Posted on 02/25/2026 9:49:20 PM PST by Nextrush
With Bill and Hillary Clinton giving their depositions to the US House Government Oversight Committee over Clinton ties to Jeffrey Epstein a man known as a 'financier' I am certainly reminded of those "Clinton Years" of the 1990's.
Those years punctuated by financial questions about the Clinton's from the 'cattle futures' windfall for Hillary to the Whitewater project questions surrounding them and those infamous Rose Law Firm billing records.
But in the end it was all for nought as a probe of the Clinton's centered on financial wrongdoing descended into the pit of Bill Clinton's illicit sexual relationships and his deceptive spin culminating in the affair with Monica Lewinsky.
Probably my first question for the Clintons would concern the post-impeachment enrichment of Monica Lewinsky do they know how she got that rich was Jeffrey Epstein the 'financier' involved in enriching Lewinsky?
What about the impeachment and the report of the "Special Prosecutor-Special Counsel" Ken Starr that dovetailed with the impeachment.
In the end Mr. Starr would be friendly to Epstein just like the Clintons, very friendly to Jeffrey Epstein doing legal work for his sweetheart pedo plea deal but going further to say about Epstein:
"He's a prince"
And in a email to Epstein Starr went so far as to say...
one of the staunchest defenders of Bill Clinton in the 1990's arena in connection with the scandals and impeachment Jeffrey Epstein's pal, lawyer Alan Dershowitz...
"I just kept wondering how many people he'd killed" Clinton Political Guru James Carville On Epstein Friend Former Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak...
(Excerpt) Read more at nextrushfree.blogspot.com ...
|
Click here: to donate by Credit Card Or here: to donate by PayPal Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794 Thank you very much and God bless you. |
For AM Bump!
Hope you’re writing a book bump!
😊 😎
What I remember best about the impeachment trial in the senate was how only one senator went to look at the evidence........and the chief justice presiding over the trail did not enforce the silence rules against Pelosi (?), allowing her to talk thru the trial, and shout at other senators who voted wrong.
I wonder when or if the evidence against Clinton will ever be released? Remarcable that, as far as I know, there have been no leaks.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.