Savannah Guthrie's Mother Was Kidnapped Under The Watchful Eyes Of The American Stasi Ground Surveillance

This piece is premised on the book American Stasi, available free at AmericanStasi.com, and at all major booksellers. The book attempts to show that the nations of the West have all deployed East German Stasi-like ground surveillance in their communities, to monitor all the citizens, and make sure none can ever rise high enough in government to see the rampant fraud and abuse. The surveillance is most notable through its vehicular units, which follow established procedures, and which you can even see on Google Streetview, as they perform surveillance on the Google car as it moves through communities. Here we will show you the surveillance on the home of Savannah Guthrie's mom follows the same procedures as all of the other surveillance we show you in the book, most notably, showing up at intersections to call turns, as well as at targets of interest to document activity, but not on long stretches of road with no turnoffs.

I took a quick spin around the neighborhood, looking to see if there was a lot of vehicular traffic, however you will almost never see any other cars in the neighborhood, except when you are directly in front of Nancy Guthrie's house, or at intersections near it.

When directly in front of her house, if you look in one direction, to the north-east, you will see this vehicle has just rounded the corner as you pull in front of her driveway (click the pic for the link):

They will know this is the Google car, and it is not a threat, but they will still use the opportunity to practice their procedures and timing. I assume if you were a food delivery guy who entered this sector, with its VIP-Mom, they would make sure there was an additional roving unit moved to the location, which will happen to gain a sightline to you just as you arrive in front of the VIP-Mom's driveway.

They appear at exactly that moment to maximize their sight-time on you, so they can make sure you do not offload a passenger to assault the house, or drop a passive IR-triggered IED at the driveway entrance, drop a message, or do anything else of operational significance.

The timing of this roving unit's arrival could be arranged through aviation moved to the scene by central control, through remote surveillance cameras installed to monitor the house and road, (I would assume that neighborhood is swimming in covert pole-tech,) but in this case it was probably called by the posted unit parked in the opposite direction, covering the approach to her driveway from the other side:

Remember, surveillance procedure when conducting observation from a posted vehicle is to park with the back of the car pointing to the target, but off at a slight angle, as above, and to use the rearview mirrors for observation, to minimize the observer's exposure to the target.

You do not park head on to your target and look at them through your windshield as they look back at you. You park the way the car above parked, and you adjust your side mirror and your rearview mirrors to be able to clearly see the target, while all the target can see is the back of your car.

Looking there, you cannot even see if that car is occupied, which is how surveillance likes it.

Next intersection to the northeast can take you out of the neighborhood, or send you in deeper, and it is secured by both dog walkers on one side and an SUV leading you on the other:

The intersection immediately on the other side is ostensibly unmonitored, though it also has a telephone pole next to it which is the only one I see which features a large box transformer with multiple outputs, instead of a smaller residential tub transformer:

Here, a residential tub transformer casing encloses a camera on a pan/tilt gimbal:

Others will use pinhole cameras, and some even have actual transformers installed in them, making them functional as a transformer, to enhance their concealment, and dissuade any close-up investigation, due to the high-voltage.

The next intersection is most likely monitored by a hidden surveillance camera on the side of a surveillance vehicle left parked by the road:

You can see how it appears as if it was parked at the end of the driveway specifically to give it a sightline to that intersection:

Why they would not pull the car in the driveway, or even just further in the driveway, seems odd. People naturally prefer to secure their belongings close to them.

And of course when you enter her neighborhood from the sort-of main road, there just happen to be two cars exiting, one of which has the driver's side window open - a surveillance procedure which allows the occupant to also pick up on any auditory data in their environment which the surveillance command may be interested in:

And oddly enough they sit there a while, given you first see them sitting there from some distance off as you are approaching, and they just sit there as you come up on the intersection, and pull into the street:

We can go on, but you get the idea, intersections are watched, in between them is not, except for the one place where the mom of an NBC VIP lives, which is covered by not one, but two cars, the arrival of one of which is perfectly timed to your passing of the driveway.

So what happened? Well, either the snatch was premeditated or spur of the moment. If it was premeditated, then there is a decent chance they knew it was coming and were prepared ahead of time to document everything.

Everyone is watched, and your data is chipped up, organized with everyone elses, and presented to your sector file-archivist, who is responsible for actually knowing the 100-300 people in their sector.

Your sector's file archivist will get all the internet searches from everyone he is responsible for delivered to him or her each day, and skim through them. "Installing a GFCI outlet" is not paid much mind, especially if they registered you just bought a hot tub. "Sexy Midget Oil Wrestling" searched late at night might get a chuckle. "How to poison someone and not get caught" may, however, bring further scrutiny. Likewise, they see your purchases, and buying a ski-mask, rubber gloves, bleach, a large hunting knife, and a bonesaw off Ebay may also get you looked at closer until they have an idea of what you are up to.

If this was premeditated there are a myriad of such threads your neighborhood monitor is set up to easily pick up on. They have been doing this a long time now, and they learned where those threads lie, and they have seen where their blind spots were and covered them up over the past several decades.

Doing a murder and getting away with it without surveillance catching on to it is a lot more complicated than you would think. And again, that is how surveillance wants it, because it is how they catch you easily. You go around doing internet searches and buying supplies, never knowing how closely watched you are by an actual person whose job it is to be all in your business.

So if this was a premeditated crime, IMO, surveillance likely knew it was coming. Knowing surveillance, I would not even be surprised the intelligence operation it serves could have been responsible for this. Guthrie is pretty important and thus high ranking in the conspiracy which has taken over our Constitutional Republic and replaced it with this shadow dictatorship. As part of that, she knows about a lot of crimes, and the surveillance, and probably more. I have no idea if she could make some mistake, or harm the conspiracy, and if its response might be to harm a family member as some form of discipline.

I find it hard to believe surveillance would see this go down, and not intervene, unless the mother was killed outright in the house, and was entirely unsavable, leaving no advantage to intervening vs letting the Police come in and solve the crime afterward.

Although I have no doubt a massive number of the children of mere plebes have been grabbed, savagely harmed, and murdered, all while surveillance dutifully documented what happened, step by step, for their records, and never intervened, I think given Savannah Guthrie's position, they would have intervened here, unless it was their op.

All they would have had to do is call in a tip to the Police, with a vehicle description and a claim the driver appeared drunk, or an anonymous noise complaint at the house. But they apparently did nothing.

If it was not premeditated, and was spur of the moment, the ears in Nancy Guthrie's house (through backdoored mics in smart TV remotes, Alexas, Ring Cameras, cell phones, house phones, intercoms, computer webcam mics, and so on, all of which her neighborhood monitor has backdoor access to), would certainly have picked up on it quickly given she probably had round-the-clock monitoring. That would have generated a surge of surveillance resources which would have documented everything afterward, as you saw in the case of the Torso Drop caught on surveillance camera and covered at the end of Chapter Nineteen of the book here.

Regardless, I guarantee you, surveillance was watching when whatever went down happened, and right now, surveillance knows exactly what has happened to Savannah Guthrie's mom - and they are not about to help Law Enforcement, whether they did it themselves, or not.

Message from Jim Robinson:

Dear FRiends,

We need your continuing support to keep FR funded. Your donations are our sole source of funding. No sugar daddies, no advertisers, no paid memberships, no commercial sales, no gimmicks, no tax subsidies. No spam, no pop-ups, no ad trackers.

If you enjoy using FR and agree it's a worthwhile endeavor, please consider making a contribution today:

Click here: to donate by Credit Card

Or here: to donate by PayPal

Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794

Thank you very much and God bless you,

Jim

New piece showing domestic surveillance vehicles staked out on Samantha Guthrie's mom's house, as all VIP and family in the US have to forestall any revolutionary activities before they can begin. However in cases of petty crimes, even murders or kidnappings, or anything which does not threaten the control of the Oligarchs, they will remain in the shadows, and not get involved.

This thing will have someone in your neighborhood who is assigned to know you and a couple hundred other residents around you. And if your child show potential in school by scoring too high on standardized tests, they will get the full surveillance package to see if they should be brought into the club, or if they will be a threat. That can be very bad for them, if you have raised them to be highly moral.

Sounds like nothing more than people desiring to protect themselves. The problem is, that what she chose to protect herself in a more rural setting is not really that helpful at all.

All of the cameras now present are the result of rising criminal actuivity, and the desire to combat that requires tools to capture the criminals to put them away. But then they started electing prosucutors & DAs who would subvert alw wnforcement that kept the criminals out on the streets as let another force to detroy this natioon that was built on law & order.

It's not the government keeping a watchful eye to control the population as this stupid article is incorrectly suggesting. It's yet another attempt to sow division and provide cover for the criminals that are now runnoing this nation, because quite frankly it is likely to catch them with these devices around.

Cell phones, that most people have, are devices that can place you in areas that will dspute you if you were in those areas. But the government doesn't supply you with those items.

If you are paranoid, then rid yourself of these innovations that track your movements.

The Reddit Gangstalking forum, which unbeknown to most of the people there when they showed up, perfectly described the East German Stasi technique the agency called Zersetzung - using civilian assets in a target’s community to harass them to break them down - that forum has 40,000 people on it describing the surveillance you see at American Stasi.

After I wrote the book The Evolutionary Psychology Behind Politics this agency showed up in my life. I have seen it first hand, and you can call be crazy, call me delusional, the book speaks for itself, and the site American Stasi shows exactly what is out there. There are others on this site which have seen it, I am not alone, even here.

I too, could not believe there would be this many traitors in our nation who would join something like the Stasi against fellow Americans and the Constitution, but humans are humans, and just like the East Germans produced it, so has the US intelligence community.

The truth is, they already created it publicly with Operation TIPS, which had more such civilian informants than the Stasi.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_TIPS

It was supposed to be shut down, but the IC did not want to surrender the power, so it took it underground. The harassment from this civilian network actually left the reporter who broke the Operation TIPS story, Kip Goldstein, as the only American living presently in Europe under political asylum, a status he had to acquire with proof.

And I should add, the first page at AmericanStasi.com shows video of surveillance people unmistakably doing gangstalking/harassment surveillance, including children discussing taking part in surveillance on Americans, so this thing has its own Hitler Youth, with parents raising their kids to be profoundly unamerican, in ways it is not clear they will ever share a culture with the rest of the nation.

If you want to lecture me on how our intelligence community is so moral, or the US government is not at all abusive or criminal, given it looks like the people in it are stealing 2/3 of the tax money, or that in a criminal empire like that, the people in power will let anyone rise and bee as successful as they want (and maybe run for President and expose what is happening) or the tech is not here to recreate the Stasi-times-ten, go ahead.

But this country has big problems, and pretending there is no Stasi formed in it, when there appears to be according to video evidence on the front page of that site and 40,000 redditors (and 10,000 people documented by the New York Times), is not conducive to reestablishing a lawful, Constitutional government.

The surveillance will have to be dealt with first.

It's not the government keeping a watchful eye to control the population as this stupid article is incorrectly suggesting.

I cannot speak for cars in the neighborhood, but "Echelon" and the successor to "Carnivore" have been a thing for decades, monitoring all IP traffic.

I knew someone who worked on a government data storage facility in Utah. Filled with tapes. The problem is the data comes in like a fire hose, and ten years ago they were five years behind in analyzing the data. AI would be useful in trying to get caught up, and I certainly do not know where things stand now, but there assuredly is a ubiquitous data scanning.

“ East German Stasi technique the agency called Zersetzung - using civilian assets in a target’s community to harass them to break them down ”

This is used against corporate and government whistleblowers all the time.

Had an acquaintance who was a whistleblower and I got surveiled very openly and hostile because I continued to be his friend.

It rolled off my back due to owning my own company and having clients who didn’t care. Plus being very close (as in inlaws) with local jurisdiction police. They chased them off.

We started following the investigators.

Thank you for the account.

I do not do this for me at this point. What has come to my attention is the children of the surveillance people are being run in the schools, and used to try and derail kids who score too high on standardized tests, which as I understand it today are a trick to get the high performers to reveal themselves. If your child gets straight hundreds, we think, “God bless them, they should do great things.”

The problem is everybody in government has NGOs, or think tanks, or some charity a family member runs, and they are all ripping off the treasury. As I recall, Lindsey Graham got all huffy about cutting USAID, saying how necessary it was, until somebody pointed out a think tank he chaired got something like $120 million grant from it each year.

The people up there look at that kid who is a genius, and they just see threat, especially if they are moral, and they have now corrupted this machine to deal with that threat.

From the “Porn Fairy” leaving porn where your kid plays, to exposing them to alcohol or drugs, or entrapping them in crime, to surrounding them with “friends” who are bad influences, to even molestations and honeypots, they will derail the high flyers who are found by the surveillance kids around them to be moral.

You do not want our scumbag intelligence community running children assets in our schools, to control who rises and falls, when the entire US government is a massive criminal enterprise manned entirely by scumbags and traitors. I cannot put it any clearer. This is the hill to die on, even if weaker minds either refuse to see it or do not care.

As I said, thank you for telling the honest observers here you have seen this thing too.

The contrail stuff is most likely a holdover from the 80’s, as I understand it, when the Soviets were trying to keep up on satellite resolution, but had limited resources.

Dump enough particulate-generator in the jet fuel, all across the nation, when nobody is looking, and make the sky hazy, and suddenly there is no incentive for Ivan to upgrade his satellites to the next generation of resolution, as the imagery of our facilities will be no different, whether his resolution is eight inches or two inches. The hope was, do it long enough and suddenly it is 1990 and Ivan has decided his money was better spent elsewhere, and his satellites are still 1960’s era, when we meet in Europe. I assume they still do it just out of inertia.

No, the key is, do you not see cars, because there is no traffic in an area, until you come to operationally significant spots, or make a decision on direction of travel, like at an intersection.

In American Stasi, it shows long stretches out West, where the Google car sees nobody, but every intersection it comes to, up pulls a car. And if you jump around each intersection, you will see there were no cars out there, but whether the Google car hit the intersection from the north, south, east, or west, there was a single car which just happened to be pulling up. Then you pull away from the intersection, go four miles, and there is no traffic coming the other way, no cars behind you, none out to the horizon in front, until you get to that next intersection.

It takes the premise of the surveillance detection route in surveillance operations, where you go somewhere there should be no followers, and then see if you still have a follower, and it melds it with Google Streetview, to show there is a massive surveillance operation, as bad as the Stasi was, in America today.

Why? Could it be that you are unaware of how many crimes are solved with all of these cameras?

They scare criminals too, for that very reason.

Of course, criminals in high positions, can use them for subversive purposes, but that is why we must be mindful of whom we allow to make decisions on things that are double-edged swords. Life is full of dangers, and more often than we care to admit, we invite that danger into our lives.

Technology is a double-edged sword that cuts both ways. Once it becomes available, there is no putting it back, or taking it away.

So, are perceptions. What we see happening with ICE is a clear example of what perceptions bring to the table. These idiots fighting ICE see ICE & Trump as being evil, and they are reacting to their perception.

My perception is just the opposite on ICE, and perhaps your perception mirrors my perception.

Innovations can be used for good, or they can be used as a weapon.

Government can be used for good, or it can be weaponized. But this is nothing new, we have to be aware of the pitfuls, and guard against them. So, far we have done a pretty poor job of doing that. We must also be mindful of the actions that are not what this nation is about, and who are pushing for those objhectives because that is who will make this a better nation, or will destroy this nation.

As I see this article, it is pushing a narrative that is instilling fear rather than providing a clear expose of what are the positives & the negatives when it comes to innovations. This article just [oints to the negatives, and igores the positives, even though both exist, not just one or the other.

Yeah, in the wrong hands, surveillance is a threat. In the right hands, it combats threats. It's not the object, it's who controls the end results.

Right now it is Democrats for sure who are the threat, but it also inclues Republicans who are really with the Democrat goal of obtaining absolute power, and they are nothing but a criminal organization based squarely within evil's deesires.

So again, it's not the gun that is the problem, it is who is in control of the gun, for that is who we need to be aware of. The problem comes from correctly or incorrectly identifying the who, not the inanimate object, which in this instance is surveillance information. For it is the who deciding how to use or misuse that information, not the surveillance information itself.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.