without post marks, what is top keep you from reusing stamps ?
“without post marks, what is top keep you from reusing stamps ?”
Because I send a letter about once a quarter. They’re dirt cheap. I’m lazy. (Let me see...cheap, lazy...I think that covers it.)
Forget it Jake, it’s Los Angeles
I am reminded of an old Ace Reid “COWBOYS” cartoon from 60 years ago.
A news paper reporter asks an illegal alien if there was discrimination at the polls.
The answer...”SI! There is discrimination at the polls! I voted seven times and he only paid me for three!”
In the background is a politician handing out $ for votes.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.