Click here: to donate by Credit Card
Or here: to donate by PayPal
Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794
Thank you very much and God bless you.
Posted on 06/02/2026 11:45:17 AM PDT by nickcarraway
Two proposed bills threaten to worsen pregnancy outcomes and increase intimate partner violence
She stays quiet because of her child, my patient tells me. But despite her passivity, her husband always manages to find something wrong with her. He shouts at ungodly volumes, threatening, "Don't make me do something to you that I'll regret!" Another time, "You're making me angry enough to hit you!" She invariably cowers in terror, shielding the child from him.
"Like a switch, he shuts it off and turns to our son, smiling, comforting him, even when he's just threatened me. I don't understand it," she weeps in my office. "How can he lose control one minute at me, and then be so calm the next?"
"Because he doesn't lose control," I reply. "He knows precisely what he is doing." I show her the Power and Control Wheel, a useful tool in the psychiatry clinic for identifying behaviors consistent with coercive control, and tears pour down her face. "This is my life, and I can't keep going like this."
The couple has been trying for another child for 2 years, and she's suffered repeated miscarriages with little respite in between. The last attempt ended in ectopic pregnancy and emergent salpingectomy (removal of a fallopian tube). She almost died. With these recent revelations of her husband's cruelty, I wonder if she truly wanted to be pregnant again, if "no," was ever really an option for her.
Pregnancy is a known risk factor for escalating intimate partner abuse. Simultaneously a tool of control by an abuser and a narcissistic injury to the abuser -- it represents a shift in the victim's focus from the abuser to the pregnancy and therefore a perceived rejection -- it has potentially lethal consequences for victims, with homicide, most often with a firearm, as the leading cause of maternal mortality in the U.S.
Reproductive coercion is inextricably linked to domestic violence, and indeed the erosion of reproductive rights post-Roe has highlighted that dangerous public health association. Abortion restrictions enacted in "trigger-ban" states after Dobbs were found to significantly increase rates of intimate partner violence for reproductive-age women and predicted to add an estimated $1.2 billion in social costs. The evidence is clear. These restrictions are expensive, draconian, and overtly dangerous for patients.
Within the last month, two alarming developments in the "pro-life" fight illustrate the increasing cruelty within the movement, putting women at increased risk of health complications both from pregnancy and intimate partner violence.
Proposed Ban on Dilation and Evacuation
House Republicans proposed a federal ban on dilation and evacuation, a common abortion method in the second trimester and an important component of miscarriage care. The legislation states that efforts to save the life of the mother are exempt, but we know from experience that such exceptions are often ineffective, as the threat of criminal consequences invariably has a chilling effect on doctors' and hospital lawyers' willingness to act to save the mother.
The leading champion of the ban is Rep. Kat Cammack (R-Fla.), whose own reproductive care for a life-threatening ectopic pregnancy was thrown into chaos under Florida's abortion restrictions, which confused doctors and caused them to delay her care.
You'd think such a harrowing experience, variants of which have brutally killed other women, would inspire empathy and thoughtfulness around healthcare legislation. You'd think Cammack would have developed a personal appreciation of the fact that miscarriage care overlaps heavily with abortion management (other lawmakers have demonstrated their ignorance here) and that blanket bans on medical care that threaten doctors serve no one.
Yet, Cammack continues the same trend of uninformed and bullish legislation, which will have consequences for patients like her who emergently need miscarriage care.
Codifying Personhood and Defining Abortion as Murder
A controversial North Carolina bill introduced by Republican Representatives codifies fetal personhood and defines abortion as murder. It legally condones use of force, even lethal, to defend the life of another, under the definition of life delineated by fetal personhood.
Need I say more about how abjectly cruel this bill is? In practice, it would likely encourage threats against clinics providing comprehensive reproductive healthcare and condone vigilante killings of doctors and pregnant women. It also puts women at increased risk of violence or even death if they try to take control of their reproductive choices in the context of intimate partner violence.
What if a woman with an abusive partner tries to obtain an elective abortion because she's trying to escape her abuser? Would the abuser be justified in holding her against her will? Or even restraining or attacking her to "defend the life" of the fetus? And don't deflect by telling me she should have "just chosen a better man" or "didn't have to spread her legs" (I have heard both things). Abusers rarely reveal themselves until it's too late, and women in abusive relationships often don't have a choice about when they engage in sexual activity.
These seem like absurd hypotheticals, but the post-Roe era with its very real ramifications that have demonstrably endangered the lives of women and girls nationwide compels us to ask these questions. I remember my own conservative family claiming that the dreaded Left was "fearmongering" and overreacting when concerns about criminalizing miscarriage were raised years ago. Those concerns were not overreactions; they have become reality in today's America.
Limiting Reproductive Rights Isn't Really "Pro-Life"
Whom exactly is this movement protecting? Pro-lifers will say, "the life of the unborn," but is an abusive man who would restrain or beat the mother of his child a protective figure for a child? Is a fertilized egg implanted in a fallopian tube that will likely rupture a life that can be saved? Should miscarriage tissue remain stuck in a woman's uterus because the procedure needed to remove it safely is ignorantly deemed barbaric?
Let's not pretend that all measures limiting reproductive rights are "pro-life." It is absolutely possible to be pro-life and decent: promoting social infrastructure that can support women (paid leave, education access, affordable childcare); combating community violence in part by holding abusers accountable for their actions; and widespread investment in meeting our society's basic needs, including housing, food access, and healthcare.
The current brand of the pro-life movement is cruelty, and now, it is overtly legitimizing violence against women and healthcare providers.
We live in a time when evidence is casually disregarded, scientific nuance is dismissed, education is devalued, shock and outrage garner more attention than facts, and consequences are negotiable. Bluntly, it is transforming us into an increasingly stupid and cruel population.
This is not political commentary. It comes across as such because the issue of reproductive rights has become so partisan. But even Republican lawmakers are appalled at the extreme reach of this disconcertingly cruel movement that apparently promises to defend life, no matter how many women are terrorized or killed in the process. Some are deeply regretful of the laws they have championed, now appreciating their human toll. More courageous voices like theirs are desperately needed. Decency belongs to no specific political side.
These legislative measures are without a doubt indecent and it is incumbent upon us to follow the evidence, common sense, and our compassion to protect our patients. This is madness, and it needs to stop.
|
|
Click here: to donate by Credit Card Or here: to donate by PayPal Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794 Thank you very much and God bless you. |
Ping
There is a cruel person in the article and it’s not any pro-lifer.
Liberals are positively satanic. The epitome of evil and sin.
Need I say more about how abjectly cruel this bill is? In practice, it would likely encourage threats against clinics providing comprehensive reproductive healthcare and condone vigilante killings of doctors and pregnant women.It also puts women at increased risk of violence or even death if they try to take control of their reproductive choices in the context of intimate partner violence.
We need to address the real problem.
Some women are attracted to the “bad guy”. He is “exciting”.
Meanwhile many “good guys” are single and can’t find a date, let alone a wife because they are “boring”. All they do is work and provide food and shelter.
“We live in a time when evidence is casually disregarded, scientific nuance is dismissed, education is devalued, shock and outrage garner more attention than facts, and consequences are negotiable. Bluntly, it is transforming us into an increasingly stupid and cruel population. “
this author describes the left perfectly.
The person who wrote the article doesn’t have a clue about fomestic violence. Prolife has nothing to do with it. The woman is damned if she does, or damned if she does’nt.
Article designed to promote post-birth abortion to accommodate a \\violent man\\.
The doctor is a horrid person. She knows this woman is in an abusive relationship but refuses to offer her any practical help. Help such as what legal recourse the woman has. Help as in discussing long term or permanent birth control with her. Even directions to the nearest gun range. The doctor is in a position to explain to this woman how “no” really is an option. Instead she needs to feel superior to HER PATIENT and make sure her victim status remains intact in order to bolster her pro abortion beliefs. She truly needs to go find a job where such cruelty is appreciated like CCP prison guard.
There is one person in the story, if it is a true story, who deserves to be killed immediately. It is not the baby. It is not the mother.
Chloe Nazra Lee, MD, MPH, is a resident physician in the Department of Psychiatry at the University of Rochester Medical Center in New York. Her professional interests include women’s mental health, narrative medicine, and working with survivors of abuse. In her spare time, she writes about tensions in medical culture and medical misconduct.
She holds an MPH in Epidemiology from Columbia University. Dr. Lee has contributed to several publications including MedPage Today, Ms. Magazine, and Women’s Media Center.
“What if a woman with an abusive partner tries to obtain an elective abortion because she’s trying to escape her abuser? Would the abuser be justified in holding her against her will? Or even restraining or attacking her to “defend the life” of the fetus?”
Right there, what that doctor wrote, with all its blatant idiocy spelled out in the conclusion tells me she probably just missed being appointed a federal judge by Biden or Obama. Her name must have been on the short list.
Let’s prevent violence by killing children!
Is there something that the author is missing?
Her soul?
Is she really saying that it’s men’s fault that women have to get abortions? And that a solution to domestic abuse and violence against women is to sacrifice their babies? How can you even begin to reason with that mindset?
If you support the murder of human life, you’re not actually a medical doctor.
I believe there are some pro-lifers who can be quite cruel. Nobody is ‘good’ because they espouse one ideal.
I have a problem with those pro-lifers who insist that girls and women should bear the products of rape, and would force them to do if they could.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.