Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Jack Smith says he could prove Trump engaged in 'criminal scheme' to overturn 2020 election
YouTube.com ^ | December 18, 2025 | NBC News✓

Posted on 12/18/2025 12:46:24 PM PST by E. Pluribus Unum

During testimony behind closed doors, former special counsel Jack Smith told lawmakers he believed he could prove President Donald Trump engaged in a "criminal scheme" in order to overturn the 2020 election. NBC News' Ryan Reilly reports on Smith's investigation and what members of Congress had to say.

Summary

Former special counsel Jack Smith testified in a closed-door House Judiciary Committee hearing on December 17, 2025, after being subpoenaed by Republicans. He defended his investigation into President Trump's efforts to overturn the 2020 election, stating that his team found proof beyond a reasonable doubt of Trump's involvement in a criminal scheme. Smith emphasized that he believed the case was strong and could have resulted in a conviction had it proceeded to trial, but it was dismissed due to Justice Department policy against prosecuting a sitting president, not due to lack of merit.

The hearing was held privately despite Smith's request for a public session, which Republicans denied. Democratic Rep. Jamie Raskin commented afterward that Chairman Jim Jordan made a wise decision in keeping it closed, as a public testimony would have been devastating to Trump and those involved in January 6 activities, citing Smith's report and indictments.

Reporter Ryan Reilly (likely intended as Ryan J. Reilly) noted that Smith maintained the investigation was conducted properly. No significant leaks from Republicans emerged immediately, and limited public reaction from Republicans or the Trump administration was reported at the time. Smith anticipated potential selective leaks but appeared to handle the session effectively on the public relations front.

(Excerpt) Read more at youtube.com ...


TOPICS: Humor; Weird Stuff
KEYWORDS: arrestjacksmith; arrestjamieraskin; arrestryanreilly; closeddoorhearing; concerntroll; concerntrolling; coupaccomplice; dangoldman; enemyjournalist; fakenews; j6coupaccomplice; jacksmith; jacksmithmusthang; jamieraskin; lannybreuer; nbc; nbchearsay; nbcsedition; noneedforpics; pramilajayapal; quotingjamieraskin; quotingsmithslawyer; ryanreilly; spammingfr; spammingnewsforum; spamtrollwhiner; tds; toldyouitwasntnews
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last
Never give up the con.
1 posted on 12/18/2025 12:46:24 PM PST by E. Pluribus Unum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
The 2020 election was the criminal scheme.
2 posted on 12/18/2025 12:47:55 PM PST by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is opinion or satire. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Yes. The psychopath lies freely and often.


3 posted on 12/18/2025 12:49:00 PM PST by hinckley buzzard ( Resist the narrative. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

“We have put together the most extensive and inclusive voter fraud organization in the history of American politics”—Joe Biden, October 2020


4 posted on 12/18/2025 12:50:50 PM PST by RightWingNutJob69
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

It was the other way around. The leftists did overturn the 2020 election.


5 posted on 12/18/2025 12:51:15 PM PST by MtnClimber (For photos of scenery, wildlife and climbing, click on my screen name for my FR home page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

It’s not illegal to try and overturn an election. The Congress and Courts have mechanisms for doing just that, and Trump attempted to use them to the fullest.


6 posted on 12/18/2025 12:52:30 PM PST by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Trying to expose vote fraud is not a ‘criminal scheme’


7 posted on 12/18/2025 12:55:17 PM PST by Mr. K (no i think 10%consequence of repealing obamacare is worse than obamacare itself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

If he really had something, he would have hand delivered it to the nearest media buddies. Don’t believe a word Smith says. Remember, he resigned to save face because President Trump publicly stated he’s gonna fire the Smith when he took office.


8 posted on 12/18/2025 12:55:33 PM PST by gildafarrell ("To Strive, To Seek, To Find and Not To Yield!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

I hope he does some jail time.


9 posted on 12/18/2025 12:55:39 PM PST by silent majority rising ( United Israel - Judea, Samaria, and Gaza - US get out of the UN-we are not United with them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Is anyone else reminded of Rasputin when they see a photo of Jack Smith? Evil just rolls off of their being. Gives me the creeps.


10 posted on 12/18/2025 12:56:52 PM PST by ryderann
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

He’s delusional.


11 posted on 12/18/2025 12:57:07 PM PST by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

I suspect that Jack is lying to us.


12 posted on 12/18/2025 12:57:41 PM PST by 55Ford (https://external-content.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=https%3A%2F%2Ftse1.mm.bing.net%2Fth%2Fid%2FOIP.Xy4oYwb)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Smith is lying like his life depends on it.


13 posted on 12/18/2025 12:58:06 PM PST by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
Justice Department policy against prosecuting a sitting president

How much money did they spend on an investigation into something which they (apparently) had no intention of pursuing?

14 posted on 12/18/2025 12:59:01 PM PST by ClearCase_guy (Democrats seek power through cheating and assassination. They are sociopaths. They just want power.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Yes, in Smith’s twisted, globalist marxist mind, he can “prove it” under any absurd stretching of any number of laws - just like impeachment #1.

Show me the man, and I’ll show you the crime.


15 posted on 12/18/2025 12:59:05 PM PST by PGR88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Scumbag says what?!?!

See the problem for Scum is that he doesn’t cite a statute or specific law that he thinks Trump violated that actually APPLIES to the alleged offense. He just picks and chooses and figures a friendly DC Court will play along. Like Scum did to the VA Governor and his wife, he cobbles together a little of this and a little of that to create an offense.

It amounts to no more than creating an offense out of being the opposition to Scum’s preferred political party.

Last time he did this, the Supreme Court overturned his work 9-0 and that Court included Ruth Bader Ginsburg.


16 posted on 12/18/2025 1:00:04 PM PST by FlipWilson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: silent majority rising

“I hope he does some jail time.”

I hope I win the powerball, (and I don’t buy tickets).

Both things have the same chance of happening.


17 posted on 12/18/2025 1:00:32 PM PST by brownsfan (We are already on the slippery slope.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

[url=https://postimg.cc/RWddB6mY][img]https://i.postimg.cc/RWddB6mY/images-(7).jpg[/img][/url]


18 posted on 12/18/2025 1:02:40 PM PST by V_TWIN (America........so great even the people that hate it won't leave)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

The Dan Rather lead filled life vest.


19 posted on 12/18/2025 1:03:34 PM PST by blackdog (The philosophy of the schoolroom in one generation will be the philosophy of government in the next.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Jack who?


20 posted on 12/18/2025 1:03:45 PM PST by lastchance (Cognovit Dominus qui sunt eius.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson