Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

When Justice Jackson Dug Up Racist Laws to Justify Restricting Rights
Flopping Aces ^ | 01-20-26 | Curt

Posted on 01/20/2026 9:29:14 AM PST by Starman417

Carrie Severino nailed it with one line:

Because apparently, in 2026, we’re now shopping for constitutional guidance in the same aisle as Jim Crow.

During Supreme Court arguments on gun laws, Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson suggested that the Black Codes should count as part of constitutional history. You know, those charming post Civil War laws written specifically to make sure freed slaves stayed powerless, disarmed, and miserable.

But don’t worry. According to this logic, since they existed “back then,” they deserve a seat at the grown ups’ table. Never mind that their entire purpose was to crush civil rights. History is history, right?

That is not legal reasoning. That is moral amnesia.

The lawyer at least tried to inject sanity. He pointed out that those laws were unconstitutional from birth. They were not safety measures. They were leash laws. And if Bruen is supposed to identify real traditions, then maybe we should not treat racist power grabs as timeless constitutional wisdom.

Crazy idea, I know.

Here is the deeper problem. Progressives usually tell us the Constitution must “evolve” and not be chained to outdated thinking. But suddenly, when it helps restrict rights, even the ugliest laws in American history become “important context.”

Funny how that works.

(Excerpt) Read more at floppingaces.net...


TOPICS: Government; Politics
KEYWORDS: blackcodes; crow; jackson; liberaltruth; scotus; slavery

1 posted on 01/20/2026 9:29:14 AM PST by Starman417
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Starman417

Will we also bring back Jim Crow?


2 posted on 01/20/2026 9:34:25 AM PST by ClearCase_guy (Democrats seek power through cheating and assassination. They are sociopaths. They just want power.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Starman417

but she can’t read so dug who it up for her


3 posted on 01/20/2026 9:45:37 AM PST by butlerweave (Fateh)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Starman417

Well those Jim Crow laws were fruits of the Democrat Party rebirth.

Wilmington.


4 posted on 01/20/2026 10:15:37 AM PST by KC Burke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Starman417

Black Codes (United States)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_Codes_(United_States)


5 posted on 01/20/2026 10:20:41 AM PST by Libloather (Why do climate change hoax deniers live in mansions on the beach?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

“Will we also bring back Jim Crow?”

There were a lot less drive-bys back then.


6 posted on 01/20/2026 10:24:58 AM PST by dljordan (Yeah, I'm a Boomer and it's all my fault you whiny little bitch.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Starman417

She is too stupid to dig anything out of history or law books. EVERYTHING she writes has been written by her handlers.


7 posted on 01/20/2026 11:27:37 AM PST by Organic Panic ('Was I molested. I think so' - Ashley Biden in response to her father joining her in the shower)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Starman417
It's just a narcissist validating anything they want to validate, using no logic but expecting their assertion and “credibility” will hold the illogic through the occasion, because, well, everyone she is against is stupid and must be put down.
8 posted on 01/20/2026 12:22:06 PM PST by ConservativeMind (Trump: Befuddling Democrats, Republicans, and the Media for the benefit of the US and all mankind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Starman417

Just proves her subordinates have an IQ lower than her 48. She is using the political rule that one must higher subordinates dumber than the boss so the boss seems to shine.


9 posted on 01/20/2026 2:51:19 PM PST by RetiredTexasVet (Trump has arrived and it is awesome to have a real President.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Starman417

She’s only 55 years old. She’ll be on the court for another 30-40 years.


10 posted on 01/20/2026 6:37:48 PM PST by Mr. N. Wolfe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Arthur Wildfire! March; Berosus; Bockscar; BraveMan; cardinal4; ...

11 posted on 01/20/2026 8:54:17 PM PST by SunkenCiv (NeverTrumpin' -- it's not just for DNC shills anymore -- oh, wait, yeah it is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson