Norman Podhoretz’s intellectual journey and the fate of American Jewry

The “Commentary” editor’s career epitomized both the success of 20th-century Jews and an awakening to the peril posed by the moral collapse of political liberalism.

There are those who insist that no one person, let alone a journal of opinion, can be said to have changed the world. Yet this was true of Norman Podhoretz and Commentary magazine. The man and his magazine helped win the Cold War, while awakening Americans to the moral bankruptcy of modern political liberalism and the threat it posed to the two countries that he loved: America and Israel.

The longtime editor of Commentary, who died on Dec. 15 at the age of 95, was more than a seminal figure among Jewish intellectuals of his era. He was that rare man of letters whose work transcended the worlds of literature, Jewish life and journalism in which he labored for many decades. To take a deep dive into his many essays, the 12 books he authored—not to mention the volumes of issues of the monthly magazine he edited from 1960 to 1995—is to take a journey through the history of the last century.

The remarkable thing about so much of Norman Podhoretz’s writing is how relevant it is to contemporary political battles. That’s especially true for this work concerning the defense of America and the Jewish people, causes to which he remained devoted throughout his life. In this way, even though the volume of his writing diminished in the last decade and a half of his life, the body of work he created remains fresh and vital to the struggles he engaged in so ardently.

Message from Jim Robinson:

Dear FRiends,

We need your continuing support to keep FR funded. Your donations are our sole source of funding. No sugar daddies, no advertisers, no paid memberships, no commercial sales, no gimmicks, no tax subsidies. No spam, no pop-ups, no ad trackers.

If you enjoy using FR and agree it's a worthwhile endeavor, please consider making a contribution today:

Click here: to donate by Credit Card

Or here: to donate by PayPal

Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794

Thank you very much and God bless you,

Jim

Take, for example, one piece he wrote for the New York Post in May 1986 (prior to that newspaper’s archive being digitized), a clipping of which fell out of one of his books in my personal library when I opened it while preparing to write about him. Titled “Anti-Semitism in the ‘Nation,’” it discussed that left-wing magazine’s decision to publish an openly antisemitic essay by author Gore Vidal in which he referred to Jews as “Israeli fifth columnists,” nothing more than guests in the United States who should shut up about “the politics of the host country.”

FROM THE ARTICLE:
“But as he later wrote, it was during his two years of Army service, in which he encountered the people and the culture outside of New York, that he began to understand the greatness of America and its people. And it was that love for his country that animated his refusal to go along with cultural trends that denigrated it.”

Podhoretz was called many things, some fair and some less so. One thing he could never be called was anti-American. Quite to the contrary, he was always pro-American. That didn’t really learn all of what that meant until he met people from outside NY.... is quite understandable to me. I have had the privilege of knowning a number of NYCers. Several of them were “doctrinaire, hard-core, committed communistas” (my phrase, obviously). They DID NOT REALIZE just how “brainwashed” (my phrase, again) they were... even while reflexively or slavishly repeating hard-core-leftist propaganda phrases in their (pathetic, really, albeit in good faith) efforts to explain (more or less justify) their committments to “progressive” (if there ever was an oxymoronic term in our public political discourse, that’s it!) “causes.”

They were just like little leftist robots, without even the ability to deal rationally with “inconvenient” factual information.

What I really admired about Podhoretz was how he was able to do just that, deal rationally with factual information that contradicted his original political or sociological learning, leanings.

Given the general failures of most communistic policies and programs, we would have a much, much improved country of more people could do as Podhortez did and simply put their “progressive” politics in suspense for even ten minutes...and -— all ideologies aside, just look at how so many of the communist/leftwing policies actually have worked (failed) in the real world.

In the course of human affairs, the pendulum ever swings but almost always overcorrects. Podhoretz was an intellectual who should be credited with resetting the pendulum on a proper course that redefined American foreign policy priorities to include moral clarity and robust, even muscular, action in furtherance of American interests.

These neocons arrested the leftward course of the pendulum and redirected it in the right direction until that correction must in turn be corrected and aligned with a realistic understanding of the limitations of American power to advance American interests with the force of arms, such as became apparent in Vietnam, Iraq and Afghanistan.

Today the battle rages to set this pendulum on its proper course, that is, to define in particularity when and where American interests require martial intervention in places like Ukraine, Iran, Venezuela and Taiwan.

That analysis must turn in each case on the peculiar facts of that case, analyzed with the kind of intellectual rigor that Podhoretz summoned, rather than resorting to mindlessly reciting shibboleth.

understood.
one thing (not the only thing, but one thing) is .. imho.. IF we commit troops anywhere, we need to have a pretty clear idea of what “victory” will constitute, look like.
AND we need to let the military win that victory. No military force, regardless of how well provisioned, trained, and willing... can win any real fighting with a political rein (noose) around its neck.

The second thing we need to learn is not to give away victories (arguably even the half-victories we had in hand in Afghanistan and Iraq and Vietnam). We can draw a lesson from Israel. Israel keeps getting attacked because its politicians almost always give away the IDF’s (often miraculous, in my humble opinion) victories. The greatest enemy there is not the bloodthirsty Islamicists. The greatest enemy there is the Israeli government in Jerusalem (politicians) that give away the IDF’s victories (and even enable the enemies).

In retrospect, I can see the arguments that we should not have committed to Afghanistan or Vietnam. But having done so, we needed to let the military fight to win. Both withdrawls were absolute disasters. A couple of the worst outcomes of conflict in history, imho. Not the military’s fault, either. Even if we all had decided to end Afghanistan and Vietnam short of Victories.....neither ending had to be so utterly embarrassing and disasterous.
Again, blame our political elite not the military. It makes USA look completely unreliable in the world stage, like, frankly, a giant buffoon.

PS: one more thought, we really need to cut back on the bullshit artistry of “special negotiators” or whatever...trying to set up “peace conferences” and “reconstruction programs” and all the rest. My Lord, these are often such utterly unrealistic ideas (and often undesirable ones, too)! It makes USA look like a cash cow begging anyone in sight to milk her dry. (Comment: of course, we’ve seen how a major portion of these funds are then stolen or syphoned off by corrupt USA administrations or contractors or both. This, too, is noted on the world stage. It does not make USA look any better (to put it mildly).

Just random generalities. Your thoughts are noted, thanks. I personally have some concerns with a few of the things we hear from WashDC even today with the PDJT administration. Hopefully, he will clean it all up. Certainly there’s a chance because (on good days, anyway) he does articulate awareness of these matters. But then again, his income tax cuts were 98 percent campaign promises and became only 2 percent actual implemented policy. Maybe he gets some awful advice, maybe the da**ed Congress with its RINO-DNC Uniparty gets in the way (it surely does, not just maybe). Or? We like PDJT and he’s promised or stated some positive directions but ..... we are hoping for more genuine, substantive results.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.